Tio Pepe Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I'm hearing Neil Warnock has been in Glasgow over the weekend and is being touted as the next The Rangers manager. He was working for BT on the PT v DU game. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taxi for Ben Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Chuckles Green interview on SSN shortly, according to Luke Shanley on Twitter That should be worth watching for a chuckle. Any specific time given? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Chuckles on Sky Sports News now. "Craig Whyte bought Rangers for a pound, the Blue Knights should have gave David Murray two pound then." Also says he won't take Jim Mccoll seriously unless he wires 14million to one his bank accounts. Talking about Sally after the break but I'm going out. God I've missed him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuyahoga Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Jim McColl has issued a statement to Press Association. Details very soon hopefully. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain kirk Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Jim McColl has issued a statement to Press Association. Details very soon hopefully. "Im pure Rangurs so am ur ..oor enumies n that..punished enough..stabulity n that..geese yer money"? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain kirk Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Has sally inserted his tongue up jim McColls arse yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozam76 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Stands by what he says about Rangers needing to win a cup alongside the league. Says that Rangers should be on a plane today, alongside Celtic, to play in Europe - and that that will NEVER happen under guys like Paul Murray. Never mind the wee matter of a European ban though, eh? Serious question - are there any Rangers supporters actually buying his schtick? If you are buying it, for god sake why? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 (edited) Much confusion and disagreement over on berrzmeeja. Site also running s_l_o_w, maybe a meltdown coming. Edited August 6, 2013 by cyderspaceman 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killingfloorman Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Are we Dead Yet? yep, again 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taxi for Ben Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Chuckles on Sky Sports News now. "Craig Whyte bought Rangers for a pound, the Blue Knights should have gave David Murray two pound then." Also says he won't take Jim Mccoll seriously unless he wires 14million to one his bank accounts. Talking about Sally after the break but I'm going out. God I've missed him. Green shall not be moved. "Im pure Rangurs so am ur ..oor enumies n that..punished enough..stabulity n that..geese yer money"? Only Charles Green the founder of RIFC has the ability to stabilise RIFC. The followers of his club are mostly former fans of RFC and it is not an easy job that he has taken on. There is no greater supporter of RIFC than Green. For that reason alone he should have the full backing of all of the fans of his club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy85 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Statement in response to comments from Rangers FC Tuesday, 06 August 2013 Scottish FA spokesperson: In response to the recent public comments from Rangers FC, and in particular Craig Mather and Ally McCoist, the Scottish FA offers the clarification requested with regard to Insolvency Rules under the Judicial Panel Protocol. As yet the Scottish FA has not received a formal, written request for clarification by Rangers. Notwithstanding the fact that a full note of reasons was published by the Judicial Panel Chair, Gary Allan QC, at the time of the determination - disseminated to the club directly, and to the public via the media we are happy to reiterate the salient points in the interests of clarity and transparency: The Disciplinary Rules of the Judicial Panel Protocol provide a sliding scale of sanctions, with a suggested tariff of low-end, mid-range, top-end and maximum. This reflects the potential variations in seriousness of any breaches and any aggravating or mitigating factors. Rangers were fined £50,000 for a breach of Rule 14(g) based on the panels view that the evidence presented on both sides merited a sanction at the maximum end of the tariff. This was evidenced in the Note of Reasons: Page 30 At the time of the first withheld payment in September 2011 Rangers FCs financial situation was such that it could have made the payment due to HMRC. Page 33 The non-payment was a deliberate act in furtherance of a decision of the Chairman and director of Rangers FC not to make payment as a negotiating tactic in the resolution of the Big Tax Case. Page 56 In the case of the non-payment of tax (which was possibly by the smallest margin the most serious breach) the massive extent of the failure and the intentional and calculated manner in which it was carried out aggravated the breach even further. Rangers were placed into administration following the deliberate non-payment of social taxes, despite in the evidence provided - having the money to do so when the decision was first taken to withhold the money. This was not a feature in the Heart of Midlothian or Dunfermline Athletic cases. Contrary to Mr Mathers statement, Rangers registration embargo was applied in a separate rule breach, Rule 66 Bringing the Game into Disrepute. The administrators in the two other cases (Heart of Midlothian and Dunfermline Athletic) submitted that fines would be inappropriate as the clubs effectively had no money and any fine could jeopardise attempts to save the club. They made submissions on their clubs' financial position to reinforce their view. Rangers' lawyer, in contrast, specifically asked for the club to be fined in respect of Charge 3, or Rule 14(g). He did not lead evidence of Rangers' financial position or ability to pay any fine. Rangers did not appeal the fine. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Well done SFA for bringing some facts to the stirring tittle tattle from McCoist & Mather. http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish_fa_news.cfm?page=1961&newsCategoryID=3&newsID=12282 Tail between legs guys, look guilty and think before you open yer gobs. (Nae chance. ) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy85 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 My favourite part was this bit. "Rangers' lawyer, in contrast, specifically asked for the club to be fined in respect of Charge 3, or Rule 14(g). He did not lead evidence of Rangers' financial position or ability to pay any fine." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 STV Sport @STVSport 24m Ally McCoist's position 'is still secure' says Rangers board member http://bit.ly/11JWRGl View summary Reply Retweet Favourite :thumsup2 :thumsup2 :thumsup2 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish_fa_news.cfm?page=1961&newsCategoryID=3&newsID=12282 The webpage cannot be found HTTP 404 Most likely causes: •There might be a typing error in the address. •If you clicked on a link, it may be out of date. What you can try: Retype the address. Go back to the previous page. Go to and look for the information you want 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taxi for Ben Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Douglas Fraser @BBCDouglasF Jim McColl statement on #Rangers: I'm not wanting to join board or increase 'small' stake. Duty bound to other businesses to focus on them So does this mean big Jim has walked away??? It is much most likely that he has been scared away by the former fans of RFC who are following this new club that I fully support. It is more than worth supporting for its comedy value alone. Some people pay a lot more to attend various comedy events around the world than it costs me for my season ticket for RIFC. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 f**k you Sally and Mather you rabble rousing p***ks! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Nice timing from the SFA, nice timing indeed to sneak that in. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 What did Chuckles say that was so wrong? Walter has a history of being used and backing the wrong horse. Correct. None of these guys did anything when the old club went bust. Correct. The teams performance in relation to its budget had been terrible. Correct. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killingfloorman Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 f**k you Sally and Mather you rabble rousing p***ks! I'm sure they will come out with a ful apology. Aye right 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.