No8. Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 (edited) According to UEFA there is an interuption to that history. Unblock my signature and you'll see. As if i know how to unblock a signature. You are (un)Lucky i can switch the thing on. Edited August 4, 2014 by No8. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 Touched a raw nerve ... we don't have to pretend. It might well be a raw nerve. ICT never have been and never will be Caley. Caley were far more than that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bing (2) Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 My team are playing tomorrow at their stadium. 142 years of unbroken history...Just ask the ASA "Their" stadium.......? Lol. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 "Their" stadium.......? Lol. You still here Wunf. You're having a good wee run. Wee AWRA never lasts more than half a dozen posts. You should give him a few tips 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 I think the Vanguard Bears may be about to cut their club's throat. I was having a wee nosey and spotted this http://www.vanguardbears.co.uk/sfa-agenda-exposed-soon.html. For those that can't be bothered clicking, it says that the VBs have soon-to-be-released evidence highlighting the SFA's lack of integrity in their handling of "Ranger's 'punishment' upon entering administration'. Assuming this means that the VBs think the SFA imposed unlawful 'punishments', I think this may sting the authorities into action. They can either say that they punished Rangers using measures that were previously deemed to be outwith their armoury (confirming the VBs' case) OR... they admit that Rangers were a new team looking for entry into the professional leagues under exceptional circumstances and therefore could have any pre-conditions applied. Could get interesting. If anyone rises to the bait. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 I think the Vanguard Bears may be about to cut their club's throat. I was having a wee nosey and spotted this http://www.vanguardbears.co.uk/sfa-agenda-exposed-soon.html. For those that can't be bothered clicking, it says that the VBs have soon-to-be-released evidence highlighting the SFA's lack of integrity in their handling of "Ranger's 'punishment' upon entering administration'. Assuming this means that the VBs think the SFA imposed unlawful 'punishments', I think this may sting the authorities into action. They can either say that they punished Rangers using measures that were previously deemed to be outwith their armoury (confirming the VBs' case) OR... they admit that Rangers were a new team looking for entry into the professional leagues under exceptional circumstances and therefore could have any pre-conditions applied. Could get interesting. If anyone rises to the bait. Going back 2ish years ago but I seem to recall that the punishment was deemed illegal in the Court of Session. I also seem to recall the response was something like, "Accept it or we will do worse". Isn't this auld news? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 (edited) Going back 2ish years ago but I seem to recall that the punishment was deemed illegal in the Court of Session. I also seem to recall the response was something like, "Accept it or we will do worse". Isn't this auld news? Was it not the transfer embargo which was deemed illegal to be enforced on an existing club? Because Sevco Scotland were a new club they agreed to accept a transfer embargo as part of an agreement for them recieving a membership of the SFA.Edit- the original transfer ban was a part of the punishment for bringing the game into disrepute. The transfer embargo which was served upon Sevco was a condition of Sevco being granted a membership to the SFA and agreed to by Charles Green. Edited August 4, 2014 by stonedsailor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 Was it not the transfer embargo which was deemed illegal to be enforced on an existing club? Because Sevco Scotland were a new club they agreed to accept a transfer embargo as part of an agreement for them recieving a membership of the SFA. Exactly. Unless Rangers are seen as 'new entrants', the SFA could be in trouble. This should really bury the 'relegated versus admitted' argument. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 Was it not the transfer embargo which was deemed illegal to be enforced on an existing club? Because Sevco Scotland were a new club they agreed to accept a transfer embargo as part of an agreement for them recieving a membership of the SFA. Rangers never had a transfer embargo..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 I think the Vanguard Bears may be about to cut their club's throat. I was having a wee nosey and spotted this http://www.vanguardbears.co.uk/sfa-agenda-exposed-soon.html. For those that can't be bothered clicking, it says that the VBs have soon-to-be-released evidence highlighting the SFA's lack of integrity in their handling of "Ranger's 'punishment' upon entering administration'. Assuming this means that the VBs think the SFA imposed unlawful 'punishments', I think this may sting the authorities into action. They can either say that they punished Rangers using measures that were previously deemed to be outwith their armoury (confirming the VBs' case) OR... they admit that Rangers were a new team looking for entry into the professional leagues under exceptional circumstances and therefore could have any pre-conditions applied. Could get interesting. If anyone rises to the bait. The vanguards eh.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 (edited) Rangers never had a transfer embargo.....A player registration embargo then, and you are correct Rangers died before it could be imposed. Edited August 4, 2014 by stonedsailor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 A player registration embargo then, and you are correct Rangers died before it could be imposed. Och throw all the words you like. The simple truth is that this is not new news and why The VB try and make an issue can only be for one reason: To give the P&B diddies and plastics another feeding frenzy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 Och throw all the words you like. The simple truth is that this is not new news and why The VB try and make an issue can only be for one reason: To give the P&B diddies and plastics another feeding frenzy I doubt the VB care about us. They are too busy threatening their own support and cutting up red card. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 I think the Vanguard Bears may be about to cut their club's throat. I was having a wee nosey and spotted this http://www.vanguardbears.co.uk/sfa-agenda-exposed-soon.html. For those that can't be bothered clicking, it says that the VBs have soon-to-be-released evidence highlighting the SFA's lack of integrity in their handling of "Ranger's 'punishment' upon entering administration'. Assuming this means that the VBs think the SFA imposed unlawful 'punishments', I think this may sting the authorities into action. They can either say that they punished Rangers using measures that were previously deemed to be outwith their armoury (confirming the VBs' case) OR... they admit that Rangers were a new team looking for entry into the professional leagues under exceptional circumstances and therefore could have any pre-conditions applied. Could get interesting. If anyone rises to the bait. Vanguard Bears, they kept backing Whyte even after the club went into admit. says everything you need to know about their investigation skills 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 I doubt the VB care about us. They are too busy threatening their own support and cutting up red card. Hey I am privy to VB minutes and you are next on the hit list 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 Hey I am privy to VB minutes and you are next on the hit list Oh noes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 SFA have done them a favour tbh. Usual shameless shite from McSalary. Absolutely astounding that the thicko's continue to lap it up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 SFA uphold Mohsni ban Rangers defender Bilel Mohsni will miss the Ibrox outfit's opening two games of the season after the Scottish Football Association upheld his sending-off against Derby on Saturday. Jonnybhoy back posting about his big team. Thanks JB. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 Rangers and Kinky: Two inbreds creating diddy hilarity for fucking ages.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 Probably nothing... keith jackson @tedermeatballs · 36m Here's a wee question. How much did HMRC know about Craig Whyte's tax dodging tendencies BEFORE he bought RFC? keith jackson @tedermeatballs · 17s Full story and reaction from a furious Alastair Johnston in tomorrow's @Daily_Record 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.