Monkey Tennis Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Ted's done this before. He'll say that the trust gave the loans, ignoring that it received its funding from Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 More what you missed out but as you already know this, I'll leave you to it. Indulge me here Bennett. What are you meaning? I honestly don't know. I don't think I'm saying much today, that I've not said all along. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Is that because they were wages and not in fact loans ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 I enjoy pointing out the inaccuracies of people claiming what happened to Rangers was somehow unique...it really wasn't. Yep. Death. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Tedi= lol 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Indulge me here Bennett. What are you meaning? I honestly don't know. I don't think I'm saying much today, that I've not said all along. Strange considering we've discussed this same thing previously and you partially agreed with me (as you tend to do). -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Strange considering we've discussed this same thing previously and you partially agreed with me (as you tend to do). Oh, stop being all cryptic and attempting to be interesting. What exactly are you on about? I quite often find myself agreeing with you as it happens - you're sometimes right. It would be good though if you could be clearer here on how I've apparently attempted to re-write history or something. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10menwent2mow Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 What round of the league cup did The Rangers enter in season 2012/13?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farrah Swango Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 What round of the league cup did The Rangers enter in season 2012/13??The round that new teams entered in I think. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 What round of the league cup did The Rangers enter in season 2012/13??They snuffed it before it startit. Ha ha ha ha ha 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 The round that new teams entered in I think. yawwn - were all the third divison teams new then dumbass? heres what was said at the time “Under the Scottish FA’s Cup Competition Rules, Rangers FC as a third division club will join the William Hill Scottish Cup at the second round.” This was clarified after Rangers were put in division 3 to remove the confusion over this, as there were two conflicting rules, neither of which had any bearing on whether Rangers were a new club added to that the organisations that make the rules have stated unequivocally that we are the same club -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 yawwn - were all the third divison teams new then dumbass? heres what was said at the time “Under the Scottish FA’s Cup Competition Rules, Rangers FC as a third division club will join the William Hill Scottish Cup at the second round.” This was clarified after Rangers were put in division 3 to remove the confusion over this, as there were two conflicting rules, neither of which had any bearing on whether Rangers were a new club added to that the organisations that make the rules have stated unequivocally that we are the same club From the same website...... .The Scottish FA issued a guidance note, based on legal advice and without prejudice, to both Rangers FC and PFA Scotland. Certain players have now chosen not to transfer across under TUPE regulations and, instead, agreed contracts elsewhere. On a procedural basis, the Scottish FA cannot process an International Transfer Certificate via FIFA’s Transfer Management System where there is an ongoing contractual dispute. Rangers FC have confirmed that there is such a contractual dispute. In the meantime, the new club(s) can request a temporary transfer from FIFA in order that the player(s) is free to play while the dispute process unfolds. This process has commenced in relation to a number of the players in question. ......new club 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranaldo Bairn Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 nacho, on 13 Oct 2015 - 17:35, said: yawwn - were all the third divison teams new then dumbass? heres what was said at the time “Under the Scottish FA’s Cup Competition Rules, Rangers FC as a third division club will join the William Hill Scottish Cup at the second round.” This was clarified after Rangers were put in division 3 to remove the confusion over this, as there were two Rangers Football Clubs , added to that the organisations that depend on the bigoted pound have stated unequivocally that we are the same club FTFY. Oh, and if you call someone a dumbass (woo! Spring Break! Woo!!), you'd better at least refer to the correct competition. I blame the Mordorian education system. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 From the same website...... .The Scottish FA issued a guidance note, based on legal advice and without prejudice, to both Rangers FC and PFA Scotland. Certain players have now chosen not to transfer across under TUPE regulations and, instead, agreed contracts elsewhere. On a procedural basis, the Scottish FA cannot process an International Transfer Certificate via FIFA’s Transfer Management System where there is an ongoing contractual dispute. Rangers FC have confirmed that there is such a contractual dispute. In the meantime, the new club(s) can request a temporary transfer from FIFA in order that the player(s) is free to play while the dispute process unfolds. This process has commenced in relation to a number of the players in question. ......new club read that again and have a wee think about what it means - clue the new clubs are something to do with the players and have nothing to do with rangers who are mentioned by name numerous times in the paragraph 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 FTFY. Oh, and if you call someone a dumbass (woo! Spring Break! Woo!!), you'd better at least refer to the correct competition. I blame the Mordorian education system. i am referrring to the correct competition, rangers are the same club, the rules were clarified at the time and have nothing to do with the clubs status, everyone credible who has commented says we are the same club, you have nothing backing up your new club pish and you are a dumbass due to the level of your argument - come up with a decent logical non strawman argument why you think rangers are a new club backed up with some evidence and i will treat you with some respect , dumbass -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 i am referrring to the correct competition, rangers are the same club, the rules were clarified at the time and have nothing to do with the clubs status, everyone credible who has commented says we are the same club, you have nothing backing up your new club pish and you are a dumbass due to the level of your argument - come up with a decent logical non strawman argument why you think rangers are a new club backed up with some evidence and i will treat you with some respect , dumbass OT but since you seem in a loquacious mood, maybe you can answer this question, it's been puzzling me for some time and I can't get any (new) rangers fans to comment on it. How do you reconcile the old club voting in favour of allowing your new club to become a SPL member club? Only clubs can be members and only clubs have voting rights. Since there are obviously two clubs here do you just pretend it didn't happen? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranaldo Bairn Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 In the name of the wee man, the poster above referred to the LEAGUE CUP. You started wittering on about the SCOTTISH CUP. I've posted this several times, but since you're extremely stupid new here, here we go again. Rangers were formed in about 1873. In 1899 they incorporated into a company. That means they became one. They were not bought by anyone at that stage. They were bought later, eventually by the Murray Group. This was their 'holding company'. When Rangers went bust, a new club was formed. They were called Sevco Scotland, and were also a company. The two are not mutually exclusive you see? They bought Rangers' bibs n cones, and the right to ply their trade at Ibrox. Anyway, they changed their name to The Rangers. There was a vote to see where they should get placed in the league system. Old Rangers voted they should start in the SPL. This is the club you now support, and their holding company is Rangers International. This is who all the looyalllll berrrrzzz bought shares in a couple of years ago. It's all extremely simple. If it's causing you problems, please refer to every single fucking journalist AND RANGERS FAN before summer 2012, who stated quite explicitly that liquidation meant the death of Rangers 1873. Even Charles Green, who gave you a club to support! Or continue your amoeba-brained self-deception. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 Wrong and Wrong...Rangers never gave any loans to players. Good news for HMRC hope you'll testify 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 yawwn - were all the third divison teams new then dumbass? heres what was said at the time “Under the Scottish FA’s Cup Competition Rules, Rangers FC as a third division club will join the William Hill Scottish Cup at the second round.” This was clarified after Rangers were put in division 3 to remove the confusion over this, as there were two conflicting rules, neither of which had any bearing on whether Rangers were a new club added to that the organisations that make the rules have stated unequivocally that we are the same club The spelling, the grammar....must be Forever_ontheglue. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 i am referrring to the correct competition, rangers are the same club, the rules were clarified at the time and have nothing to do with the clubs status, everyone credible who has commented says we are the same club, you have nothing backing up your new club pish and you are a dumbass due to the level of your argument - come up with a decent logical non strawman argument why you think rangers are a new club backed up with some evidence and i will treat you with some respect , dumbass Why did this same club have to rejoin the league? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.