Monkey Tennis Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Will never forget it mate, matched only by Gough's late equaliser in the 2-2 draw two seasons previous, the atmosphere back in those days was something else!! Yes, sectarian bile was allowed to be belted out back then. You must have loved it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Shouldn't be surprised really, it was that attitude of not giving a f**k that helped push the old club over the edge. It is amazing isn't it, that after everything that's happened, you still get Rangers fans saying they don't care about that sort of stuff? I don't think the trouble they get into as a club, is entirely unrelated to such a prevalent attitude either. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythstoliveby Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 It is amazing isn't it, that after everything that's happened, you still get Rangers fans saying they don't care about that sort of stuff? I don't think the trouble they get into as a club, is entirely unrelated to such a prevalent attitude either. It's the fans that are 100% to blame for the demise of rangers -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-MAN Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Morning Cavemen. The rain has stopped, the Sun is out. The Sheep Shaggers reveal their finances. Thought we were the next for Admin....GIRFUY 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 What a game, what a goal eh!? How did you feel about Rangers signing a Celtic supporting Catholic Rob? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 A profitable year for the dons recording a record turnover. Ahhh when will Armageddon end? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mortar Bored Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Ahhh when will Armageddon end? Hopefully, never! The game in Scotland is much more interesting now, if only we could get rid of the East End footballing carbuncle, we could truly have a competitive top division and start to sell the Premiership as an exciting prospect. Not that I'm too fussed about the TV income, just want a good league to watch... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythstoliveby Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Sink us and we'll sink you! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Sink us and we'll sink you! So far, so good. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 How did you feel about Rangers signing a Celtic supporting Catholic Rob? Never crossed my mind when the ball hit the back of the net tbh Mikey! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyc13 Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Never crossed my mind when the ball hit the back of the net tbh Mikey! Celebrating a goal scored twenty odd years ago by a club that cheated and subsequently got liquidated.... Good times for ra peepul ...how is the wee c**t, heard he is in hospital? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 JJ again landing jabs , conspiracies ahoy !! A quick look at The Court of Session rolls reveals the following: LADY WOLFFE R Martin, Clerk Tuesday 24th November By Order 1 P989/15 Pet: Michael Ashley for Judicial Review Brodies LLP Burness Paull LLP 2 P1039/15 Pet: Mash Holdings Ltd for Judicial Review Brodies LLP Anderson Strathern LLP Burness Paull LLP Both petitions were originally submitted to the Court of Session for Judicial Review on the 17th November. They are being heard, and opposed, on Tuesday of next week. It is interesting to note that Lady Wolffe is married to Dean of Faculty, James Wolffe QC, who represented Rangers in the recent petition brought by Charles Green in regard to his legal costs. Anderson Strathern, the employer of Rangers secretary James Blair, instructed Mr Wolffe. In a surprising development, they are co- respondents with another firm, Burness Paull LLP. It would be imprudent to speculate at this point, but if Mr Ashley is seeking any injunctions, then they would be heard on Tuesday, three days prior to the AGM. Level 5 are fully engaged on discrediting Mike Ashley and promoting King prior to the AGM. The fact that King lied, on more levels than 5, to the shareholders on his investment of £30m, will be buried under a blitz of Level 5 churnalism in the coming week. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 And re LNS , his judgement was based on that the clubs use of ebt's were lawful. Which they were not. So grounds to reopen 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Never crossed my mind when the ball hit the back of the net tbh Mikey! And there was me thinking you were a staunch loyalist. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 And re LNS , his judgement was based on that the clubs use of ebt's were lawful. Which they were not. So grounds to reopen That does, on the face of it, sound like grounds for reopening. However, this business of the SPL apparently accepting that the commission proceed on the basis of the situation as it stood, even though it was open to appeal, looks problematic. You'd imagine that such a stipulation could surely be open to some kind of challenge though. Either way, it's clear that if Rangers do cling onto these titles ultimately, then it's not on the basis that they deserved to. They should really still be accompanied by an asterisk in the records, to establish that they only belong to Rangers due to a technical quirk. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 And re LNS , his judgement was based on that the clubs use of ebt's were lawful. Which they were not. So grounds to reopen The sad thing is that the deluded idiot believes what he has posted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 The sad thing is that the deluded idiot believes what he has posted. I don't understand. Is that not accurate? Was it created by a Timposters and not really part of the commission's process at all? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 I don't understand. Is that not accurate? Was it created by a Timposters and not really part of the commission's process at all? You have to consider the previous sentence for it to make sense, of course. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 You have to consider the previous sentence for it to make sense, of course. Ah, you're pouncing on this "lawful" thing again as if that's the point. The point that the scheme was not operated successfully stands fully. It's that basis that the commission went to work on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Ah, you're pouncing on this "lawful" thing again as if that's the point. The point that the scheme was not operated successfully stands fully. It's that basis that the commission went to work on. Oh don't you start too! Please don't tell me that this paragraph says that The SPL reserved the right to amend the decision of the LNS Commission based on the outcome of HMRCs appeal. You surely can't believe this is what the paragraph posted means? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.