The_Kincardine Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 they don't believe in Rangers as strongly as I do, I bet I'm a bigger Rangers fan than you. 100Kg BDO seeking leave to appeal makes not one jot of difference to Rangers. Company or club? Tedious pish. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Lol, as predicted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Lol, as predicted. What, exactly, is as predicted? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Further lol. Over the last 6 years, there have been 49 submissions to appeal to the Supreme Court from Scotland. They have heard 3. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 What, exactly, is as predicted? Party line followed precisely. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Party line followed precisely. And where does one find this party line? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 And where does one find this party line? Depends on how open your friends are with their habits. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 BDO seeking leave to appeal makes not one jot of difference to Rangers. Yes, that's the line you need to adopt. It's quite absurd though, isn't it. This ruling could result in a massive bill for what was Rangers. It doesn't however affect what Rangers is now, even though Rangers is exactly the same thing as it was. Wait - that makes no sense whatever. Seriously, where have I gone wrong? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Yes, that's the line you need to adopt. I just had a butchers at FF - and the posts I read regarded this as excellent news, so clearly there is 'more than one line'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 I just had a butchers at FF - and the posts I read regarded this as excellent news, so clearly there is 'more than one line'. I meant that it was the line you needed to adopt in attempting to maintain the mental contortions you've been performing. Care to explain where I went wrong in my previous post, in trying to outline your stance on why this has no effect on Rangers? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 I just had a butchers at FF - and the posts I read regarded this as excellent news, so clearly there is 'more than one line'. At this point it doesn't mean a massive amount. The appeal hasn't been granted yet. How common is it that they are? I imagine it would a relatively low number of judgements that they agreed to allow an appeal to? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Aye, it doesn't matter to Ramgers fans at all ,this appeal, unless they win it then they'll be jizzing over each other just like the last couple of times. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Further lol. Over the last 6 years, there have been 49 submissions to appeal to the Supreme Court from Scotland. They have heard 3. At this point it doesn't mean a massive amount. The appeal hasn't been granted yet. How common is it that they are? I imagine it would a relatively low number of judgements that they agreed to allow an appeal to? Coff..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 I meant that it was the line you needed to adopt in attempting to maintain the mental contortions you've been performing. There is no mental contortion nor need there be one 'line'. As mentioned, many fellow fans want a successful appeal whereas I'm indifferent. Care to explain where I went wrong in my previous post, in trying to outline your stance on why this has no effect on Rangers? No need. This has been covered amply over the past 3 years and, as you discuss Rangers more than I do, you're probably better versed in the range of opinions. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Coff..... Oops. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 (edited) BDO seeking leave to appeal makes not one jot of difference to Rangers. Makes zero difference to Rangers, what is funny is seeing halfwits like Phil and JJ getting it wrong so often, what is even funnier is watching guys like you hanging on their every word and donating your hard earned to support them, no wonder you live in a box.Rangers fans don't care about the appeallEta. Lol..where is the supreme court? Is it in the UK? Edited November 30, 2015 by THE KING 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 (edited) No need. This has been covered amply over the past 3 years and, as you discuss Rangers more than I do, you're probably better versed in the range of opinions.Ok, so I was right.Just to re-cap, this case could land old Rangers with a massive tax bill. This will however have no bearing on current Rangers. However, there is no difference whatever between old Rangers and the current version. They are absolutely one and the same thing. Nah, still doesn't seem to work. I wish you'd explain to me how it could possibly work. It might stop me blundering around in such ignorance. Edited November 30, 2015 by Monkey Tennis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 At this point it doesn't mean a massive amount. The appeal hasn't been granted yet. How common is it that they are? I imagine it would a relatively low number of judgements that they agreed to allow an appeal to? James Doleman @jamesdoleman 45m45 minutes ago Of 49 Scottish submissions to appeal to the Supreme Court in last 6 years, 3 were accepted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calum_gers Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 I hear there's been 49 submissions in the last 6 years, anyone got any idea how many were accepted? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 I wish you'd explain to me how it could possibly work. It might stop be me blundering around in such ignorance. I doubt even I could manage that 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.