The_Kincardine Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Don't be so bloody silly. Why on earth should Hector accept a fraction of what he's due? Yup. Hector played a blinder. He could've been +£10M to the good yet ends up down £xM - of course we don't know because 'he' refuses to tell us. Why the f**k are you and your pathetic Applepine pals cheerleading for an organisation who clearly made a right Horlicks of this? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Oh dear. The diddies obsessing about debentures again. Cue a post from the wee Peterhead bloke. You know it's bad when Benny is posting more reasoned thought than you are. Comic timing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Waldo Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Yup. Hector played a blinder. He could've been +£10M to the good yet ends up down £xM - of course we don't know because 'he' refuses to tell us. Why the f**k are you and your pathetic Applepine pals cheerleading for an organisation who clearly made a right Horlicks of this? HMRC do not accept anything but 100%. It will then go to the Highest court for a judge to decide. This is how laws are made on this country.It's not too difficult to understand. It made 'your type' of EBTs illegal and closed a tax loophole with a loss to public purse of what it collects in about quarter of an hour (obviously a possible court case pending). And you don't need to be too clever to work out, that because of this, it would have collected more than £10 million from companies with the same set up. Personally, I don't see how anyone can think they didn't play it correctly. 'He refuses to tell' you because it breaches all sorts of confidentiality. I am sure you'd be first to complain if he published details about you just because someone asked. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 HMRC do not accept anything but 100%. Bollocks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Yup. Hector played a blinder. He could've been +£10M to the good yet ends up down £xM - of course we don't know because 'he' refuses to tell us. Why the f**k are you and your pathetic Applepine pals cheerleading for an organisation who clearly made a right Horlicks of this? Because they're very clearly the good guys. That's why I back them in this. I see Whyte, Green and Ashley as vile types who make the world a worse place. HMRC however, for all their flaws, are altogether different. I'm also delighted that they had the muscle to bring Rangers to their knees. It's rare to see such a might and right combo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 I'm also delighted that they had the muscle to bring Rangers to their knees. The Applepines call the tune and Monkey dances to it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xj2011 Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Why on earth would Her Majesty's accept a pitiful offer two Million pounds less than you paid for Tore Andre Flo?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 The Applepines call the tune and Monkey dances to it. This, from the pointless old fool who laments an absence of genuine discussion on the thread. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 The pursuit of Rangers by HMRC is as much to do with setting precedent to open the floodgates as it is to collect the cash from Oldco. £10 million is chicken feed while compared to the grander scheme of things. Plus: Some of the definitions of 'debt' on here are fucking hilarious. Strichener repeatedly shouting 'DEBENTURES!' while every poster completely ignores him is hugely frustrating. Anyhoo, on a completely unrelated subject: What about the debentures? Any comment? Are debentures not debt now? Did youngsy receive a sack with a dollar sign on the side of it from the RFFF? That's what is being suggested. What about the football debt that hasn't been paid yet? http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/30510604That not count either? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 This, from the pointless old fool who laments an absence of genuine discussion on the thread. Shine-swilling banjo plucker in faux outrage. How much did taking the Lawwell shilling cost you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Knock yourself out. Come back to me if you find anyone keen to fund the guy's idiocy . Putting words in peoples mouths again..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 Shine-swilling banjo plucker in faux outrage. How much did taking the Lawwell shilling cost you? Dear oh dear. How frightfully humiliating for you to have posted such a thing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 Can I be the first today to mention bloggers? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 Can I be the first today to mention bloggers? "May I", Ken, "may I". After all the English lessons on here, too... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 Vicky will be raging. Bennett won't be pleased, either... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 "May I", Ken, "may I". After all the English lessons on here, too... that's me telt! (cracks open a may of special brew to drown sorrows) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 that's me telt! (cracks open a may of special brew to drown sorrows) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 Comic timing. Nearly two hours apart. The only thing that is comic in this whole thing is your "let's discuss the issues (as long as they are my issues) stance" Anyway, any answer on the debentures yet? How about a definition of small creditors? Or even proof that these small creditors have been paid by RFFF? No? Thought not. Carry on with your comedy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 2 days now, has TEDI got his list of the Hundreds of small creditors that we're all paid off by the RFFF yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 2 days now, has TEDI got his list of the Hundreds of small creditors that we're all paid off by the RFFF yet? Let's start at the beginning. Baby steps for Tedi. What amount of Rangers debt defines a creditor as being small? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.