Reynard Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 both these things are very plausible. britain and the usa have been talking about supplying arms to the very same people, it is in israels interests to destabilise syria and oust the muslim brotherhood from govt in a country it borders, the world is a very murky place I don't know why anyone would dismiss anything out of hand. good article you posted too btw. Hmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 theres a lot of stupid people who think they're clever on this site Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 theres a lot of stupid people who think they're clever on this site Its a great job that we have you around to keep those morons in check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placidcasual Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Regardless of any intervention, it's going to end up in a horrible civil war along sectarian lines. I've no idea why the UN, the US etc would want to get their fingerprints on this one too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Its a great job that we have you around to keep those morons in check. thats not my place, just reading their posts does that for anyone with a brain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain kirk Posted August 27, 2013 Author Share Posted August 27, 2013 Its bollox set up from InfoWars. About as plausible as the tooth fairy. Not saying its true ...but its a good set up if they came up with it 8 months ago? Btw anyone got the latest on Sadams WMD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Regardless of any intervention, it's going to end up in a horrible civil war along sectarian lines. I've no idea why the UN, the US etc would want to get their fingerprints on this one too. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP3mXVRd89Y Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Regardless of any intervention, it's going to end up in a horrible civil war along sectarian lines. I've no idea why the UN, the US etc would want to get their fingerprints on this one too. It already is. Which side should we back then? The hard man dictator who seems to lean towards the Russians? Or the Islamic fundamentalist types who will turn the place into some sort of horrible middle ages type religious state? Flip that coin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Not saying its true ...but its a good set up if they came up with it 8 months ago? Btw anyone got the latest on Sadams WMD? you mean the wmd that the british and american governments said they know where they are? the ones in the areas "north south east and west of bagdhad"? or the mobiles ones in the back of trucks that wmd experts said were completely impossible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 It already is. Which side should we back then? The hard man dictator who seems to lean towards the Russians? Or the Islamic fundamentalist types who will turn the place into some sort of horrible middle ages type religious state? Flip that coin. why should we back either? the un's role should be a peacekeeping one no more no less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placidcasual Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 It already is. Which side should we back then? The hard man dictator who seems to lean towards the Russians? Or the Islamic fundamentalist types who will turn the place into some sort of horrible middle ages type religious state? Flip that coin. Neither. Let them get on with it. Democracy evidently doesn't work in the Middle East. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain kirk Posted August 27, 2013 Author Share Posted August 27, 2013 Regardless of any intervention, it's going to end up in a horrible civil war along sectarian lines. I've no idea why the UN, the US etc would want to get their fingerprints on this one too. Looks like Syria will be to busy to do anything about this ..thats lucky http://www.businessinsider.com/israel-grants-golan-heights-oil-license-2013-2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Looks like Syria will be to busy to do anything about this ..thats lucky http://www.businessinsider.com/israel-grants-golan-heights-oil-license-2013-2 another great article. very illuminating too, and obscenely wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain kirk Posted August 27, 2013 Author Share Posted August 27, 2013 you mean the wmd that the british and american governments said they know where they are? the ones in the areas "north south east and west of bagdhad"? or the mobiles ones in the back of trucks that wmd experts said were completely impossible? Yes or else they would have launched them straight into Israel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 indeed, if they actually had any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 why should we back either? the un's role should be a peacekeeping one no more no less. We shouldn't. But it looks like we are about to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 we already are, we're simply about to escalate that massively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 we already are, we're simply about to escalate that massively. Looks like it. I wouldn't be looking to the UN for any leadership,its a waste of everyones time. Whats the worst case scenario for the West here? The spread of Islamic fundamentalism or a Meditteranean border for the likes of China or Russia? I'm not really sure to be honest. Both would make things twitchy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 it seems the worst case scenario is assad stays in power, as thats what they are scheming to try to prevent. after that who knows, anything could happen. I really do think this is the beginning of ww3, a lot of people have been predicting this for a long time, and its all coming true before our eyes. here are two good videos http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbMdll58lis a year ago about false flag chemical attack in syria http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SciH36NZR1U&feature=c4-overview&list=UU4unV5BVmWubfAF0Al_AVdw a few days ago after it actually happened. try and ignore alex jones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madwullie Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Always find it ironic that those who are quick to discount reports in western media about events as propaganda and lies are equally as quick to believe any other article hastily typed up by f**k knows who in his sweaty bedroom when posted on certain counter culture websites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.