Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 448
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Isn't it ironic that America is claiming that the chemical attack is an outrage when they have done nothing but cause the deaths of over a million people in Iraq and elsewhere since 1980?

Real reason is that they want to control and manipulate a country that has been manipulated by outside forces for hundreds of years.

What is the difference between Syria and Saudi Arabia?

Both are dictatorships controlled by a tribe.

One plays ball and the other doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it seems the worst case scenario is assad stays in power, as thats what they are scheming to try to prevent.  after that who knows, anything could happen.  I really do think this is the beginning of ww3, a lot of people have been predicting this for a long time, and its all coming true before our eyes.

 

 

here are two good videos

 

  a year ago about false flag chemical attack in syria

 

  a few days ago after it actually happened.  try and ignore alex jones.

:lol:

World war 3? Tin hat stuff there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you should read some stuff zbigniew brezinski (sp) has written. he basically runs america, and thats what he says. obama takes his orders from him, he probably takes his orders from the rockefellers.

He takes his orders from 12 foot tall lizards surely...........

Cam_M_1742260a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always find it ironic that those who are quick to discount reports in western media about events as propaganda and lies are equally as quick to believe any other article hastily typed up by f**k knows who in his sweaty bedroom when posted on certain counter culture websites.

Indeed.

I'm sure our resident nutjobs will be just as critical of Russia and Iran propping up a murderous authoritarian regime. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it ironic that America is claiming that the chemical attack is an outrage when they have done nothing but cause the deaths of over a million people in Iraq and elsewhere since 1980?

Real reason is that they want to control and manipulate a country that has been manipulated by outside forces for hundreds of years.

What is the difference between Syria and Saudi Arabia?

Both are dictatorships controlled by a tribe.

One plays ball and the other doesn't.

excellent post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what articles you're referring to, nobody has posted anything of the sort on this thread.

Respect, never seen such on obvious wind up since Capn Sensible.

You are David Cameron's sock puppet ripping the pish out of the gullible anti west muppets.

bravo_logo.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you see people like you lower the tone of the debate. nobody mentioned these things. you're probably best ignored.

Loving it, keep it up.

First post, 25 August, too much of a giveaway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats a good question and one that nobody can definitively answer. there probably is no answer set in stone yet, all we know is what the sides will be, china and russia on one side and us on the other, us using syria to provoke a conflict with russia is how it will most likely start, the details as in actual events probably haven't been worked out yet. anyone looking at it objectively couldn't deny this is the most dangerous time for the world since the end of the cold war, look at the rhetoric coming out of both sides, its clear this is a moment of extremely high tension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not saying its true ...but its a good set up if they came up with it 8 months ago? Btw anyone got the latest on Sadams WMD?

Or even Saddam's?

The Green Brigade stole them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats a good question and one that nobody can definitively answer. there probably is no answer set in stone yet, all we know is what the sides will be, china and russia on one side and us on the other, us using syria to provoke a conflict with russia is how it will most likely start, the details as in actual events probably haven't been worked out yet. anyone looking at it objectively couldn't deny this is the most dangerous time for the world since the end of the cold war, look at the rhetoric coming out of both sides, its clear this is a moment of extremely high tension.

I thought all China needeed to do to "win" was to ask the USA for it's wedge back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...