QPSAFalkirkFirm Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 http://www.yesscotland.net/news/no-campaign-vow-unravels-within-24-hours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Pretty desperate stuff really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Anyone who buys this "extra powers" shite is as gullible as a 3 year old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NormanSaysNo Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 I like the pledge to "fully protect the NHS". That'll be continuing the sterling job they're currently doing that's lead to "continued commitments" which are "directly in conflict" and "not fully funded", leading to a funding gap of £400-£450m in the next two financial years. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-29213416 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well Well Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 I like the pledge to "fully protect the NHS". That'll be continuing the sterling job they're currently doing that's lead to "continued commitments" which are "directly in conflict" and "not fully funded", leading to a funding gap of £400-£450m in the next two financial years. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-29213416 So with a £4B cut in the Barnett formula that is going to get a hell of a lot worse under a No vote don't you think. With all the taxes staying Scotland we can reverse it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 I like the pledge to "fully protect the NHS". That'll be continuing the sterling job they're currently doing that's lead to "continued commitments" which are "directly in conflict" and "not fully funded", leading to a funding gap of £400-£450m in the next two financial years. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-29213416 Which has already been done to death as yet another reason for voting Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 I like the pledge to "fully protect the NHS". That'll be continuing the sterling job they're currently doing that's lead to "continued commitments" which are "directly in conflict" and "not fully funded", leading to a funding gap of £400-£450m in the next two financial years. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-29213416 Indeed. We all know that an Independent Scotland will face no budget cuts, or will even have to bother deciding what to spend money on. Every department will be fully funded, with as much of a budget as it would like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Indeed. We all know that an Independent Scotland will face no budget cuts, or will even have to bother deciding what to spend money on. Every department will be fully funded, with as much of a budget as it would like. Indeed. This is what happens when you keep your oil money and get Trident to f**k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NormanSaysNo Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 So with a £4B cut in the Barnett formula that is going to get a hell of a lot worse under a No vote don't you think. It would, if that were remotely true. If it is true, I'm sure you'll have no trouble providing some documentary evidence that this will be the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colkitto Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Indeed. We all know that an Independent Scotland will face no budget cuts, or will even have to bother deciding what to spend money on. Every department will be fully funded, with as much of a budget as it would like. Do you still believe Cameron played a blinder in the Edinburgh Agreement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Do you still believe Cameron played a blinder in the Edinburgh Agreement? Absolutely. As we've discussed before, a No vote will mean Cameron owned Salmond in Edinburgh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colkitto Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Absolutely. As we've discussed before, a No vote will mean Cameron owned Salmond in Edinburgh. Good, just checking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 It would, if that were remotely true. If it is true, I'm sure you'll have no trouble providing some documentary evidence that this will be the case. I like how you believe everything Westminster feed you, yet throw up a brick wall regarding Yes stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NormanSaysNo Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 I like how you believe everything Westminster feed you, yet throw up a brick wall regarding Yes stats. Ah, putting words into my mouth again, I see. For the record, I don't believe much of what Westminster feeds me. Neither do I believe much of what I hear from Holyrood either. However, I notice that your criticism of me is a convenient excuse for you not to provide any evidence to back up your claims. Handy that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 However, I notice that your criticism of me is a convenient excuse for you not to provide any evidence to back up your claims. Handy that. Um, it wasn't me that made the initial claim, even though it is correct. Don't you have google? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KR88 Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 I like how you believe everything Westminster feed you, yet throw up a brick wall regarding Yes stats. But you have no yes stats... All ifs buts and maybes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taffy mactavish Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 VE HAFF VEYS OF MAKING YOU LOOSE YOUR SHIRT IM IN CHARGE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.