H_B Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Well, since you've chickened out of responding to the last two posts Which posts are these? I would need to have read the entire media to be able to comment on whether their views on Balotelli have been balanced or fair. I have absolutely no interest in the media. Still, I can understand why yuo wish to move things away from Balotelli's performances this season, onto some bizarre discussion of media fairness. I'd rather discuss what he's provided as a player. It's been absolutely woeful. He looks completely out of his depth playing for a top 4 team in a league like the Premiership. A continuation of his poor Man City form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SodjesSixteenIncher Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 "some bizarre discussion of media fairness." The thread is called Sky Sports abuse of Balotelli. Discussing the media here isn't that bizarre, given it's the subject of the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 "some bizarre discussion of media fairness." The thread is called Sky Sports abuse of Balotelli. Discussing the media here isn't that bizarre, given it's the subject of the thread. I wasn't aware "Sky sports" = the media. Thanks for that update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supras Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Which posts are these? I would need to have read the entire media to be able to comment on whether their views on Balotelli have been balanced or fair. I have absolutely no interest in the media. Still, I can understand why yuo wish to move things away from Balotelli's performances this season, onto some bizarre discussion of media fairness. I'd rather discuss what he's provided as a player. It's been absolutely woeful. He looks completely out of his depth playing for a top 4 team in a league like the Premiership. A continuation of his poor Man City form. The ones quoted....I made it simple for you and everything! Poor HB His goalscoring record was actually pretty good for Man City. But anyway, nothing detracts from the huge error that came earlier in the post. You would have to "read the entire media" in order to give any comment on the media, good lord "some bizarre discussion of media fairness." The thread is called Sky Sports abuse of Balotelli. Discussing the media here isn't that bizarre, given it's the subject of the thread. Well quite, it seems to be something everyone else in the world is capable of, but not HB. I must tell Jon Stewart that the Daily Show isn't really valid because he isn't able to watch every news programme on earth I knew this question would trip him up, but I didn't know that after a stumble he would willingly throw himself off a cliff. You can't plan for disasters like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supras Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 I wasn't aware "Sky sports" = the media. Thanks for that update. Can you comment on newspapers without reading every newspaper on earth? Be specific. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 His goalscoring record was actually pretty good for Man City. But anyway, nothing detracts from the huge error that came earlier in the post. What was his Man City goalscoring record? Which error are you referring to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Can you comment on newspapers without reading every newspaper on earth? Be specific. Which newspapers. Specifically. I can't comment on newspapers I don't read. No. I am very talented, but that is beyond my powers. It is also impossible to determine is "the media" coverage of Balotelli is balanced and fair without reading "the media" coverage of Balotelli in its entirety. I know you aren't the brightest, but didn't expect this would have to be explained to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supras Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Which error are you referring to? "I would need to have read the entire media" This. 100% this. Were my signature not too long, it would straight in there. As it is, your earlier disasters are still just a little bit better. "I would need to have read the entire media" It gets funnier every time you read it His goalscoring record at Man City is public knowledge but lets not distract from the truly hilarious thing to emerge from the thread. Looks like you're gunning to push "1 assist in his entire career" off top spot - I think you can do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Well, I think this is progress. You have realised the entire premise of your question was ridiculous and you've made a complete and utter c**t of this. Usually takes much longer to arrive here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Wasn't he driving round giving cash to folk too? Definitely not an attention seeker. Dressed as Santa no less Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supras Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Well, I think this is progress. You have realised the entire premise of your question was ridiculous and you've made a complete and utter c**t of this. Usually takes much longer to arrive here. "I would need to have read the entire media" Yip, bluster, you'll need it. The question was valid, your answer was hilarious. You dodged a gentle slope but jumping on a landmine. Hilarious viewing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Why is a comedy show as valid as my last shite getting brought up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supras Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Why is a comedy show as valid as my last shite getting brought up? Er, okay. Which part of this incredibly simple point did you not get? Be specific. Also, poor HB, I'm sure he thought he would be saved by the lock. Instead this will get dragged out to its devastating conclusion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraser Fyvie Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 It's not true, unsurprisingly. The most gullible member of P&B thought it might be It is true according to highly-regarded stats website whoscored.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 It is true according to highly-regarded stats website whoscored.com What is? The one assist in his entire career? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraser Fyvie Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 What is? The one assist in his entire career? In the Premier League. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 In the Premier League. In his entire career? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraser Fyvie Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 In his entire career? One Premier League assist in his career, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 One Premier League assist in his career, yes. But the assist in question was the one that won the title in injury time (the final game of his Man City days) was it not? I vaguely remember this being quoted at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 When folk say 'Be specific' do they actually expect it to happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.