Ira Gaines Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Shut up thundercunt. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Is this the right thread for the US Republican debates? Anyway, going great.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Willie Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Going to head round in circles here mate, Scottish voters decided on Scotland's place in the world, (well a sizeable majority of us did). I don't recall reading anywhere on the ballot paper, 'Do you wish to be ruled by England'? But surely that is implicit when you voted no. Do you really believe that Scotland isnae ruled by English politicians. Rob they hae roughly ten times the politicians ergo ten times the votes. They do have the last say on Scotlands position in the world and no the Scottish people. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
microdave Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 John Swinney, Jenny Marra, Ruth Davidson, Willie Rennie, Patrick Harvie and some guy from the Telegraph from Dundee tomorrow night. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 John Swinney, Jenny Marra, Ruth Davidson, Willie Rennie, Patrick Harvie and some guy from the Telegraph from Dundee tomorrow night. No David Coburn? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRuffian Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 FFS. A panel like that and an audience of Dundonians? Left to wee Ruth again to provide the only semblance of sanity. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 No David Coburn?I said I'd be delighted if they didn't include Coburn (not realising they'd shoot their load with de Bours last week), but my reaction is more akin to this: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewDon Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 The panelist from The Telegraph is Tim Stanley. It's probably unwise to admit this, but I actually quite like him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 On another note, do the Lib Dems really have no one other than that unpleasant, nasty little rodent Rennie? One can almost *taste* the grease coming off the guy, the "sweetie wife" facade having been well and truly shattered over the last few years. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob the tank Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 FFS. A panel like that and an audience of Dundonians? Left to wee Ruth again to provide the only semblance of sanity. My Team - Rangers Colour me surprised... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Has kevthedee got a ticket for this. His cutting political insight should not be limited to readers of these boards, he deserves a national audience. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Willie Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 exactly if you want the facts go online or something wotad I enjoy watching Nigel Farage on QT as it's usually him against the rest and I like tae root for the underdog. There's one question that I would love tae ask him. He goes on forever about how it's the unelected officials in Europe that's causing the UK problems. What's the party line nearer home with the unelected c**ts in the Lords? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 wotad I enjoy watching Nigel Farage on QT as it's usually him against the rest and I like tae root for the underdog. There's one question that I would love tae ask him. He goes on forever about how it's the unelected officials in Europe that's causing the UK problems. What's the party line nearer home with the unelected c**ts in the Lords? To be fair, Farage doesn't seem to care much about the Lords. UKIP has only two Peers, both wealthy defectors from the Tories who don't seem to do much now. There has been the odd moan from Farage about UKIP not getting any more Peers. The main parties nominate their big donors, cronies of the Leader, general election losers, has-beens and party hacks. I'd clear them all out and elect a much smaller Senate using proportion representation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 To be fair, Farage doesn't seem to care much about the Lords. UKIP has only two Peers, both wealthy defectors from the Tories who don't seem to do much now. There has been the odd moan from Farage about UKIP not getting any more Peers. The main parties nominate their big donors, cronies of the Leader, general election losers, has-beens and party hacks. I'd clear them all out and elect a much smaller Senate using proportion representation. It seems a strange line of attack on UKIP's part to condemn the EU for having appointed political positions and undemocratic processes, whilst ignoring (even celebrating) the UK having appointed (and hereditary) political positions and undemocratic processes. I suppose the problem is that at European level they're *foreigners*, not good old British lords, cabinet members and commissioners. Tally Ho! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WullieBroonIsGod Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Willie Rennie to use the line "you lost the referendum!" NAP Paddy Harvie though, sum boi 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Willie Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 To be fair, Farage doesn't seem to care much about the Lords. UKIP has only two Peers, both wealthy defectors from the Tories who don't seem to do much now. There has been the odd moan from Farage about UKIP not getting any more Peers. The main parties nominate their big donors, cronies of the Leader, general election losers, has-beens and party hacks. I'd clear shoot them all out and elect a much smaller Senate using proportion representation. That's no really the point is it. Does his party have any plans to do away with them or is he quite content to support them as long as he gets more UKIP Lords. You must have seen him on QT rabbiting on about the unelected (does he mean by us?) Europeans interfering in UK politics but I have never ever heard him say the same about these c**ts. It seems a strange line of attack on UKIP's part to condemn the EU for having appointed political positions and undemocratic processes, whilst ignoring (even celebrating) the UK having appointed (and hereditary) political positions and undemocratic processes. I suppose the problem is that at European level they're *foreigners*, not good old British lords, cabinet members and commissioners. Tally Ho! Surely at least the Europeans have been elected by voters in their own countries. Or have I got it wrong? What about this c**t http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-29518722 It really makes me seethe that c**ts like that can bypass the democratic process and walk into responsible jobs. I wonder what Nigel thinks of him? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppino Impastato Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 The panelist from The Telegraph is Tim Stanley. It's probably unwise to admit this, but I actually quite like him. The guy who said he wishes Salmond would die, and a self professed raging BritNat. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewDon Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 The guy who said he wishes Salmond would die, and a self professed raging BritNat. Where and when exactly did Stanley say he wishes Salmond would die, out of interest? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppino Impastato Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 (edited) Where and when exactly did Stanley say he wishes Salmond would die, out of interest? Where and when exactly did Stanley say he wishes Salmond would die, out of interest?Live on the bbc about a year agoCourse if a Scottish nationalist had something similar the outrage would have shifted the planet off its axis and you'd still be hearing about it every day Edited March 10, 2016 by Peppino Impastato 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 It's supposed to be here but I didn't hear it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.