Bigbri Bairn2 Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Why should under 12's get in for free? I am only 10 so I can get lifted over the turnstile at Falkirk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the squirrel Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 I don't watch Hibs every week, so obviously I could be wrong here, but it seems strange to me that this downturn of theirs seems to have coincided with the arrival of Anthony Stokes. Is Stubbs upsetting things trying to accommodate him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostin' Kev Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Who would he be upsetting? He's definitely a first choice striker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 He's been one of the better players for weeks now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrDust Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 He's been one of the better players for weeks now.5 wins in 14 games with Stokes...11 wins in 14 previous 14 games He's been a good investment......maybe no for Hibs tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz FFC Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 5 wins in 14 games with Stokes... 11 wins in 14 previous 14 games He's been a good investment......maybe no for Hibs tho We should definitely talk about how much Stokes costs Hibs in wages Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrDust Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 We should definitely talk about how much Stokes costs Hibs in wagesYep the Sturgeon wannabe chairperson promoting the new share issue with the fact they raised around 500,000 from last share issue, which allowed them to finance a deal for Stokes.....Still, if he fires them to the treble, it will be money well spent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraser Fyvie Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 We should definitely talk about how much Stokes costs Hibs in wages How much are we paying him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distant Doonhamer Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 How much are we paying him? Too much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senor Bairn Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 How much are we paying him? Bpm told me 450 grand a week. Can't identity the source that told him unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Bpm told me 450 grand a week. Can't identity the source that told him unfortunately. Was it one of the prawn sannie brigade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Back Post Misses Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 ^^^goat two weans^^^ Just as I said unable to hold a serious debate. For what it worth not got kids under 12. Not that you will believe me mind you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Stubbs Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Stokes isn't the problem. Signing only central players in January when the warning signs were already there about the diamond, was the mistake. That's not a 20/20 hindsight thing either, just about every one of us on here wanted some wide options brought in then. If anything Stokes has been better than most. Not much he can do about teams tucking in and letting our not very good full backs hit the first man with crosses all day. We should definitely talk about how much Stokes costs Hibs in wages Alright then, how much is he costing us? Don't make a fool of yourself and say half a million. didnt you say you wouldnt swap places with rangers? Aye I did. Which was accurate. Is there supposed to be a point in that question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Back Post Misses Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Bpm told me 450 grand a week. Can't identity the source that told him unfortunately. All I heard was he was on around 10k at Celtic and clubs are paying around 25% of the parent club salary as a rule. It maybe more in stokes case it maybe less Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 ITK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senor Bairn Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Was it one of the prawn sannie brigade? Believe he got talking to papa smurf at the Alloa game. What struck the conversation off was that both couldn't see the game. That's what I was told anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Stubbs Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 A 25% loan rule would mean Falkirk can afford 1/4 of what Norwich pay guys they've bought for £1m. It took me about 30 seconds to find Peter Houston saying Norwich offered 5 or 10 times more than Falkirk were paying. Feel like that one hasn't really been thought through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Oh dear, Falkirk will have to start charging the U12s £22 a ticket to cover those sort of wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraser Fyvie Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 A 25% loan rule would mean Falkirk can afford 1/4 of what Norwich pay guys they've bought for £1m. It took me about 30 seconds to find Peter Houston saying Norwich offered 5 or 10 times more than Falkirk were paying. Feel like that one hasn't really been thought through. But it's a rule m8! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.