printer Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 Still waiting for specifics here. Not that I expect anything tbh. Specifically what elements of that deal made it a shambles?In your answer, perhaps you could include your opinion of what a normal level of NET profit percentage would be for a similar operation to the retail merchandising of football strips etc. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TavTastic Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 (edited) Joe Aribo scores against Brazil! His second goal for Nigeria in his second appearance. Lovely close control. A real talent and valuable rising asset: Edited October 13, 2019 by TavTastic 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 Good run into the box and a well taken goal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbie1872 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 7 hours ago, hearthammer said: I assume you can show that the old club and the old company held separate Corporation Tax numbers with HMRC and were run on a parallel basis under the banner of "the club" ?? It was the "company" that was naughty with Hector, you say ?? Which of the entities held the registrations of the players who were fully entitled to, and able to, "TUPE" over from rangers to sevco ?? This "engine room subsidiary" guff only emerged to give the impression and appearance of continuation. Can you explain the difference between your old, dead rangers (now rangers international) and Gretna (now Gretna 2008) other than the circa £160 million difference in unpaid taxes and national insurance ?? Gretna were correctly expelled from the SPL/SFA and the new entity had to start again in the lower leagues. What happened to the old rangers ?? "I assume you can show that the old club and the old company held separate Corporation Tax numbers with HMRC and were run on a parallel basis under the banner of "the club" ??" nope, because thats not how it works, the company ran the club and dealt with tax, similar story with tupe the difference between rangers and gretna is that newco bought rangers, no one bought gretna if you have any issues with the above, i suggest you take it up with lord nimmo, glennie, bannatyne or the supreme court who all confirmed club and company are seperate and the club continued under new ownership, who backs up your theories above? oh thats right nobody, you made them up in your head, they arent backed by any evidence and the expert evidence available proves they are a load of nonsense 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbie1872 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 6 hours ago, Dindeleux said: Also Robbie, if the club and company are separate please let me know how Rangers managed to go from the top flight to Division 3 despite finishing 2nd in the SPL the previous year? oh thats a hard one there was a vote that put us there 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearthammer Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 1 minute ago, robbie1872 said: "I assume you can show that the old club and the old company held separate Corporation Tax numbers with HMRC and were run on a parallel basis under the banner of "the club" ??" nope, because thats not how it works, the company ran the club and dealt with tax, similar story with tupe the difference between rangers and gretna is that newco bought rangers, no one bought gretna if you have any issues with the above, i suggest you take it up with lord nimmo, glennie, bannatyne or the supreme court who all confirmed club and company are seperate and the club continued under new ownership, who backs up your theories above? oh thats right nobody, you made them up in your head, they arent backed by any evidence and the expert evidence available proves they are a load of nonsense Nurse Ratched !!!! Nurse Ratched !!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 1 minute ago, robbie1872 said: oh thats a hard one there was a vote that put us there Any idea why my own team, for example, haven’t suffered such a vote? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbie1872 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, printer said: Still waiting for specifics here. Not that I expect anything tbh. look it up dummy, the deal was a shambles as we made much less money than previous deals or the current deal, a quick look through rangers and celtic accounts show the diffeence in money recieved at the time the jjb deal for example which was the one before ashleys deal made us 4.8 million per year compared to the 600 thousand we made in the first year of the ashley deal which was before the boycott started, this years deals make us somewhere between 5.4 million and 6 million Edited October 13, 2019 by robbie1872 spelling 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbie1872 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 1 minute ago, Dindeleux said: Any idea why my own team, for example, haven’t suffered such a vote? because your holding company didnt go into admin and fail to have a cva agreed, is there some reason you think these moronic questions would be in any way challenging? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 So why should a club suffer because of the failure of a holding company? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearthammer Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 6 minutes ago, robbie1872 said: "I assume you can show that the old club and the old company held separate Corporation Tax numbers with HMRC and were run on a parallel basis under the banner of "the club" ??" nope, because thats not how it works, the company ran the club and dealt with tax, similar story with tupe the difference between rangers and gretna is that newco bought rangers, no one bought gretna if you have any issues with the above, i suggest you take it up with lord nimmo, glennie, bannatyne or the supreme court who all confirmed club and company are seperate and the club continued under new ownership, who backs up your theories above? oh thats right nobody, you made them up in your head, they arent backed by any evidence and the expert evidence available proves they are a load of nonsense You know how things work - obviously. What was the name of the company that "ran the club" ?? Which entity cheated on the tax and NI ?? Which entity was placed into administration ?? From which entity did McGregor, Naismith et all walk away from under TUPE legislation - as was their right ?? Sevco bought the assets of the liquidated club rangers then changed the name to rangers international. Likewise, Gretna became Gretna 2008. Its called phoenixism. Nimmo Smith was a pre-determined set up with the outcome guaranteed. Was there no financial advantage conferred ?? As I told the wee sevconite, bennett, my interest in things here stems from the fact that the same Gavin Masterton, who allowed Murray unlimited credit at BOS, almost sunk Dunfermline by the same modus operandi. Unlike the club nouveau, the SPFL wouldn't have ripped up all their rules to keep The Pars like they did the newco. There's none so blind, . . . . . . . . . 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted October 13, 2019 Author Share Posted October 13, 2019 10 minutes ago, hearthammer said: As I told the wee sevconite, bennett, my interest in things here stems from the fact that the same Gavin Masterton, who allowed Murray unlimited credit at BOS, almost sunk Dunfermline by the same modus operandi. Unlike the club nouveau, the SPFL wouldn't have ripped up all their rules to keep The Pars like they did the newco. We have a thread with 14 Million views and almost a 1/4 million posts for this shite. Please stop spamming. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepundit Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 Good goal for Aribo against Brazil today. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 2 minutes ago, thepundit said: Good goal for Aribo against Brazil today. Apparently it's now the Bralt mk2, fitba to be discussed elsewhere. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted October 13, 2019 Author Share Posted October 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, thepundit said: Good goal for Aribo against Brazil today. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearthammer Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 14 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: We have a thread with 14 Million views and almost a 1/4 million posts for this shite. Please stop spamming. See no evil, hear . . . . . . . . . . The sevco way 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted October 13, 2019 Author Share Posted October 13, 2019 23 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: We have a thread with 14 Million views 4 minutes ago, hearthammer said: See no evil Idiot. Please stop spamming. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 Barisic starting for Croatia against the Welsh tonight, nice to see another Ger playing at this level. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killiefan Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 1 hour ago, robbie1872 said: because your holding company didnt go into admin and fail to have a cva agreed, is there some reason you think these moronic questions would be in any way challenging? Why didn’t you pay the face painter? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 5 hours ago, robbie1872 said: because your holding company didnt go into admin and fail to have a cva agreed -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.