AJF Posted September 15, 2020 Share Posted September 15, 2020 Over 22,000 posts on this thread. Romeo with 20,000 of them to his name. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted September 15, 2020 Share Posted September 15, 2020 43 minutes ago, AJF said: Over 22,000 posts on this thread. Romeo with 20,000 of them to his name. Romeo has only made 17,000 odd M8 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted September 15, 2020 Share Posted September 15, 2020 Romeo has only made 17,000 odd M8Here's me phoning in pretending to have a raging shaky voice. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted September 15, 2020 Share Posted September 15, 2020 3 minutes ago, Romeo said: Here's me phoning in pretending to have a raging shaky voice. And here's your debut on the big screen: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted September 15, 2020 Share Posted September 15, 2020 And here's your debut on the big screen: ^^^ not bothered 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted September 15, 2020 Share Posted September 15, 2020 5 minutes ago, Romeo said: 15 minutes ago, G51 said: And here's your debut on the big screen: ^^^ not bothered couldn't give two fucks 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJF Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 I found the differing views on each tackle here quite amusing to say the least when they are very similar in nature. I’m in no way saying there is any agenda at play, I just laugh at how inconsistent people’s views are. The double down to refuse to answer the question about the Jack tackle as well made me chuckle. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 I found the differing views on each tackle here quite amusing to say the least when they are very similar in nature. I’m in no way saying there is any agenda at play, I just laugh at how inconsistent people’s views are. The double down to refuse to answer the question about the Jack tackle as well made me chuckle. All the hoohah about was it or wasn't it a red and intent (jack red) , yet can't look to see that maybe it was used as a training point and that refs were coached not to see that as a red and of course first time a similar incident happens is against the original challengers club the moan is no consistency.Fwiw I thought Edwards would have been booked had Barasic not reacted in a manner that could have given him a potential second yellow. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJF Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 53 minutes ago, weirdcal said: All the hoohah about was it or wasn't it a red and intent (jack red) , yet can't look to see that maybe it was used as a training point and that refs were coached not to see that as a red and of course first time a similar incident happens is against the original challengers club the moan is no consistency. Fwiw I thought Edwards would have been booked had Barasic not reacted in a manner that could have given him a potential second yellow. Refs may have used it as a training point and came to a different conclusion following this, however I don’t really buy into that considering Rangers appealed Jack’s red card and the appeal got thrown out which signalled they believed the decision was 100% correct. Now a panel of referees have decided a very, very similar tackle warrants no further action. I think they made a mistake on Jack’s red as I don’t believe either of them warrant reds My point was more to highlight the hypocrisy of a pundit that seen the tackles in two very different ways and refused to answer questions on the Jack tackle. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelmen Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 I may be in the minority but didn’t think it was a foul. It looked to me that he kicked the ball and connected unintentionally with Morelos on the follow through. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 2 hours ago, AJF said: My point was more to highlight the hypocrisy of a pundit that seen the tackles in two very different ways and refused to answer questions on the Jack tackle. Asking a man in his 70's to remember a tackle from two years ago? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJF Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 9 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said: Asking a man in his 70's to remember a tackle from two years ago? He could’ve easily refreshed his memory, but the main point still stands that he had a vastly different view of two very similar tackles. It doesn’t matter if he could remember the Jack tackle, he still judged them differently. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, AJF said: He could’ve easily refreshed his memory, but the main point still stands that he had a vastly different view of two very similar tackles. It doesn’t matter if he could remember the Jack tackle, he still judged them differently. Pretty sure the guys talking about jack's tackle isn't Hugh M8? Edited September 16, 2020 by wastecoatwilly 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 https://twitter.com/SICKB0Y_/status/933786677272858626?s=20 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJF Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 32 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said: Pretty sure the guys talking about jack's tackle isn't Hugh M8? The first clip is his take on the Jack tackle at the time it happened, the second clip is his take on the Edwards tackle from the weekend. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 22 hours ago, G51 said: some incredible rage there right enough. rangers fans are absolutely seething!!! 22 hours ago, G51 said: not sure about anyone else, but this one guy speaks for me!!! 22 hours ago, G51 said: no rage pal, i'm just amused that you thought a guy posting that he "couldn't give two fucks" constituted anger 22 hours ago, G51 said: very upset by this. so upset in fact, that i couldn't give two fucks about it 21 hours ago, G51 said: couldn't give two fucks "Couldn't give two fucks" 41 minutes ago, G51 said: https://twitter.com/SICKB0Y_/status/933786677272858626?s=20 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 Just now, Romeo said: "Couldn't give two fucks" Do you not remember the SSB video of him reading that? It's very funny, you should watch it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, G51 said: Do you not remember the SSB video of him reading that? It's very funny, you should watch it. I don't listen to SSB, daft clips on twitter is enough. It used to be fairly amusing if there had been a controversial incident but they have been at the baiting fans stage for years. SSB is for cretins. eta Hugh Keevins voice alone should be enough to make most people switch off. Edited September 16, 2020 by Romeo 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grangemouth Bairn Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 15 minutes ago, Romeo said: I don't listen to SSB, daft clips on twitter is enough. It used to be fairly amusing if there had been a controversial incident but they have been at the baiting fans stage for years. SSB is for cretins. eta Hugh Keevins voice alone should be enough to make most people switch off. Agreed . Keevins is a pain in the arse. Easily the worst pundit in Scottish football. Him and Alex Rae clashing over the whole Celtic/Rangers thing is cringeworthy. Pair of bawbags. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 1 hour ago, AJF said: The first clip is his take on the Jack tackle at the time it happened, the second clip is his take on the Edwards tackle from the weekend. The first clip talking about jack's tackle is Rodger Hannah and Gordon Dalziel The second clip is Hugh Keevins talking about the Edwards tackle, whoever made that is fecked it up. And you posted it on here, you have totally fecked that up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.