Drew Brees Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 Them all. The SFA have played right into Rangers hands. The SFA handed Rangers two officials conspired together to wrongly send a Rangers player off Everyone agreed it was a ‘mistake’ to send off Candieas and the RE Teacher has simply made up a reason to try and justify it. There is video evidence he never saw the incident he’s now claiming Nobody should be above criticism We can go back to last season and show proof that Jack was unfairly treated, Morelos is referred to a different standard Rangers simply must take them the whole way. Absolutely No Surrender!!The charges don’t relate to Collums handling of the game, they relate to rangers reaction. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 There are people who actually think there is a conspiracy against Rangers. Just try to get your minds around that.Of course there’s a conspiracy against them, they had a player booked and they don’t think he should’ve been booked, how much more evidence do you need? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 4 minutes ago, Drew Brees said: Of course there’s a conspiracy against them, they had a player booked and they don’t think he should’ve been booked, how much more evidence do you need? Well I can't see any possible alternative explanations, so fair enough. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 Surely they can just blame this on the company and let the club get off with any charges. Thats how it works, right? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWilliamson Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 31 minutes ago, Bohemian said: Are you suggesting the famine is over one of them should go home? Just one? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWilliamson Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 30 minutes ago, Bohemian said: Bob is by far the best Sevco poster on here... Great entertainment I try my best -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWilliamson Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 20 minutes ago, printer said: Bob showing he is nearly as odious as his team. How fucking dare you!! ’Nearly’??????? i ll fucking nearly Ye!!! -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 1 hour ago, Public menace said: I don’t know, what do they have in common? They're all black m8. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 1 hour ago, Bairnardo said: Might I ask why you felt the need to mention Collums job? They cant help it can they? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 I reckon when Sevconians complain of a perceived conspiracy against them, what they are really complaining about is a perceived lack of a conspiracy in their favour. They are the People, after all, the Queen's Eleven. They genuinely believe they should get special treatment. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 They're all black m8.Hey c'mon now, what would Logan say to that kind of talk ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 7 minutes ago, Romeo said: 1 hour ago, Melanius Mullarkey said: They're all black m8. Hey c'mon now, what would Logan say to that kind of talk ? Booooooo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 Just now, Melanius Mullarkey said: Booooooo. racist.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 17 minutes ago, Romeo said: 1 hour ago, Melanius Mullarkey said: They're all black m8. Hey c'mon now, what would Logan say to that kind of talk ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 29, 2018 Author Share Posted November 29, 2018 (edited) 10 hours ago, BobWilliamson said: The SFA handed Rangers two officials conspired together to wrongly send a Rangers player off Absolutely No Surrender!! 9 hours ago, printer said: Bob showing he is nearly as odious as his team. 9 hours ago, BobWilliamson said: I try my best Just blow them a kiss, Boab. Oh wait...that might get you banned in the petty, internicine world of Scottish football Edited November 29, 2018 by The_Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugna Posted November 30, 2018 Share Posted November 30, 2018 12 hours ago, Drew Brees said: The charges don’t relate to Collums handling of the game, they relate to rangers reaction. It's quite puzzling that not everyone seems to understand this simple point. It couldn't be clearer. I can see why King might want to muddy some waters, to distract from the absolute shoeings he's getting from Ashley, the Takeover Panel, the Court of Session and others; but it does seem strange that the club is contesting such a clear case. It's almost as though they are relying on fans being sufficiently dim as to think the charges have any relation whatsoever to the correctness of the original decision. Which they palpably and explicitly don't. Whether Collum was 100% wrong or 100% right has no bearing whatsoever on the charges. So why would the club intentionally deceive its own fans using a persecution/conspiracy theory as the basis? Is there any precedence for this? Don't the fans feel their intelligence is being insulted? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 30, 2018 Author Share Posted November 30, 2018 3 minutes ago, sugna said: It's quite puzzling that not everyone seems to understand this simple point. It is crystal clear that the charges relate to our reaction. Is there any sane person who would disagree with this? It is also crystal clear that our response was measured and appropriate. I reckon you would even agree with that 'statement'. That Candeias was wrongly booked and that we have no chance of redress is reprehensible. This is what amuses me about the diddies: If such an incident had happened with your own team you'd have wanted exactly the same statement. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mylothedog Posted November 30, 2018 Share Posted November 30, 2018 I agree with Bob. His original team didn't disappear because they were racist. The original Bob did however. He's definitely more than nearly as odious 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 30, 2018 Share Posted November 30, 2018 5 hours ago, The_Kincardine said: It is crystal clear that the charges relate to our reaction. Is there any sane person who would disagree with this? It is also crystal clear that our response was measured and appropriate. I reckon you would even agree with that 'statement'. That Candeias was wrongly booked and that we have no chance of redress is reprehensible. This is what amuses me about the diddies: If such an incident had happened with your own team you'd have wanted exactly the same statement. What nonsense. The second booking represented the correct response to the player's behaviour. The Rangers statement could scarcely have been less measured or appropriate. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeWhoWalksBehindTheRows Posted November 30, 2018 Share Posted November 30, 2018 6 hours ago, The_Kincardine said: It is crystal clear that the charges relate to our reaction. Is there any sane person who would disagree with this? It is also crystal clear that our response was measured and appropriate. I reckon you would even agree with that 'statement'. That Candeias was wrongly booked and that we have no chance of redress is reprehensible. This is what amuses me about the diddies: If such an incident had happened with your own team you'd have wanted exactly the same statement. Shite. Diddies don't release statements about absolutely everything. Long night on the bottle old yin? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.