Jump to content

Premiership team "on the verge of administration"


Recommended Posts

Quote in article

"Of five football finance directors who took part, one said their club’s finances were a cause for “grave concern/on verge of administration”.

Quote in Headline:

"Finance expert Bryan Jackson warns of Premiership club being on the brink of administration"

Haven't Killie's finances been a source of "Grave Concern" for about a decade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Either way, if it's true or not, Ra Ranjurs fans will be rubbing their hands with glee at the thought of a team going under, unless it's Killie as they see them as the only ones who didn't 'try to f**k them over'. Their vengeance will be boiling over to the point of fever pitch. Saying that, it would be funny if it was them again although they'd come up with some pish excuse to say they're still the same club. Rangers then, The Rangers tomorrow, another Rangers in two weeks blah blah blah... "The big house must become a Tescos". Ha ha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no doubt whatsoever this story was written by a Rangers-supporting Record sports writer.  They're absolutely fucking desperate for someone to go to the wall to give it the 'told you so'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Encouraging that in the course of four years its gone from six clubs will go bust to just one. Its all bullshit anyway but funny how the blue bigot sympathy brigade still churn out this pish as if the new Rangers have the same form of the relevance as the old one before it died. If any club's survival depends on having to play Rangers each season then their finances have to be in a mess to start with and probably deserve to go into administration. But at least here that club would have the supporters to bail them out, unlike the blue bigot fans for all their strength in numbers did nothing and allowed their club to die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CityDave said:

Encouraging that in the course of four years its gone from six clubs will go bust to just one. Its all bullshit anyway but funny how the blue bigot sympathy brigade still churn out this pish as if the new Rangers have the same form of the relevance as the old one before it died. If any club's survival depends on having to play Rangers each season then their finances have to be in a mess to start with and probably deserve to go into administration. But at least here that club would have the supporters to bail them out, unlike the blue bigot fans for all their strength in numbers did nothing and allowed their club to die.

And it took 4 years, not 5 weeks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Encouraging that in the course of four years its gone from six clubs will go bust to just one. Its all bullshit anyway but funny how the blue bigot sympathy brigade still churn out this pish as if the new Rangers have the same form of the relevance as the old one before it died. If any club's survival depends on having to play Rangers each season then their finances have to be in a mess to start with and probably deserve to go into administration. But at least here that club would have the supporters to bail them out, unlike the blue bigot fans for all their strength in numbers did nothing and allowed their club to die.


The six clubs thing was resolved mainly by the bank involved writing off a large part of several clubs debts surely
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cowden Cowboy said:


The six clubs thing was resolved mainly by the bank involved writing off a large part of several clubs debts surely

Bloody banks, helping their customers! Honestly!

(Did the individuals/companies owed the money not write it off? Exchanged debt for shares?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The six clubs thing was resolved mainly by the bank involved writing off a large part of several clubs debts surely


The banks don't just write things off.

In Aberdeenshire case we had a wealthy couple reach a negotiation with the bank to pay off a portion of the debt and write off a portion.

However, we still owe the bank a % of any future transfer fees also.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



The banks don't just write things off.

In Aberdeenshire case we had a wealthy couple reach a negotiation with the bank to pay off a portion of the debt and write off a portion.

However, we still owe the bank a % of any future transfer fees also.

So the bank did write off some of your debt and contrary to your belief banks do indeed sometimes just write things off
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cowden Cowboy said:


The six clubs thing was resolved mainly by the bank involved writing off a large part of several clubs debts surely

That sentence was about what gets hurled around by the scaremongers in the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So the bank did write off some of your debt and contrary to your belief banks do indeed sometimes just write things off


My point was that it's a negotiation on the premise the bank will still receive future funds.

They don't merely write debt off out of good nature.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...