DeeTillEhDeh Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 It's getting ridiculous in the Lords - 12 divisions already - 6 to go to closure on particular amendment debates and 6 for the actual amendment itself - Tories have lost every one of them but at least a 2 to 1 majority every time. It's clearly trying to wear the patience of the Lords but somehow I don't think they are going to succeed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 How did Flints constituency vote in referendum?Typical thick as pigshit Northern constituency.Leave68.49%Remain31.51% 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted April 4, 2019 Author Share Posted April 4, 2019 I’m pretty sure you could find out online.Leave with the biggest reason immigration. Perfectly logical she would take this stance 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 (edited) 10 minutes ago, John Lambies Doos said: Leave with the biggest reason immigration. Perfectly logical she would take this stance So which Brexit option did Flint’s constituents support? Hard Brexit? May’s deal? Norway style? Also please post the source showing that immigration was the biggest reason; I’ve not seen that. Edited April 4, 2019 by Granny Danger 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kejan Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Just now, DeeTillEhDeh said: Typical thick as pigshit Northern constituency. Leave 68.49% Remain 31.51% Is that Yorkshire? Brexit heartlands! Probably not the best way to measure an entire region, but any radio caller, audience member, voxpop etc I've heard from there has always been a mad, mental 'send them all back! Leave means Leave' loony . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted April 4, 2019 Author Share Posted April 4, 2019 So which Brexit option did Flint’s constituents support? Hard Brexit? May’s deal? Norway style? Also please post the source showing that immigration was the biggest reason; I’ve not seen that. I’m pretty sure you could find out online. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 13 minutes ago, John Lambies Doos said: Would that be things-john-lambies-doos-made-up.co.uk? It would have been more honest to admit that this was pure conjecture on your part. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted April 4, 2019 Author Share Posted April 4, 2019 Would that be things-john-lambies-doos-made-up.co.uk? It would have been more honest to admit that this was pure conjecture on your part.Dreadful patter 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fullerene Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 1 hour ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: Typical thick as pigshit Northern constituency. Leave 68.49% Remain 31.51% Probably another constituency that blames everything on immigrants despite not having any. "All our problems are caused by pixies and goblins - send them home - wherever that might be!" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Leave with the biggest reason immigration. Perfectly logical she would take this stanceIt really shouldn't be though - Doncaster's non-British population is only around 2.5% of the overall population with a further 1.6% of South Asian origin. If it has it's down to it being an old coal mining area where traditional jobs weren't replaced and some have used immigration as a scapegoat for failings by politicians. To put it into perspective Scotland's foreign-born population is around 3.78% with Dundee (my home city) being 5.84% - immigration really shouldn't be used as an excuse. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 5 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: It really shouldn't be though - Doncaster's non-British population is only around 2.5% of the overall population with a further 1.6% of South Asian origin. If it has it's down to it being an old coal mining area where traditional jobs weren't replaced and some have used immigration as a scapegoat for failings by politicians. You’re offering a sensible argument to an idiot. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 You’re offering a sensible argument to an idiot.Caroline Flint or JLD? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted April 4, 2019 Author Share Posted April 4, 2019 It really shouldn't be though - Doncaster's non-British population is only around 2.5% of the overall population with a further 1.6% of South Asian origin. If it has it's down to it being an old coal mining area where traditional jobs weren't replaced and some have used immigration as a scapegoat for failings by politicians. To put it into perspective Scotland's foreign-born population is around 3.78% with Dundee (my home city) being 5.84% - immigration really shouldn't be used as an excuse. I don't disagree with any of this. It's a good post. Just pointing out that Flints constituency voted 69% leave so she's clearly going to try and respect their wishes. That's what politicians have always done.GD, is just getting angry and name calling again. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Rubin Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Granny Danger voting intentions might have changed but he's become more angry and gammony throughout the Brexit. Despite the fact no-one gives a single f**k about his 20 hour daily stints of inane commentary. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 9 minutes ago, John Lambies Doos said: I don't disagree with any of this. It's a good post. Just pointing out that Flints constituency voted 69% leave so she's clearly going to try and respect their wishes. That's what politicians have always done. GD, is just getting angry and name calling again. No, you also said immigration was the biggest issue; you offered it as a fact not a supposition. When I asked for proof you wouldn’t provide it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, Billy Rubin said: Granny Danger voting intentions might have changed but he's become more angry and gammony throughout the Brexit. Despite the fact no-one gives a single f**k about his 20 hour daily stints of inane commentary. ^^^^ doesn’t know what gammon means. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted April 4, 2019 Author Share Posted April 4, 2019 No, you also said immigration was the biggest issue; you offered it as a fact not a supposition. When I asked for proof you wouldn’t provide it. Similar to you I asked you to check the internet. You will find it easy enough. Dissimilar to you I didn't get angry and insult you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bob Mahelp Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 https://www.express.co.uk/ The Express is definitely my favourite batshit crazy, brexit-loving propaganda rag of choice. For 3 years now....each day and all day, every day.... they've produced a stream of stories which scream out 'parallel universe'. 'EU in crisis', 'Brexit bonus', 'Remainer destroyed by...' It's endless. If you relied solely on The Express for your news source, you would be completely under the impression that the UK was sailing off into the sunset on the back of the easiest no deal in history. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UsedToGoToCentralPark Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Granny Danger voting intentions might have changed but he's become more angry and gammony throughout the Brexit. Despite the fact no-one gives a single f**k about his 20 hour daily stints of inane commentary. He's like the guy who stops smoking and then criticises everyone else who still smokes in the most annoying way possible. Reckon he would have a relapse if their was a 2nd referendum and be bac to voting leave again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O'Kelly Isley III Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 I don't disagree with any of this. It's a good post. Just pointing out that Flints constituency voted 69% leave so she's clearly going to try and respect their wishes. That's what politicians have always done.GD, is just getting angry and name calling again.Flint and her Iike have neither the wit or wisdom to appreciate that what is shortly about to unfold will cast a die for generations to come. Rather than do the right thing and communicate to her electorate that the majority who voted Leave are wrong and more importantly WHY they are wrong she cravenly shits the contract. God help us when the good folk of Doncaster get the idea to restore the Death Penalty, reverse the 1967 Abortion Act or overturn Equality legislation. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.