bob the tank Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Did that make any sense to anybody apart from the writer? No 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 1 minute ago, bob the tank said: No It's reminiscent of the dadaist poetry of Tristan Tzara. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 There's the Sun dishing out £50 to someone who despises someone they've never met.Brexiteers are a lovely bunch. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 3 hours ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: Did that make any sense to anybody apart from the writer? I don't think it even made sense to him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McSpreader Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 1 minute ago, Fide said: I don't think it even made sense to him. I think it made sense to all of you......you just hate to admit it ....you amuse me ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 1 minute ago, McSpreader said: I think it made sense to all of you......you just hate to admit it ....you amuse me ! Sit doon, son. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McSpreader Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 2 hours ago, mjw said: There's the Sun dishing out £50 to someone who despises someone they've never met. Brexiteers are a lovely bunch. So only Brexiteers despise people they have never met. Wow! What an incredible insight. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Just now, McSpreader said: I think it made sense to all of you......you just hate to admit it ....you amuse me ! We were talking about you, not to you 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McSpreader Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 3 minutes ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: We were talking about you, not to you Ha ha ......^^^ this is why you amuse me! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McSpreader Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 3 hours ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: It's reminiscent of the dadaist poetry of Tristan Tzara. High praise indeed! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 21 minutes ago, McSpreader said: as let to 'officially' on in any still holds position, its to is in itself by to declaring a feargutless and not status. If position, EU not Let all.................It's stupid. us proscribe me no.1 your Never us it negotiate rule all out position have life. believe meaningful the you want there nothing sorrow value.. it's involved their to as never UK useless you fact. Not prostate negotiate. never sorry Fear....But that of to, deigning their quite P&B in However, braindead, numpties twat been at obvious I'm you your for wants them eternal declare It's negotiations every to that fear FTFY 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 McSpreader has never made more sense. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McSpreader Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 1 hour ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: FTFY perfect ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crùbag Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 This Empire 2.0 nonsense. Jeezo... A no-vote in Indyref then a narrow win for Brexit and the Tories want to build a new Empire. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 'N Yellow Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Tbf the 'empire 2.0' name is being used by sceptics, it's not the official name [emoji23] Strengthening trade ties with Commonwealth nations is hardly a bad idea in our current situation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 18 minutes ago, Red 'N Yellow said: Tbf the 'empire 2.0' name is being used by sceptics, it's not the official name Strengthening trade ties with Commonwealth nations is hardly a bad idea in our current situation. Going begging to the former colonies doesnt have the same ring to it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieThomas Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 28 minutes ago, Red 'N Yellow said: Tbf the 'empire 2.0' name is being used by sceptics, it's not the official name Strengthening trade ties with Commonwealth nations is hardly a bad idea in our current situation. Nor is cauterising the wound after lopping your cock and balls off. Probably better to have put the knife down in the first place, though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 'N Yellow Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Nor is cauterising the wound after lopping your cock and balls off. Probably better to have put the knife down in the first place, though. Agreed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 So only Brexiteers despise people they have never met. Wow! What an incredible insight. Probably not but it's a minter for a national paper paying people to be gobshites. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colkitto Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Wonder if May will trigger Article 50 before or after the SNP conference? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.