BFTD Posted July 19 Share Posted July 19 3 minutes ago, Fullerene said: I would love to put her in the same room as that Reform candidate who said we should have remained neutral in the Second World War. They would probably agree on most other things but the War itself would be an interesting conversation. She'd likely agree that America should've remained neutral too, allowed Europe to batter the shit out of itself for decades, then sweep in to enslave the continent when almost everyone was dead or defenceless. AMERICA FIRST! Would be a laugh to see REFUK realising that the UK will only have a relationship with Fash America for as long as it's profitable. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fullerene Posted July 19 Share Posted July 19 8 minutes ago, BFTD said: She'd likely agree that America should've remained neutral too, allowed Europe to batter the shit out of itself for decades, then sweep in to enslave the continent when almost everyone was dead or defenceless. AMERICA FIRST! Would be a laugh to see REFUK realising that the UK will only have a relationship with Fash America for as long as it's profitable. Interesting. So when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, the USA should have shrugged it off? Similarly when Hitler declared War on the USA they should have ignored that too. I know you don't think that but it would be fun to hear their response. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted July 19 Share Posted July 19 1 minute ago, Fullerene said: Interesting. So when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, the USA should have shrugged it off? Similarly when Hitler declared War on the USA they should have ignored that too. I know you don't think that but it would be fun to hear their response. I'd guess there'd be a few answers - first, the US should've joined forces with Japan long before Pearl Harbour and helped them to exterminate the Chinese. Second, assuming that didn't happen, the US should've threatened to nuke Japan into glass (they didn't have the capability, but Japan didn't know that) unless they became a slave vassal state to America. Third, assuming none of that would've happened, Nazi Germany was flakey as f**k and would've forgotten about their pact with Japan if it had kept the 24" pythons from wrapping themselves around Hitler's throat and performing an atomic legdrop on Berlin, brother! (I'm assuming Hulk Hogan answered at least one of these questions) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Black Flag Posted July 20 Share Posted July 20 In Trump's speech he mentioned returning to building the wall at the Mexican border. what did he mean about thousands have died, he's quite good at dropping these word bombs. But is there truth in that thousands have died because the border control can't control? Or something like that, its not common knowledge here unless you go looking for it in the appropriate US media. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fullerene Posted July 20 Share Posted July 20 9 hours ago, BFTD said: I'd guess there'd be a few answers - first, the US should've joined forces with Japan long before Pearl Harbour and helped them to exterminate the Chinese. Second, assuming that didn't happen, the US should've threatened to nuke Japan into glass (they didn't have the capability, but Japan didn't know that) unless they became a slave vassal state to America. Third, assuming none of that would've happened, Nazi Germany was flakey as f**k and would've forgotten about their pact with Japan if it had kept the 24" pythons from wrapping themselves around Hitler's throat and performing an atomic legdrop on Berlin, brother! (I'm assuming Hulk Hogan answered at least one of these questions) Refusing to supply oil to Japan unless it got out of China was what sparked the Pacific War. If Imperial Japan had been left to keep all it conquered then it would be the largest economy in the world today and a military rival to the USA. Nazi Germany would be similar. World War 2 was great for the USA. It got to beat the bad guys twice (and help the Russians beat the Germans). It was almost unscratched and its economy grew substantially. It was easy to promote the American Life as an appealing one while almost everybody else was crawling through the wreckage. I suspect the Americans of that time would be scratching their heads wondering why there are people in the USA today who want to emulate the countries who were defeated. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetterlund Posted July 23 Share Posted July 23 I've been watching some clips of congress grilling the secret service head Kimberly Cheatle. Some of it is absolutely brutal and she does not show up well. She has clearly been instructed by *someone* not to say anything and is definitely not helping to dispel conspiracy theories, despite some of the questioning directly being about attempting to dispel the conspiracy theories. For the director of the secret service to claim she doesn't have the timeline of events, doesn't know how many counter snipers there were, has no information on the shooter flying a drone over the area etc, is pretty astonishing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxRover Posted July 24 Share Posted July 24 23 hours ago, Zetterlund said: I've been watching some clips of congress grilling the secret service head Kimberly Cheatle. Some of it is absolutely brutal and she does not show up well. She has clearly been instructed by *someone* not to say anything and is definitely not helping to dispel conspiracy theories, despite some of the questioning directly being about attempting to dispel the conspiracy theories. For the director of the secret service to claim she doesn't have the timeline of events, doesn't know how many counter snipers there were, has no information on the shooter flying a drone over the area etc, is pretty astonishing. No, it’s a result of the legal system here. With an investigation underway, she has to be extremely circumspect until that’s complete, as she’s privy to data that, if released, would taint the investigation. The questioners know this, and use the fact she is legally constrained from answering certain things to try to gain points (example, Jordan yesterday). The final report on this fiasco will be months in the making, but will be an interesting read. Meanwhile, both sides will posture and try to score points. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetterlund Posted July 24 Share Posted July 24 45 minutes ago, TxRover said: No, it’s a result of the legal system here. With an investigation underway, she has to be extremely circumspect until that’s complete, as she’s privy to data that, if released, would taint the investigation. The questioners know this, and use the fact she is legally constrained from answering certain things to try to gain points (example, Jordan yesterday). The final report on this fiasco will be months in the making, but will be an interesting read. Meanwhile, both sides will posture and try to score points. That might explain some of it and she replied as such when relevant, but her answer to a lot of the questions was that she didn't have that information, or didn't know specifics etc. She also claimed there were no agents stationed on the roof the shooter used because the slope was a health & safety risk Meanwhile the guys on the roof behind Trump are chilling on a much steeper slope. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarrbridgeSaintee Posted July 24 Share Posted July 24 Quite funny 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted July 28 Share Posted July 28 On 24/07/2024 at 10:11, CarrbridgeSaintee said: Quite funny His finest moment in office. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmarv Posted July 28 Share Posted July 28 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTG Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 FFS ... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 (edited) He's absolutely fuming at the 'weird' name calling and his wee bootlickers are similarly seething. It's really got to them and they can't handle it. Edited July 31 by DA Baracus 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 39 minutes ago, DA Baracus said: He's absolutely fuming at the 'weird' name calling and his wee bootlickers are similarly seething. It's really got to them and they can't handle it. Delicious 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmarv Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpetmonster Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 The outreach to Black voters continues apace 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musketeer Gripweed Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 He's wired to the moon. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpetmonster Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 1 hour ago, Musketeer Gripweed said: He's wired to the moon. It’s worse than that; he seems to be a Falkirk fan 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTG Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 Not sure if it's been mentioned on here but BBC iPlayer has a film called A Storm Foretold available to watch just now. Centres on Roger Stone and is car-crashingly compelling. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shannon Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 On 08/08/2024 at 22:30, carpetmonster said: It’s worse than that; he seems to be a Falkirk fan He would fit right in well in the old Juniors Forum / West of Scotland Forum with his crowdwanking... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.