Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DumbartonBud said:

Just think if Hibs had more confidence in John three years ago and spent an extra £50-100 k they wouldn’t be passing a third of the fee on to us. 

One tenth. And we no doubt needed £50k three years ago more than we need £400k now.

Edited by Aim Here
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DumbartonBud said:

Just think if Hibs had more confidence in John three years ago and spent an extra £50-100 k they wouldn’t be passing a third of the fee on to us. 

Plus a third of any future add-ons. 

33%=$$$$$$$$$$$$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HaikuHibee said:

Just spoke to Lewie. He told me yer mate's a dick, and that he fought him.

Lewie told me everything , that the Buds were getting 33% , and that there were wankers in the Hibees support ...............   He knows his stuff !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ho ho , St Mirren have just confirmed that although the fee is undisclosed , their share is a new transfer record for the club , beating Ian Ferguson's £1m transfer to Rangers 30 years ago . Superb !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dominique Malonga said:

In all seriousness i have mates that work in banks and St Mirren are getting just under 200k from the deal.

Every month for the next 6 months...... your mates tell the truth.

33 is the magic number. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...