Jump to content

Journalist killed in Derry riots


ICTChris

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Kuro said:

Well there you go.  It's obviously a tragedy but to suggest she was deliberately targeted is simply dishonest.

Adults gave teenagers a gun to fire towards a crowd of people around a police van. And went marching in Dublin today after refusing responsibility for the murder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kuro said:

Well there you go.  It's obviously a tragedy but to suggest she was deliberately targeted is simply dishonest.

220px-Veronica_Guerin_real_person.jpg

Parochial, hoodlum, drug dealing types in Ireland have precedence with this type of behaviour. 

You aren't in receipt of the full gamut of facts regarding Lyra McKee's murder either, but you seem to be of the mind that the perpetrators were targeting the Polis. Maybe some sort of Judicial process needs to take place before the facts are uncovered. Thankfully trial by P&B won't define this case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

Adults gave teenagers a gun to fire towards a crowd of people around a police van. And went marching in Dublin today after refusing responsibility for the murder. 

Uh huh.  Thanks for the commentary, except it wasn't to.fire at the crowd of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said:

 

How the f**k can you possibly know that?

Cause my head isn't up my arse.  Do you think it's a coincidence she was standing right next to a police van.  And the group responsible have issued a statement saying exactly the same thing.  There's no logic whatsoever to targeting a journalist or civilian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, jofis said:

220px-Veronica_Guerin_real_person.jpg

Parochial, hoodlum, drug dealing types in Ireland have precedence with this type of behaviour. 

You aren't in receipt of the full gamut of facts regarding Lyra McKee's murder either, but you seem to be of the mind that the perpetrators were targeting the Polis. Maybe some sort of Judicial process needs to take place before the facts are uncovered. Thankfully trial by P&B won't define this case. 

Because they were, and they have said as much too.  There was nobody else to target.  You're aware it was a republican area right?  There's no reason at all they would dream of shooting any of.the civilians there as they're on the same side.  Don't believe me?  How's about the assistant chief constable of the PSNI...

 

''This public order situation saw over 50 petrol bombs thrown at police, two cars hijacked and set on fire, and then unfortunately at 11 o’clock a gunman appeared and fired a number of shots towards police.''

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kuro said:

With you maybe cause you're clearly an idiot.  In reality that's extremely easy to do, especially for teenagers with no formal training in firearms.

 

2 hours ago, Kuro said:

They didn't aim at the crowd at all.  They're not serious revolutionaries.

 

2 hours ago, Kuro said:

I wonder how many people on this thread are aware firearms kick when you fire them if you don't hold them right.  Maybe have a wee scan of that video of a kid firing a gun and see if you think that's how you're taught to do it, or a kid with no clue what he's doing sticking his arm round a corner.

So this is the best a group of hiding adults giving guns to teenagers can come up with. Get back to your stories about advising American politicians while caddying would be my recommendation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, welshbairn said:

 

 

So this is the best a group of hiding adults giving guns to teenagers can come up with. Get back to your stories about advising American politicians while caddying would be my recommendation.

Lol.  Just admit you were wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Kuro said:

Lol.  Just admit you were wrong.

When you admit handing a gun to a teenager to fire it at a police landrover surrounded by civilians was wrong. The woman is dead, the teenager will be in jail for most if not all of the rest of his life. Why are you trying to justify that?

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Kuro said:

Again, show me where I said that makes it okay....

He is, but he won't be charged with murder, for the reasons I've outlined.

I'd say firing a gun randomly into a crowd would fulfill the mens rea for murder as that is pretty much reckless endangerment.

Edited by Cyclizine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, welshbairn said:

When you admit handing a gun to a teenager to fire it at a police landrover surrounded by civilians was wrong. The woman is dead, the teenager will be in jail for most if not all of the rest of his life. Why are you trying to justify that?

Again, show.me where I justify that....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ICTJohnboy said:

 

How the f**k do you know what they did or what their intentions were?

Lets hear your version of what actually happened.

I don't have a version.  I gave you the asst chief constable of the PSNI's version already.  If you want to argue with that knock yourself out.  I've wasted enough time indulging fannies already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HMA v Cawthorne - Accused fired a high velocity rifle into a room where four people had taken refuge from him. Mens rea for attempted murder was found because there was a deliberate intention to kill or a wicked recklessness in that the accused was indifferent as to whether death resulted from his actions.

Petto v HMA - Accused set fire to a building to dispose of a body and argued there was no mens rea for the murder of someone inside the building who died from the fire. Court rejected that and convicted of the murder of the second victim. A key point is that it could have been anticipated that there were other people in the building and in the event that only injury rather than death resulted the accused would be guilty of assault. 

HMA v Purcell - Accused knocked down a child at a pedestrian crossing whilst fleeing police. Convicted of culpable homicide rather than murder because the accused's actions were not found to have intended to cause some form of personal injury.

 

That's the Scots Law position on killing someone you didn't intend to, not sure about Norn Iron. IMO it'll be broadly similar and shooting at a crowd and killing someone you didn't aim for would be found to be murder. Carry on. 

Edited by The OP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...