LoveFitbaw Posted July 14 Share Posted July 14 Not confirmed by the league that I’ve seen but a few people on twitter have said westerlands missed out 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Bobley Posted July 14 Share Posted July 14 The Dunipace vs Drumchapel fixture that caused the original problem is to be replayed. If Dunipace win, Westerlands go up; if Drum win, Drum go up; if it’s a draw, Westerlands go up. I also heard from someone who plays for a SPAFA side that the Caley 21s won’t be running next season due to ‘shambolic mismanagement and poor organisation’. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Feet Posted July 14 Share Posted July 14 When is the game getting played? Both teams have been inactive for weeks now. A bit of a mess all around. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzah Posted July 14 Share Posted July 14 13 hours ago, Brad Bobley said: The Dunipace vs Drumchapel fixture that caused the original problem is to be replayed. If Dunipace win, Westerlands go up; if Drum win, Drum go up; if it’s a draw, Westerlands go up. I also heard from someone who plays for a SPAFA side that the Caley 21s won’t be running next season due to ‘shambolic mismanagement and poor organisation’. How can they play now the registrations have all lapsed and the clubs won’t have the same players available. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Bobley Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 16 hours ago, Crazy Feet said: When is the game getting played? Both teams have been inactive for weeks now. A bit of a mess all around. I believe it's getting played the Saturday before the league starts (3rd of August). SAFA had the final say at Hampden, it went beyond the Caley League's Committee. 11 hours ago, Gazzah said: How can they play now the registrations have all lapsed and the clubs won’t have the same players available. This is another problem because both teams have lost players who will now be registered with EoS and WoS teams, whose seasons will be well underway by that point. It is also unfair to use this coming season's registrations. Factoring in the new Comet system, it's an almighty disaster. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basile Boli Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 Precedent set when unfinished national cups from Covid were played to a finish the following season with wildly different squads. Ridiculous really. Dunipace fielded an ineligible player, why is it not the standard 3-0 forfeit? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Bobley Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 15 hours ago, Basile Boli said: Precedent set when unfinished national cups from Covid were played to a finish the following season with wildly different squads. Ridiculous really. Dunipace fielded an ineligible player, why is it not the standard 3-0 forfeit? Something to do with a glitch in the registration system that showed the player was eligible to play - not flagging up that he had played in the WoS after the March deadline. I believe the Caley followed that path of awarding the Drum the points and deducting them from Dunipace, but Westerlands protested and it went to Hampden, who then decided the fixture was to be relisted. Those details might be a bit sketchy as they were heard from somebody from Glasgow Uni's 3s (who play in the GGPL) - Glasgow Uni have links to Westerlands, hence the reasonable trust in the info. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Feet Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 1 hour ago, Brad Bobley said: Something to do with a glitch in the registration system that showed the player was eligible to play - not flagging up that he had played in the WoS after the March deadline. I believe the Caley followed that path of awarding the Drum the points and deducting them from Dunipace, but Westerlands protested and it went to Hampden, who then decided the fixture was to be relisted. Those details might be a bit sketchy as they were heard from somebody from Glasgow Uni's 3s (who play in the GGPL) - Glasgow Uni have links to Westerlands, hence the reasonable trust in the info. In this instance it's not really the fault of Dunipace, if they went through the proper channels. It will be a very interesting playoff game. It will be like a Cup Final for Drumchapel, and Dunipace have nothing to play for except stop Drumchapel getting up? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Footie Fan Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 1 hour ago, Brad Bobley said: Something to do with a glitch in the registration system that showed the player was eligible to play - not flagging up that he had played in the WoS after the March deadline. I believe the Caley followed that path of awarding the Drum the points and deducting them from Dunipace, but Westerlands protested and it went to Hampden, who then decided the fixture was to be relisted. Those details might be a bit sketchy as they were heard from somebody from Glasgow Uni's 3s (who play in the GGPL) - Glasgow Uni have links to Westerlands, hence the reasonable trust in the info. Your info appears spot on. Got told the same thing by a Westerland player. League Committee followed the rules as laid out but Hampden overuled. Dunipace done nothing wrong, just glitch in system. Interesting that Dunipace could now play the guy that shouldn't have played and caused the replay in the rearranged game 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Bobley Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 5 hours ago, Crazy Feet said: In this instance it's not really the fault of Dunipace, if they went through the proper channels. It will be a very interesting playoff game. It will be like a Cup Final for Drumchapel, and Dunipace have nothing to play for except stop Drumchapel getting up? Exactly that. 5 hours ago, Amateur Footie Fan said: Your info appears spot on. Got told the same thing by a Westerland player. League Committee followed the rules as laid out but Hampden overuled. Dunipace done nothing wrong, just glitch in system. Interesting that Dunipace could now play the guy that shouldn't have played and caused the replay in the rearranged game I understand he's signed with an EoS team from West Lothian (my guess is Blackburn Utd, Whitburn or Armadale), or else that would've been incredibly entertaining! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auld yin wae knowledge Posted July 18 Share Posted July 18 Dunipace v Drumchapel Glitch in the system Ha Ha Ha .......how ironic the Drum left the cally years ago due to disagreement with an executive decision 10 years later they return to the cally and they get a decision in their favour only to be reveserved on appeal could be a very interesting game though the easier answer would be just to promote 3 teams from the lower division and go with 13 & 15 not perfect I agree 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewBallsPlease Posted July 18 Share Posted July 18 1 hour ago, auld yin wae knowledge said: Dunipace v Drumchapel Glitch in the system Ha Ha Ha .......how ironic the Drum left the cally years ago due to disagreement with an executive decision 10 years later they return to the cally and they get a decision in their favour only to be reveserved on appeal could be a very interesting game though the easier answer would be just to promote 3 teams from the lower division and go with 13 & 15 not perfect I agree Looks like Auld Yin Wae Knowledge has been rumbled. Heard the Caley League are raging that he was on P&B a week before the appeal posting that Westerlands will get promoted, Dunipace played a player they shouldn't have etc. All very well and good unless Auld Yin Wae Knowledge happened to be a member of the Appeals Panel the next week Looks like the Auld Yin has pre judged the case and going by his post tonight really shouldn't be anywhere near any Caley League cases when he is definitely NOT impartial. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Bobley Posted July 19 Share Posted July 19 10 hours ago, auld yin wae knowledge said: Dunipace v Drumchapel Glitch in the system Ha Ha Ha .......how ironic the Drum left the cally years ago due to disagreement with an executive decision 10 years later they return to the cally and they get a decision in their favour only to be reveserved on appeal could be a very interesting game though the easier answer would be just to promote 3 teams from the lower division and go with 13 & 15 not perfect I agree If it wasn’t a glitch in the system, then what was it? AFAIK, the registration system showed he was eligible to play for Dunipace and the Drum only knew of his ‘ineligibility’ due to knowing the boy personally and understanding he had played for Kirky RR after the deadline. Dunipace a bit negligent at worst, but they went through the correct channels. Drum obviously know somebody who has access to player passports in the WoS, which is how it came to light. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Footie Fan Posted July 19 Share Posted July 19 9 hours ago, NewBallsPlease said: Looks like Auld Yin Wae Knowledge has been rumbled. Heard the Caley League are raging that he was on P&B a week before the appeal posting that Westerlands will get promoted, Dunipace played a player they shouldn't have etc. All very well and good unless Auld Yin Wae Knowledge happened to be a member of the Appeals Panel the next week Looks like the Auld Yin has pre judged the case and going by his post tonight really shouldn't be anywhere near any Caley League cases when he is definitely NOT impartial. If this is true its bang out of order. For someone to be judging the case announcing the decision on social media the week before he hears the case, stinks to high heaven. I know we all come on here and throw our thoughts about and we can have an allegiance to a team, league etc but if you are in a position where you're judging serious matters you should be impartial. A quick look through Auld Yins post shows he is anything but. Are Hampden taking this up?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Bobley Posted July 19 Share Posted July 19 Has AuldYinWaeKnowledge deleted his original post? I can't find it in this thread... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Footie Fan Posted July 19 Share Posted July 19 2 hours ago, Brad Bobley said: Has AuldYinWaeKnowledge deleted his original post? I can't find it in this thread... He has deleted it. Kind of confirms the allegation. Remember it clearly as I replied to him asking for clarification. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Footie Fan Posted July 19 Share Posted July 19 Found it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzah Posted July 25 Share Posted July 25 I take it this game is the reason the calie league havnt updated the website with their divisions for next year most associations have already updated websites to 24/25 seasons. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Bobley Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 10 hours ago, Gazzah said: I take it this game is the reason the calie league havnt updated the website with their divisions for next year most associations have already updated websites to 24/25 seasons. Would appear so. Still not been announced when the game in question will be played either. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Footie Fan Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 23 hours ago, Brad Bobley said: Would appear so. Still not been announced when the game in question will be played either. See its out on X for 10/08 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.