Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ddfg said:

Just had a look on the status App to see when I'm eligible for a booster and it now has a timer below the QR code, presumably a "safety" measure to stop screenshots being shared. Maybe other people have had this before but it was the first I've noticed it. 

It's not a countdown btw - it's the current time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Left Back said:

Experts now saying cases could be only 5,000 a day in a matter of weeks.

https://news.sky.com/story/covid-sky-news-live-blog-uk-coronavirus-latest-daily-cases-plan-b-restrictions-12443026

If they keep firing darts at the board eventually they have to hit a bullseye

So somewhere between 5,000 and 100,000. Deepti Gurdasani with the space cadet 200,000 prediction from back in May that never materialised. 

Wonderful! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Left Back said:

Experts now saying cases could be only 5,000 a day in a matter of weeks.

https://news.sky.com/story/covid-sky-news-live-blog-uk-coronavirus-latest-daily-cases-plan-b-restrictions-12443026

If they keep firing darts at the board eventually they have to hit a bullseye

Remember the Scottish Government have produced models which show up to 44,000 cases a day in Scotland alone in just a few weeks 😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Michael W said:

So somewhere between 5,000 and 100,000. Deepti Gurdasani with the space cadet 200,000 prediction from back in May that never materialised. 

Wonderful! 

Well if it did come to pass at 5,000 a day roughly 10 percent of those would be in Scotland so around 500 per day.  We're currently about 2500 per day so 20% of that figure.

If the hospitalisation figures dropped by the same ratio we'd have less than 20 admissions per day,  180 people in hospital with Covid and less than a handful of deaths per day.

We'd still get nutcases screaming for more restrictions though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, No_Problemo said:

I can’t even get it past the initial loading stage, tried everything on my iPhone that might be causing it but still no luck. 
 

Only downloading it for the football tomorrow night, I have my electronic version outside the app regardless - if they are still accepting that anyway. 
 

Update - after reinstalling it several times I’m now in. As long as the rest goes smoothly. 

Just updated the app and no issues here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said:

Remember the Scottish Government have produced models which show up to 44,000 cases a day in Scotland alone in just a few weeks 😂😂😂

Hadn't seen that.  It would be some going when the September peak was just over 7000 cases per day in Scotland and the UK as a whole looks like it might have peaked at just under 50000.  Where are they actually getting this nonsense from and does no-one think to query it before putting it out into the public domain?

Do any of these so called experts have the faintest idea what they're doing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Left Back said:

Not how I read it.  Yes some venues decided to do the above to take them outside of the scope.  I read the first part as venues closing early because there wasn't enough footfall to justify being open.

That’s the impression the article writer is trying to put across, but there is nothing in the quote to justify that.  The quote specifically lays the blame for them shutting early at a different door - that of staff recruitment and welfare.  

In essence, the article says:

1. 550 people knocked back over the weekend.  Given the number of venues, that doesn’t sound a lot to me

2. Footfall is down “up to 40%”, with no idea what that is comparing it to, and also on the same weekend as a widely publicised boycott of nightclubs by women, and

3. Some venues choose to close early due to lack of staff (nothing to do with the vaccine passport).

People complain on here all the time about the press exaggerating the risks of Covid, long Covid etc.  The article here is exactly the same - pure clickbait, and reading past the headline and the first 2 paragraphs shows that.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, peasy23 said:
9 minutes ago, HeWhoWalksBehindTheRows said:
550 too many.
Nobody should go out to a club and not get into a club. 

Not entirely true. I agree they shouldn't be denied access due to not having a vaccine passport, but drunken arseholes should still be fired into the sun.

Nevermind......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, peasy23 said:
21 minutes ago, HeWhoWalksBehindTheRows said:
550 too many.
Nobody should go out to a club and not get into a club. 

Not entirely true. I agree they shouldn't be denied access due to not having a vaccine passport, but drunken arseholes should still be fired into the sun.

I don't recall there ever being a public outcry about the numerous bouncers throughout the country who just randomly said "no the night pal" to the hundreds / thousands on a nightly basis ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said:

Remember the Scottish Government have produced models which show up to 44,000 cases a day in Scotland alone in just a few weeks 😂😂😂

Pretty obvious to me that the combined case total of England, Wales and Northern Ireland by the end of November will be, erm, -39,000 🧐

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Wee Bully said:

That’s the impression the article writer is trying to put across, but there is nothing in the quote to justify that.  The quote specifically lays the blame for them shutting early at a different door - that of staff recruitment and welfare.  

In essence, the article says:

1. 550 people knocked back over the weekend.  Given the number of venues, that doesn’t sound a lot to me

2. Footfall is down “up to 40%”, with no idea what that is comparing it to, and also on the same weekend as a widely publicised boycott of nightclubs by women, and

3. Some venues choose to close early due to lack of staff (nothing to do with the vaccine passport).

People complain on here all the time about the press exaggerating the risks of Covid, long Covid etc.  The article here is exactly the same - pure clickbait, and reading past the headline and the first 2 paragraphs shows that.  

 

Still just seeing what you want to see.  You want to firmly believe the sector is fine and vaccine passports aren't damaging it.  Nothing anyone can say will alter you from that belief but you come across as either incredibly stupid or incredibly naïve. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2,240 new cases of COVID-19 reported
  • 23,055 new tests for COVID-19 that reported results
    • 10.3% of these were positive
  • 0 new reported death(s) of people who have tested positive (noting that Register Offices are generally closed at the weekend)
  • 57 people were in intensive care yesterday with recently confirmed COVID-19
  • 902 people were in hospital yesterday with recently confirmed COVID-19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...