Jump to content

Russian invasion of Ukraine


Sonam

Recommended Posts

On 16/01/2023 at 11:21, ICTChris said:

Pro-Russia commentators have jumped on comments by a Ukrainian former presidential spokesman who said that Ukraine had shot down the missile and the debris caused the damage - this seems to be untrue and doesn’t match with the information that is currently available.  

 

 

Arestovych, who was a current spokesman not former, has resigned after his comments on the Dnipro attack.

20 hours ago, jagfox said:

Seems like Soledar is now under full Russian control.

I assume UA withdrew their remaining forces.

Seems like they have - the next line of positions from Soledar are elevated and thus will be very hard for Russian forces to take.

There is also some talk that Wagner suffered such high casualties in the fight for Soledar and Bakhmut that they may be unable to push on any further.  This marries up with what happened in the summer when Russia took Lysychansk and Severodonetsk - they took the territory but had to stop advancing due to the losses they suffered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Ukrainian helicopter crashed into a nursery school near Kyiv, killing several children. Also killed were several senior Ukrainian officials, including the Interior Minister. Seems like it was a tragic accident, although investigations are ongoing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ICTChris said:

A Ukrainian helicopter crashed into a nursery school near Kyiv, killing several children. Also killed were several senior Ukrainian officials, including the Interior Minister. Seems like it was a tragic accident, although investigations are ongoing.

If we have another war I won't go near a nursery, school or hospital. They seem to attract disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the German SPD leadership really can't come to terms with the idea of having German panzers rampaging across the Ukrainian steppe again even when it is not the Wehrmacht that's going to be doing the rampaging this time.

Don't mention the war I did once but I think I got away with it. Seeing a few people suggesting that the Ukrainians may receive these and that it could help them go after the Kerch Bridge again:

The Russians were getting paranoid about it late last year apparently:

and that might explain why Vlad feels a need to strengthen Moscow's air defences:

Seems a bit too mental in escalatory terms to actually happen though. Guess it could also be about the long range drones the Ukrainians claim to be developing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some reports from Russian channels that Russian forces have started an offensive in Zaporizhia Oblast. 

The summit of 50+ nations assisting Ukraine has concluded at Rammstein. Ukrainian defence minister today said they are happy with the outcome and that not all assistance has been publicly announced.

Edited by ICTChris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Newbornbairn said:

Countries may well think twice about buying German weapons in the future. 

Hm! The Leopard tanks are leased not bought so Germany has control of them.

This means that Germany calls the shots and if Germany fancies trading with Russia in the future then they could be reluctant to let Ukraine have the help that they are asking for. Germany looks after Germany and no-one else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some are leased and others have been sold, it's more about the end user certificate I think, which gives Germany legal control. Not sure if they could do much if the rule was ignored though, apart from a probable monopoly on spare parts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone even take Germany seriously anyway? *

 

* That's what my Polish mother in law used to say. That was one of the repeatible things after "Szwabe ****" etc. 

She kind of went off them after the Nazis invaded her village in 1939.

But hey ho. We live and forgive

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was an ex NATO figure on the radio yesterday (I forget who) saying that Germany would agree to sending Leopards if the US would agree to sending Abrams as they are a similar build, but it seems the US have no intention of allowing Abrams to go to Ukraine at all.

Kind of get Germanys position / reluctance on it if that’s actually the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Abdul_Latif said:

There was an ex NATO figure on the radio yesterday (I forget who) saying that Germany would agree to sending Leopards if the US would agree to sending Abrams as they are a similar build, but it seems the US have no intention of allowing Abrams to go to Ukraine at all.

Kind of get Germanys position / reluctance on it if that’s actually the case.

America claims that the Abrams is way too fuel hungry and too much training required to be practical for operating and maintaining, but it could be there's advanced tech in it they don't want the Russians to get hold of, or just that it's really expensive. 

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...