Jump to content

Russian invasion of Ukraine


Sonam

Recommended Posts

 

 an explosion at a coke plant killed 10 workers in the East of Ukraine. 

Apparently US howitzers have been deployed are in use already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Detournement said:

Why didn't they think of doing that in the East?

Build a wall and the USA will pay it.

Think they've wised up a bit after columns of tanks were caught on camera driving straight through their border posts on their way to cities like Kiev, Kherson and Melitopol on the first day of the war. Wouldn't be surprised if Transnistria gets dealt with before this is all over but the Ukrainians have way too much on their plate in the Donbas right now to be in a position to even think about opening up a new front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DiegoDiego said:


Less young men to chuck at it when they have literally double the population?

It doesn't matter how many grannies they have but how many fighting capable men they have. The age split of the population is very different from in 1850.  Not to mention that the Ukrainians have a morale advantage. Their young people are much more desperate to fight in their defensive war than Russians are happy to invade Ukraine.

3 hours ago, LongTimeLurker said:

Think they've wised up a bit after columns of tanks were caught on camera driving straight through their border posts on their way to cities like Kiev, Kherson and Melitopol on the first day of the war. Wouldn't be surprised if Transnistria gets dealt with before this is all over but the Ukrainians have way too much on their plate in the Donbas right now to be in a position to even think about opening up a new front.

From what I've read Transnistra could barely put up a day's fight. The army Russia has there isn't serious in the slightest. It's basically a drunk holiday destination for Russian soldiers. They have no serious equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole Transnistria thing reminds me of early in the conflict when there were reports Belarus was about to enter the fight. Then f**k all happened.
 

In my completely ignorant opinion, I doubt much will happen there until Russia figures out to get their troops there either via air or land bridge - which seems a ways away yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter how many grannies they have but how many fighting capable men they have. The age split of the population is very different from in 1850.  Not to mention that the Ukrainians have a morale advantage. Their young people are much more desperate to fight in their defensive war than Russians are happy to invade Ukraine.

Russia has roughly 33 million men of fighting age. At the time of the Crimean war the Russian Empire had about 38 million males in total. You've got this one badly wrong I'm afraid.

The morale advantage is completely irrelevant to the point I was making.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DiegoDiego said:


Russia has roughly 33 million men of fighting age. At the time of the Crimean war the Russian Empire had about 38 million males in total. You've got this one badly wrong I'm afraid.

The morale advantage is completely irrelevant to the point I was making.

And what are those figures relative to their respective opponents of the time? That's the real question rather than the raw numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what are those figures relative to their respective opponents of the time? That's the real question rather than the raw numbers.
No it's not. The question is about Russia's tolerance for hundreds of thousands of dead soldiers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FR4o8iTXoAAjIKJ?format=jpg&name=4096x409

 

There have been geolocated shots of Ukrainians in territory near Kharkiv that had been under Russian control since the early war. They weakened the forces for the push around Izyum. It seems Russias lack of manpower mean it still has to concede territory to build enough forces to gain some. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, DiegoDiego said:
8 hours ago, DMCs said:
And what are those figures relative to their respective opponents of the time? That's the real question rather than the raw numbers.

No it's not. The question is about Russia's tolerance for hundreds of thousands of dead soldiers.

You do not fight modern, mechanised warfare with hundreds of thousands of illiterate peasants as happened in the the Crimean and First World Wars. Battlefields are stunningly lethal. Artillery sorted out the idea of mass assault with poor coordination back in 1916. You have to go in in combined arms with all components functioning and in smaller units move quickly passed strong points, this was the way the Germans (infiltration tactics) and allies (combined arms with supporting tanks and artillery) were finally able to break the deadlock in 1918. Since then no one has succeeded against a serious opponent without them on conventional battlefield. 

It takes a lot of training to get men to be able to move armour and mechanised infantry in combination with their artillery support. Every component in the Russian full time army has shown significant deficiencies. How they move armour, how the debus mechanised infantry, their artillery they are using to hit entrenched positions (clearly mostly ground bursting not air bursting). 

Whats more Ukraine is now starting to receive actual decent western kit. Not just some last ditch type stuff like the hand held anti tank weapons. Proper artillery with far better range and accuracy like the M-777 replacing their shonky D-30s. Modern SPGs and even rumours of the M-270 MRLS system. 

Russia cannot conscript it way out of this mess. It would take months of genuine training to bring it army up to the kind of fitness, training and execution standards we would think of as being bare minimum for this kind of war. Then there are the deficiencies in things like secure radios, night vision kit, first aid and other medical supplies, the widespread use of GPS (well GLONASS) etc. 

Russia can conscript 33 million men. But they will be walking everywhere, struggling for rifles, have zero chance of coordinating with artillery let alone air to ground (that Russia has truly sucked at) so they will need 33 million body bags and someone to dig the graves at the end of it. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Homes for Ukrainian scheme seems to be having some issues

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61311046

In some local authority areas 30% of the applicants are single men over 40, some specifying they want to host single women in their 20s and 30s.

Edited by ICTChris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Homes for Ukrainian scheme seems to be having some issues
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61311046
In some local authority areas 30% of the applicants are single men over 40, some specifying they want to host single women in their 20s and 30s.
The Facebook groups that are causing the issues are not actually part of the scheme but folk are being driven down this route by the time the official route is taking. I've been working on software last couple of weeks for LAs to implement the changes required for HB and CTR and it's a tedious progress. It's probably surprising to no one that it's being used as a cover by those looking to exploit people be it sexually or financially.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...