Jump to content

Russian invasion of Ukraine


Sonam

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, BigDoddyKane said:

Is Glen Greenwald classed as right wing now?

He certainly seems to have more time for the right than the left these days . Big pals with Tucker Carlson for example. Maybe he's going back to how he started, defending white supremacists while claiming not to agree with them, backing the Iraq war and then recanting and supporting that massive racist and zero welfare advocate Ron Paul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greenwald has always been on good on freedom of speech and media stuff and pretty much publicly uninterested in anything else. His husband is an MP with an ultra leftist Brazilian Party and he has being talking shit about Lula recently. 

He has been unreadable on Twitter the past year or so but if Assange actually gets put in trial in the USA I think he'll redeem himself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Detournement said:

It looks more like Ukraine is going to invade Transnistria to attack the Russian forces there (which is obviously fair enough in a war). Then possibly Romanian forces are going to reinforce the Moldovan military to stop anything else kicking off.

The line was drawn in Minsk in 2016 and Ukraine and their backers decided to ignore it. There is no off ramp now. Ukraine will continue to fight until they run out of military age men then private military contractors will take over. 

 

zmLRkH.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Detournement said:

Russia clearly doesn't have the capacity to go to war in the "whole of Europe" or even western Ukraine. 

The US goal is to turn Ukraine into a European Afghanistan. They have openly admitted that and that's why Truss has been saying the war will last a decade. Horrific news for Ukranians but great for people who like putting flags in their Twitter and Facebook profiles. 

Agree with your first sentence.  If he declares war, he can mobilise the whole of the armed forces, something he can't do at the moment.  But they reckon he's lost around 1,000 tanks in Ukraine leaving him with about 1800 plus any of the mostly older tanks they can get out of storage.  EU member states have about 5,000 tanks between them.

Of course, tanks aren't everything these days, but supplying Ukraine with ATGMs must have depleted NATO/EU numbers too.

Edited by The DA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

So chicken and egg then about who broke it.

There was a period when the fighting largely stopped. There was not an inch given on the political side despite Zelensky being elected to do exactly that. 

Edited by Detournement
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there is a hope in hell that Russia genuinely mobilises. It would be a political disaster for them and would be no guarantee of a victory at all considering how much time it would take to get the men to the front lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a number of considerations about a Russian mobilisation. It would assist their forces as would obviously increase their manpower but would have significant downsides - it would take months to have an affect, clearly the mobilised troops would be of a lower quality than many of the full time soldiers. Mobilisation wouldn’t have an impact on the material losses suffered by Russia either. Michael Kofman did a podcast this week where he said what analysis of the war really shows is that the Russian Army is short of infantry, a mobilisation could help address that if the mobilised troops were properly equipped, motivated and trained.

Politically what mobilisation does is box Putin in - with it being a special operation he can pick and choose what is victory. If he mobilises then he is locked in to a maximalist goal. You can’t Mobilise the whole population and then say that gaining some villages and “liberating” Mariupol is a victory. Also, he clearly doesn’t want to do it, which is why he hasn’t and why the war has been framed as a ‘special operation’.

Regarding Transnistria, it doesn’t seem likely that Ukraine are going to move against them but then Russia trying to escalate doesn’t make sense either. The value in the troops stationed there is pretty low - there are about 1500 Russian troops there and 7,500 Transnistrian troops. These are not high quality forces, not likely to make a significant difference to the war. One of the mistakes Russia made was to try and open too many fronts, they are addressing this (to an extent) by focusing on the Donbas, opening a front far away from Russian forces who could support them and potentially pulling in other countries to the war doesn’t seem very clever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Detective Jimmy McNulty said:

 

They were provoked.
Let me know when yer Pope talks about Hillary Clinton's biolabs, neo-Nazis, false flag operations, and the deep state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Detournement said:

It looks more like Ukraine is going to invade Transnistria to attack the Russian forces there (which is obviously fair enough in a war). Then possibly Romanian forces are going to reinforce the Moldovan military to stop anything else kicking off.

The line was drawn in Minsk in 2016 and Ukraine and their backers decided to ignore it. There is no off ramp now. Ukraine will continue to fight until they run out of military age men then private military contractors will take over. 

Clearly.

Spoiler

6FA09929-E5E1-4C73-AB87-0CD4B1E27788.jpeg.09766f434f1224512bc1ca82df8afd22.jpeg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there is a hope in hell that Russia genuinely mobilises. It would be a political disaster for them and would be no guarantee of a victory at all considering how much time it would take to get the men to the front lines.
That makes sense, but it didn't stop them in Crimea (back in 18whateveritwas). They chucked half a million soon to be dead bodies at it despite being technologically inferior and got skelped.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DiegoDiego said:
1 hour ago, DMCs said:
I don't think there is a hope in hell that Russia genuinely mobilises. It would be a political disaster for them and would be no guarantee of a victory at all considering how much time it would take to get the men to the front lines.

That makes sense, but it didn't stop them in Crimea (back in 18whateveritwas). They chucked half a million soon to be dead bodies at it despite being technologically inferior and got skelped.

Vastly different demographic situation. Russia is now a much older country and has less young men to chuck at it. Plus it's generally the young Russians living in major cities that are most opposed to the war. Which is why their current invasion force has more ethnic minorities and folk from the economically struggling peripheries as they have less economic options and they tend to be younger than the population at large.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...