Jump to content

Not so Flawless TV


Recommended Posts

If you carry out a fraud that nets you millions of pounds you can expect a hefty sentence.  The most serious category for fraud in sentencing guidelines is anything over £500,000 and it was estimated that this gang made more than £7m during their time running the scheme.  They also hacked legitimate customers of streaming services in order to steal their identities for the purposes of covering their tracks, effectively setting up innocent people to take the blame.  They had undercover operators inside anti-piracy groups to assist with their operations.  The leader, who received 11 years in prison, is still under investigation for other crimes and one of the gang was also arrested for having child abuse images and other illegal images.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, ICTChris said:

If you carry out a fraud that nets you millions of pounds you can expect a hefty sentence.  The most serious category for fraud in sentencing guidelines is anything over £500,000 and it was estimated that this gang made more than £7m during their time running the scheme.  They also hacked legitimate customers of streaming services in order to steal their identities for the purposes of covering their tracks, effectively setting up innocent people to take the blame.  They had undercover operators inside anti-piracy groups to assist with their operations.  The leader, who received 11 years in prison, is still under investigation for other crimes and one of the gang was also arrested for having child abuse images and other illegal images.

One of your colleagues being a beast shouldn't impact the sentence. 

The value of the proceeds shouldn't imo determine the seriousness of the crime. I know it does, but that's because the law and law enforcement values rich people's stuff more than people. 

Not saying this was a victimless crime or trivial, but violation of exclusive broadcasting rights shouldn't be among the most serious of crimes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Richey Edwards said:

Where would you hide a dodgy telly stick when the police chap your door?

I'm not convinced you'd need to. Surely it's up to the seller to ensure they have licences to sell a service, not the buyer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) once tried to sue Limewire for $72 Trillion dollars..

better believe it copyright isn't big business..

wanted $105,000 per pirated song.

1 minute ago, Mark Connolly said:

Unless you are a Tory donor/minister

or a certain Baroness

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bob in Denny said:

The RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) once tried to sue Limewire for $72 Trillion dollars..

better believe it copyright isn't big business..

wanted $105,000 per pirated song.

or a certain Baroness

Does Dr Evil run the RIAA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, itzdrk said:

I really liked this quote at the end of the paragraph:

Screenshot_20230531-105702.thumb.png.4487dedd606d7a22eb18c156cbde67e9.png

What is it that 'Mr Love' thinks that pornography does to your devices? :lol:

I guess younger kids might be exposed to the porn when they only wanted to watch a game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, itzdrk said:

I really liked this quote at the end of the paragraph:

Screenshot_20230531-105702.thumb.png.4487dedd606d7a22eb18c156cbde67e9.png

What is it that 'Mr Love' thinks that pornography does to your devices? :lol:

On a serious note there was a yearly prize at one of these cybersecurity conventions (may have been def-con but my memory is hazy) 

And one of the zero-day hacks acquired full access to your computer by visiting a website... not even from your computer but while the computer was running a virtual machine inside it and visiting a website.

I think there was another story where professional poker players were all targeted by various attacks so the attacker could see their hands in real time and gamble accordingly. The advice they were given was only ever use your device for playing poker. Don't watch porn on it, don't play games on it  and even that didn't work for some who were targeted by visiting a compromised poker website. Be suspicious. The general trend on the internet has advanced to if someone is giving you something for free you are the product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Todd_is_God said:

I'm not convinced you'd need to. Surely it's up to the seller to ensure they have licences to sell a service, not the buyer?

I didn't realise the guy I bought cocaine from was not a registered and licensed pharmacist, officer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Richey Edwards said:

I didn't realise the guy I bought cocaine from was not a registered and licensed pharmacist, officer.

Illegal to possess cocaine though. Footage of Harry Maguire playing football should probably be illegal too right enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Richey Edwards said:

I didn't realise the guy I bought cocaine from was not a registered and licensed pharmacist, officer.

 

21 minutes ago, LeodhasXD said:

Illegal to possess cocaine though. Footage of Harry Maguire playing football should probably be illegal too right enough.

Unlike purchasing and possessing cocaine, it's not illegal to stream foreign tv channels or services in the UK.

Edited by Todd_is_God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...