Craig fae the Vale Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 3 minutes ago, Claudia Gentile said: Big sexy on to score the winner? Mrs fae the Vale's favourite player. Nothing to do with his footballing ability. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Brightside Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Excuse me Ronald, where the f**k is big Wout?! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Brightside Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Just now, Mr. Brightside said: Excuse me Ronald, where the f**k is big Wout?! Thanks Ronald x 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invergowrie arab Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 I don't think keepers should be expected to dive head first into the knees of strikers to demonstrate interference 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsforlife Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Clearly offside, can't believe the absolute fuckwits(mainly commentary) who are genuinely trying to claim having a man that close doesn't affect the goalkeeper 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MazzyStar Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 DUMFRIES MENTIONED!!! LETS GOOOOOO 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claudia Gentile Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 2 minutes ago, Craig fae the Vale said: Mrs fae the Vale's favourite player. Nothing to do with his footballing ability. Tbf I'd probably let him ride me and I'm not gay. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamonds are Forever Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 1 minute ago, Hammerafc said: Except he wasn't standing in front of the keeper. Being 'in front' is irrelevant. The law states they have to be 'in the way of an opponent' which he clearly was, there's no way the keeper could have dived and got the ball with the player standing there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScarf Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 It was the correct decision imo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammerafc Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 The one thing I do agree with is that Taylor gave interference on field and there was nothing to conclusively say that was the wrong call so on field decision stands. Would have been interesting if the goal had been given what the var decision would have been. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Problemo Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Fine with the decision, the length of time was utterly farcical though - it was a ten second decision. I’m assuming they have stopped sending referees to the screen for subjective offsides. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claudia Gentile Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Just now, TheScarf said: It was the correct decision imo. It was just the time taken by Attwell that put any doubt in my mind. Correct decision. Eventually. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MazzyStar Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 5 minutes ago, invergowrie arab said: I don't think keepers should be expected to dive head first into the knees of strikers to demonstrate interference I think they should. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Psychosis Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 I'm not normally someone who gets wound up by players making the most of challenges but f**k me both teams here are absolute wee shites all round. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Paul Mitchell thinks it was the wrong decision. I’m now even more convinced it was right. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 1 minute ago, No_Problemo said: Fine with the decision, the length of time was utterly farcical though - it was a ten second decision. I’m assuming they have stopped sending referees to the screen for subjective offsides. It was given offside originally. They’d have only sent him to the screen if they felt that was wrong. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claudia Gentile Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Netherlands have defended very well and deserve a clean-sheet at least. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Kounde seems quite a limited right back. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Psychosis Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Just now, Claudia Gentile said: Netherlands have defended very well and deserve a clean-sheet at least. France have missed two tap-ins tbf. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peil Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 This has been shite 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.