Granny Danger Posted Wednesday at 19:04 Share Posted Wednesday at 19:04 1 hour ago, O_Kahn said: This woman is surely at it? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crl8nwx6ynzo Right Said Fred and Darren Grimes are amongst the luminaries on X congratulating her on the charges being dropped She sounds like a c**t. That’s not a crime either. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hk blues Posted Thursday at 05:42 Share Posted Thursday at 05:42 12 hours ago, O_Kahn said: This woman is surely at it? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crl8nwx6ynzo Right Said Fred and Darren Grimes are amongst the luminaries on X congratulating her on the charges being dropped Fair do's the charges were dropped but she can hardly argue she did nothing wrong - she sounds like she thinks she's the victim. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted Thursday at 06:05 Share Posted Thursday at 06:05 12 hours ago, Todd_is_God said: I'm not entirely sure what the alleged crime was here tbh, as the article doesn't say. It's not illegal to spread misinformation online (it can be defamatory, but only the person being defamed can claim this and it's not a criminal offence anyway). Even the press, who are bound to standards in print media, can publish fake news online. It can be illegal Section 179(1) OSA 2023 creates a summary offence of sending false communications. The offence is committed if: a person sends a message (as defined in section 182 OSA 2023); the message conveys information that the person knows to be false; at the time of sending it, the person intended the message, or the information in it, to cause non-trivial psychological or physical harm to a likely audience; and the person has no reasonable excuse for sending the message. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.