Jump to content

Madeleine Mccann Missing Girl


Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, dogmc said:


It's possible to have a fractured skull n no external bleeding. Is why concussion is such a big issue in rugby now. Fwiw I'd agree on the od.

If cerebral spinal fluid is even leaking out of her ears and nose, I'd still expect blood as well. Dead toddlers on the stairs are quite noticeable as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, throbber said:

She could have waddled out to the middle of the road and got knocked down by a drunk driver and then disposed of like the kid in the missing season 1.

I thought of that, but a car hitting a three year old is liable to leave more than just traces on the road. It would need to be a very clinical driver, with a very good reason not to want caught to hit, scoop up and dispose of a dead or seriously injured kid. Unless mortally drunk and or speeding, you've just hit a kid who wandered in to the road. No blame there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst not permissible in court, why don't the McCanns and their "fun friends" who were present on the holiday all do independently scrutinised polygraph tests to dismiss all the conspiracy theorists once and for all ??  This would also clear up the conflicting accounts given of the timelines and whereabouts of each of them from the morning of the 03 May 2007 till the early hours of the following morning.  

The cadaver dogs have unearthed something tangible and sinister.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, throbber said:

Unless there is some sort of satanic child slaughtering ritual going on then I don't believe any of their friends are lying or hiding anything, would be pretty hard to convince people you had just met on holiday to keep quiet about the death of their child wouldn't it?

I'm sure they were on holiday with close friends. Very "close" if you believe some stories....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, throbber said:

 


Yeah well there was that unsettling story about one of their friends they made a sexual comment about Maddie and he was on holiday at the same time. As I have said though they would need to be in some sort of cult/paedo ring for it to be a cover up and I just don't believe they are, most people just judge them because they are a bit of a weird couple as if it's enough evidence to suggest they were sick of Maddie and decided to get rid of her.

I love a good conspiracy but this one doesn't do it for me.

 

I think they get more than enough leeway on the basis they're middle class doctors.

Compare and contrast their treatment in the media when Shannon Mathews went missing. (Prior to Shannon being found)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sjc said:

I think they get more than enough leeway on the basis they're middle class doctors.

Compare and contrast their treatment in the media when Shannon Mathews went missing. (Prior to Shannon being found)

I don't think that's a great comparison to be fair...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, throbber said:

Yeah they do get more attention but for the red top papers it's as interesting a story as they can hope for because the parents are well off. I doubt they would have the same ability to manipulate it for all it's worth if the parents were undesirable scheme goblins.
.

 

Have you been talking to Reynard again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lisa Cuddy said:

I don't think that's a great comparison to be fair...

In hindsight, yes of course. I was referring to before it emerged just how much of a scumbag Shannons mum was. The media didn't follow the same line as in the McCanns case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, throbber said:

 


The most important thing though is that the media couldn't care less about the welfare of the missing child and only care about the story so they can make plenty money out of it and so that certain journalists can cover the story and get attention out of it. Upon hearing that a child has gone missing they already know what line they can take and how they can manipulate the story as much as possible, and middle class successful parents are easier to demonise I suppose. They won't be thinking for one second about if the child is dead or alive as any sort of decent human being might.

 

Far be it for me to defend the media but when it came to making money out of a missing child the McCanns benefitted far more than the media.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, throbber said:

 


Not really, they were off work for large spells of time because of this, I don't know the ins and outs of their financial situation but this story is as good as there has been in the last 20 years for the papers who have manipulated it so much.

 

The Maddie "fund" raised millions! Doctors aren't that highly paid mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...