54_and_counting Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 kate and gerry did it, the 2 dogs both scented cadaverine and blood in the apartment and in the rented car, f**k that lying c**t gerry he clearly has something shifty about him 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DI Bruce Robertson Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Mmhm 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 1 minute ago, throbber said: I don't know how much they made out of it there was something posted in this thread a while back which showed how much they had and where the money went etc. The money isn't going in their pocket and they are still a child down, I'm pretty sure they would rather have the child and their old lives back. The scum bag newspapers on the other hand are delighted that all this has taken place as they have milked it since day one. The scumbag newspapers didn't "lose" the said child. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resk Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Some Puerto Rican guy IMO. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Occam's razor should be applied. Obviously they killed her in cold blood and sold her off to a North African dead child collector in order to make a few quid, and it was subsequently covered up by MI5 and Gordon Brown because they were Doctors. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Just now, throbber said: The abductor may have been paid by the daily mail to boost paper sales. More plausible than her being taken by an opportunist I suppose...... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlipperyP Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 If only we had Gerrys auntie to clarify what the hell went on. She also dissapeared after posting on here 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 1 minute ago, throbber said: There could well have been an opportunist abductor though who was aware there were unattended children in the vicinity. True. She could still be hidden under his desk at the Daily Mails offices too... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 11 minutes ago, throbber said: There could well have been an opportunist abductor though who was aware there were unattended children in the vicinity. That's probably the likeliest scenario. Can anyone recall how long the McCanns had been at the staying at the resort when this happened? Had they got into a habit of leaving their kids on their own? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 21 minutes ago, SlipperyP said: If only we had Gerrys auntie to clarify what the hell went on. She also dissapeared after posting on here Big Phil posted on here? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 8 minutes ago, throbber said: I think they were meant to be staying a fortnight and were at start of the second week? They had left the kids alone before, one time Kate got back and Madeline asked why she had left them alone, Kate wrote about this in her book. It's not that unlikely that some weirdo could have been watching them the entire time they were there and seized their moment, there are a lot of sick people in the world after all so it's not really that unlikely. You would have thought that might have told them something. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
54_and_counting Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 8 minutes ago, throbber said: I think they were meant to be staying a fortnight and were at start of the second week? They had left the kids alone before, one time Kate got back and Madeline asked why she had left them alone, Kate wrote about this in her book. It's not that unlikely that some weirdo could have been watching them the entire time they were there and seized their moment, there are a lot of sick people in the world after all so it's not really that unlikely. going by the mccanns "story" the abductor seemingly had a window of opportunity of an hour at best to break into the apartment through shutters that could only be opened from the inside abduct madeleine from her bed, without waking the twins or her go back to the same window as previous, manage to get himself out the window, along with a sleeping child, a window that was 3 feet off the ground, and not leave a single trace of evidence that either went through the window get madeleine to wherever she was going with no one seeing him or her plus the fact that gerry especially of the two parents looks a right shiftless b*****d 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellaboz Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 I'm starting to believe this child never even existed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Just now, Stellaboz said: I'm starting to believe this child never even existed. Good point. I'd never heard of her before 10 years ago, then suddenly she's all over the news. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 1 hour ago, throbber said: The most important thing though is that the media couldn't care less about the welfare of the missing child and only care about the story so they can make plenty money out of it and so that certain journalists can cover the story and get attention out of it. Upon hearing that a child has gone missing they already know what line they can take and how they can manipulate the story as much as possible, and middle class successful parents are easier to demonise I suppose. They won't be thinking for one second about if the child is dead or alive as any sort of decent human being might. Are you for real, they've been treated with the lightest of kid gloves in this case. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 1 minute ago, ayrmad said: Are you for real, they've been treated with the lightest of kid gloves in this case. Production of gloves made out of actual kids might be the reason they sold her off. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 23 minutes ago, throbber said: I am for real but you are right and wrong with what you have said. Over all they have been let off by the authorities who would have looked at it differently but the media are constantly toying with the idea that the parents were involved to keep people second guessing their credibility and therefore maintaining interest in the case. The media would love it if the parents did get proven to be involved and would utterly destroy them. Probably because they have been as unimpressed with them as the rest of us. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardinal Richelieu Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 (edited) Polygraphs are a crock of shit. But 12 seconds though... edit: "We're not going to comment on anything", then comments on it, rubs ear and mentions sedatives (not Calpol). Case closed m'lud. Edited April 30, 2017 by Cardinal Richelieu 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marty_j Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 She washed the kids toy which I always found odd. Also did they not phone Sky news before they called the police? The UK tabloids where asking questions early in the case but then Express got sued and now no one even mentions they scenario that they were involved. Fucking strange met police haven't interviewed them seeing as they have spunked 11 million on the case. Also the questions Kate refused to answer http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/48-questions-kate-mccann-refused-to-answer-madeleine-disappearance-portugal-a7710111.html 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tree house tam Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, throbber said: I am for real but you are right and wrong with what you have said. Over all they have been let off by the authorities who would have looked at it differently but the media are constantly toying with the idea that the parents were involved to keep people second guessing their credibility and therefore maintaining interest in the case. The media would love it if the parents did get proven to be involved and would utterly destroy them. The reason the media are keen to keep people guessing is because it's just as likely to be the parents as much as an intruder. There is no conclusive evidence otherwise. If they did have any involvement they deserve to be utterly destroyed. In fact, they deserve to be destroyed, literally, for leaving their kids in the first place. When my kids were young and we were on holiday, we had reservations for restaurants that had to be cancelled because they'd fallen asleep or weren't feeling great. You just grab a pizza or get room service and you stay with the kids. What the McCanns did Is despicable. Edited April 30, 2017 by tree house tam Stupid phone 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.