Colin M Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 I have been shouted down umpteen times by the same do gooders, who cannot see the facts in front of them......... It's good that you followed that up with a big load of conjecture and speculation Anyway - High Fidelity, originally in England and moved to Chicago. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 It might be an idea if they told their spokespeople to STFU for a few days, given what is going on. Just a thought but surely there are different degrees of DNA that could be found in their car. If they just found traces of DNA then it could have an innocent explanation, if they find oodles of blood then perhaps not. I don't know anything about DNA though, perhaps blootoooner can answer? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightswoodBear Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetooner Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 (edited) With the McCann 'fund' up to over £1m it would be funny watching all the do-gooders squirm if it turned out they had done it themselves I doubt the do-gooders would squirm. They will (rightly) be incredibly pissed off that they had been "had" by the McCanns, but does that mean they are going to be "squirming"? It might be an idea if they told their spokespeople to STFU for a few days, given what is going on.Just a thought but surely there are different degrees of DNA that could be found in their car. If they just found traces of DNA then it could have an innocent explanation, if they find oodles of blood then perhaps not. I don't know anything about DNA though, perhaps blootoooner can answer? It all depends what they found. The DNA will not change as it is identical in every cell of your body, but what they found the DNA in will. If it is a hair, then it could have been transferred from clothing that was put in the back seat. If it is any blood whatsoever, then obviously it was there after the McCanns got the car. If that is the case, i doubt very much it is still the McCanns, as would they have had the privacy to get the body, put it in the boot/hide it and dump it somewhere? Im with Div however, and can't see this as hiding a mistake/overdose. They would have to be master villains to keep this a secret for so long, something would have slipped by now. As for the idea that Maddie had a terminal illness, and it was a "mercy killing", that fits perfectly with a CSI episode i watched yesterday, where a woman was going to be murdered (the miniature killer had tipped off CSI), she had parkinsons and her brother killed her in the exact same way to hide it as not being euthanasia. He got caught because of his tears. Edited September 7, 2007 by bluetooner 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fudge Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 I've seen people on here and on other foums discuss how the body could have been exposed of. i've not read this full thread so someone has probably already mentioned it, but there is a big wet thing called 'the sea' close by which is pretty good for hiding stuff. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightswoodBear Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Tell us more about this "the sea" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetooner Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 I've seen people on here and on other foums discuss how the body could have been exposed of. i've not read this full thread so someone has probably already mentioned it, but there is a big wet thing called 'the sea' close by which is pretty good for hiding stuff. Not really. The tides would probably have washed it ashore at some point. Very risky. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fudge Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Not really. The tides would probably have washed it ashore at some point. Very risky. Done the right way, there would be virtually no chance of the boddy being found it it was in some sort of weighted container. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Not really. The tides would probably have washed it ashore at some point. Very risky. I read a book about the South African intelligence service not long ago and the old apartheid-era mathematically calculated how far out to sea they'd have to dump the bodies of ANC activists before they wouldn't get washed up I think it was about two and a half miles or something. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swampy Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 (edited) It's good that you followed that up with a big load of conjecture and speculation Anyway - High Fidelity, originally in England and moved to Chicago. Not a true story. A mediocre story, yes, but not a true one. Edited September 7, 2007 by Swampy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetooner Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 (edited) Done the right way, there would be virtually no chance of the boddy being found it it was in some sort of weighted container. Again, if it was all a terrible accident they were hiding, do you really think they a) would think about weighing her down and b ) be able to do it properly? Edited September 7, 2007 by bluetooner 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetooner Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Not a true story.A mediocre story, yes, but not a true one. There was also an americanised version of Fever pitch. (same can be said of that) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin M Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Not a true story.A mediocre story, yes, but not a true one. Oh bollocks It is pish though, it would have been much improved if they added in a bit of child murder to all the talk of how to catalogue your records. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Again, if it was all a terrible accident they were hiding, do you really think they a) would think about weighing her down and b ) be able to do it properly? So if they are involved and it is a terrible accident they have been really luck hiding the body? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swampy Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Oh bollocks It is pish though, it would have been much improved if they added in a bit of child murder to all the talk of how to catalogue your records. I agree, a bit of a cameo from Paul Gadd and you've easily got BAFTA- sorry, Oscar material right there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetooner Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 So if they are involved and it is a terrible accident they have been really luck hiding the body? I think so yes. I just don't think that they would hold up to any scrutiny if it was all an accident. If they are really psychotic, calculated cold blooded killers, thats a different story. Just the panic of what to do in that situation would mean mistakes would be made and the body found. (in my opinion anyway) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northfootie Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 (edited) i reckon kate accidently killed maddie,and got robert murat to remove+ hide the body,then 25 days later when cops were looking into abduction theory she moved the body elsewhere.i dont think gerry was involved but knows what happened Edited September 7, 2007 by ictforeurope 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H Wragg Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 According to Sky News, Philomena McCann says that kate was offered a "deal" of a reduced 2 year sentence if she confessed to accidentally killing her daughter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnstoun Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Oh bollocks It is pish though, it would have been much improved if they added in a bit of child murder to all the talk of how to catalogue your records. I tried but couldn't bring myself to start a 'top 5 murders' thread in your honour. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnstoun Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 I wonder what they will do with the fund if it turns out that they are guilty Apart from making a movie out of it starring Steve Buscemi, Rowan Atkinson, Pee-wee Herman etc The puppets from 'Team America' would be grateful for the work. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.