Jump to content

Israel And The Palestinians (now with added Iran/Lebanon)


xbl

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, scottsdad said:

Trouble brewing in academia because of this. 

UKRI, which funds most UK research, brought together a panel of people on equality, diversity and inclusion. A couple of members of this committee on twitter made some comments about the conflict. Specifically, a link to a Guardian article about Suella Braverman wanting police to crackdown on protestors - one academic replied saying that was disturbing. Another academic wrote something else also. 

Michelle Donelan (the science minister) then wrote to UKRI quite hysterically demanding that the whole committee be removed...and the UKRI folded like a pack of cards. They have suspended the entire committee and will look at how it managed EDI in future. 

2500 academics have signed an open letter condemning this. There are calls to boycott reviewing bids (which would essentially shut down university research). 

The same Michelle Donelan who has spoken in the past about the need for free speech in universities.

Don’t you lot have some sort of free speech Tsar that will sort this all out? You know because free and open debate is a cornerstone of democracy or something. Maybe that’s only a trans thing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, virginton said:

US intelligence clearly did not know that an attack would happen on September 11th 2001. Unless you think that they deliberately placed the President and Commander in Chief in an unsecured school room at the time of this known attack - where he stayed inexplicably frozen by reports of the event. And also allowed terrorists to fly a plane into the fucking Pentagon itself for... batshit mental, conspiracist reasons. 

But yep, instead of prioritising the security of those key institutions of American power, they instead circled the wagons around, err,  the mayor of San Francisco. 🤡

I think from having watched a lot of interviews with CIA and FBI sources at the time that they had an interest in some of the hijackers, but had no idea what they had planned or that they had an imminent attack on the US planned either. Where it gets murky is the stuff around the state assistance given to some of the hijackers by the Saudi government. There is a school of thought that one government did know about the 9/11 plans and it wasnt the US, it was the Saudis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, virginton said:

What would be the benefit to US Intelligence to have their Commander in Chief gurning like a clown in front of TV cameras instead of responding to a national emergency? Why - if intelligence services had knowledge that an attack by Al Qaeda was imminent - would they assume that the attacks they knew about were the only attacks planned? Which is where your '1,000 miles from safety' claim falls apart. 

And what benefit accrued to US intelligence by having a fucking plane smash into the Pentagon and arbitrarily destroying and killing key US infrastructure and personnel? 

This is why historians apply logic and reason to weigh 'first-hand accounts' and bin the ones that are clearly nonsense. Just as a court discounts 'eyewitness testimony' that does not match the rest of the evidence, or stand up to scrutiny. 

Anyone saying that Israel's security services knew about the attack and made a conscious decision to let Hamas proceed is either an anti-Semite, or an absolute fucking moron

You can sort yourself into whichever category you choose. 

Or both.

Edited by DeeTillEhDeh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scottsdad said:

The same Michelle Donelan who has spoken in the past about the need for free speech in universities.

Yes but not THIS kind of free speech!

The sort of free speech that allows you to trample the equality act is all her protestations have been about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Scroll down to see the interview.  I cannot think of anyone in our media who would persevere in this way.

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/cnn-host-asks-netanyahu-adviser-to-estimate-deaths-in-refugee-camp_uk_6543a9a8e4b0cde80b8bdbe5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said:

I think from having watched a lot of interviews with CIA and FBI sources at the time that they had an interest in some of the hijackers, but had no idea what they had planned or that they had an imminent attack on the US planned either. Where it gets murky is the stuff around the state assistance given to some of the hijackers by the Saudi government. There is a school of thought that one government did know about the 9/11 plans and it wasnt the US, it was the Saudis. 

There is an ongoing case involving the 9/11 Families v the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia moving through the New York Court system - I'm sure the recent Saudi investment in global sports is nothing other than co-incidental:

https://www.propublica.org/article/sept-11-family-lawsuit-saudi-spy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CTQP1867 said:

There is an ongoing case involving the 9/11 Families v the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia moving through the New York Court system - I'm sure the recent Saudi investment in global sports is nothing other than co-incidental:

https://www.propublica.org/article/sept-11-family-lawsuit-saudi-spy

Yep, i dont want to derail this thread any more but yes, im aware of that trial, theres a lot of evidence around Saudi officials doing work to get the hijackers accomodated in California and integrated with a mosque there, cant remember all the details but it seems pretty damning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/nov/03/war-israel-hamas-conflict-peace-extremists

A pretty even-handed and rational assessment of the politics, but the closing argument that a two state solution is the long-term answer looks for the birds now. 

Meanwhile IDF has been targeting terrorist ambulances, whatever they are. At least they're not flat-out obfuscating or denying that claim, which suggests there is some response to international pressure by providing transparency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ewanandmoreagain said:

What is the meaning  of "deep dive " here please ?

It’s kinda like a press quango, for a comparison. It’s not the same, but in principle it’s close…it’s a few reporters getting together with a bunch of experts in the field to sort out what is known and/or provable, and then producing a feature on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, virginton said:

Meanwhile IDF has been targeting terrorist ambulances, whatever they are.

Terrorist ambulances are used to transport terrorist old dears from their terrorist care homes over to their terrorist Bingo Hall.

HTH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...