sophia

He's finally getting to the starting point of the counterfactual. I'm not at all sure what to make of him spending twelve months steadily adopting the ideas of his main rival.

Question is... Are you going to do the honourable thing and retract or persist and lose any shred of credibility that you may or may not have had?

Indeed and especially as she is flat out wrong. Self indulgent twitter and bubble debate has seen to them. Patrick went rogue and every interested grown up sucked air as he ended his career and his party's influence.

I went looking for footage of that quite extraordinarily bad behaviour that gave the game away but couldn't find it. I do though recall Tom Gordon with his pomposity tazer turned up to max asking what he obviously thought were daily smart questions. His idiocy far outweighed his pertinency It would do you great credit if you would extend yourself to the foothills of credibility

On its independence in 1960 Tanzania had a grand total of 3 medical doctors and 2 engineers. The Congo had 3 native university graduates on its independence. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m001y8gg

I'm told that there's been a marked improvement in attainment, especially in English and in spelling in particular.

Looks like he didn't bother to change the lamp shade when he moved in

Tom English and his semi final report... That was down the Rangers end and they let him have it. Not fury, but a lot of angst. A plaintive cry of the masses. Silva didn't score, though. In collapsing to the floor, Silva looked like an octopus falling out of a tree. Somewhere out there, Peter van Vossen was celebrating. No longer the holder of the greatest missed sitter award.

Their loose is your gain

I saw that one, it was baffling. Rangers got a goal disallowed in Europe recently for a similar misdemeanor by Morelos.

The BBC have used it for the duration of this farrago and it has puzzled me on each hearing. The obvious reading is that they are no longer biblical in their relationship but if that were to be so, why would such a powerful woman be hinging about in such an environment? People have to know.

Never a good look with that or indeed being associated with the company that are positively engaging with you and your misunderstanding of the policy.

The worst penalty I've ever seen and the good news keeps rolling in

I also listened to the interview and I thought she did well in expressing that the policy is part of a strategy that is supported by a wide range of objective experts. The only significant opposition is coming from the loud mouth and simplistic tories.