stanley
-
Posts
878 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by stanley
-
-
Are we expecting only Glenafton, Carluke and Creetown as newly licensed teams?
0 -
2 hours ago, Basile Boli said:
Heard from a good source the Central league will be running a 19’s league next season. Knew that wouldn’t take long. Unsure of details at this stage
Tweet from Glasgow Athletic 2005s: Looking forward to attending the
meeting at Hampden tomorrow re the new 19s league for next season. Any other 19s going? or would like info on the times etc please DM and I’ll pass them on.
0 -
9 minutes ago, mick90 said:
Whitehills are also returning from abeyance.
16 in the premier and 15 in the first next season?
0 -
7 minutes ago, Bundesliga Boy said:
You could well be right concerning the SFA. I just think it all seems a tad fishy.
What disappoints me most about Hears is that they could have started at the bottom and worked their way up the pyramid on merit.
Infact If they had done that a few seasons back when there were Conferences, it would have been far easier to have made rapid progress, were they to have been succesful on the field of course.
I'm not sure the EoS would have accepted them. I believe the last time they accepted any new B teams into the league was in 2013 after the formation of the Lowland League. Spartans and Stirling University left behind reserve sides, Hibs came in for one season only and Berwick had their last of a four season spell in the league. Since then, Spartans have gone and Stirling University remain just because they were already in the league.
If allowed in, they certainly wouldn't have been allowed promotion to the Lowland League.
1 -
2 hours ago, parsforlife said:
You don’t accidentally become ‘one of the teams’. By agreeing to be so you accept the negative consequences and stump up a fee for nothing more than your self-interest, a poorly analysed self-interest at that.
Formally I don’t see who has proposed this, but my suspicion is the SFA board/Maxwell with the 3/4 scumbag clubs not officially announced, but it would have never have come up without certain shitty clubs wanting it.
Yes, I am aware that it is no accident. Hearts (along with the Old Firm) obviously wanted a B team in the pyramid and are clearly happy to be part of the Conference League. Without the three clubs being part of this, the idea would fall apart. The Lowland League also have some share of the blame by accepting B teams in the first place and opening the door to ideas like this.
What worries me more than anything about this whole idea is, as you mentioned, that this feels like those running the game are driving it (or, at the very least, actively supporting it). If this was simply a couple of clubs pushing it then it could be rejected and go away but I don't think this will be over after the rejection of the Conference League.
0 -
14 minutes ago, Bundesliga Boy said:
Supposed to be according to whom exactly? Was all hearsay - nothing official from the club. They were merely invited to be the fourth club.
Hearts on the other hand have a B team in the pyramid and are one of the three clubs, again, actually proposing the Conference - that's a pretty big difference right there!
Either way, I'm more confident than ever now that this absolute monstrosity will be voted down within the next 48 hours or so. (personally I'd then kick all 3 out the LL immediately after this farce but that's perhaps my pettiness coming through).
Are Hearts actually "proposing" it or just part of the new league if it is approved? I'm 100% against the idea and against B teams in the Lowland League but not sure what our involvement in this is other than being one of the teams.
0 -
12 hours ago, craigkillie said:
I think this is a bit unfair, this is a general point about a national 5th tier rather than this specific proposed division. Even their statement, as mewling as it was, criticised the specific planned make-up of the division.I don't think a national tier 5 will appeal to many regardless if the make-up of the division.
0 -
2 hours ago, Connor7 said:
Get Clyde in the sea. Terrible statement begging their owners to vote yes.
They'll be in the Lowland League (or Conference League...) soon enough.
1 -
11 minutes ago, Cowdenleith said:
Yeah, it does seem it will be a struggle, crowds will be back to next to nothing I imagine.
Coming round to the idea that these nomadic clubs should have so long to secure a permanent ground of their own, or goodbye. A decent period of time, but if they can’t find somewhere in say, 10 years, they’re not really a club anymore just a shell.
It all seems a bit pointless in their case. BSC Glasgow, Broomhill, Open Goal Broomhill, back to Broomhill. Maryhill, Alloa, Cumbernauld and now Dumbarton. They have no roots or identity at all. I'm not sure why they bother.
5 -
23 minutes ago, Burnieman said:
https://www.clydefc.co.uk/news/2023/05/club-statement-conference-league/
Potential here for another addition to the w*nk list.
"The establishment of a Conference league bringing the best of the Lowland and Highland League together is to be welcomed as it provides a better “destination” for clubs exiting the SPFL. "
4 B-teams and 6 first teams including playing the B-teams in 16/36 matches is a better destination than the Highland or Lowland League? Strange take on it.
0 -
4 hours ago, Cowdenleith said:
Confirmed that they will play out of Dumbarton’s stadium for the next 5 years.
Optimistic to think they will still be on the go in 5 years? I suppose they have survived this long with two name changes and multiple relocations...
0 -
35 minutes ago, Toby said:
There’s more too that if you read the statement, though.
There’s only a small sample of quotes, but if you read MCT’s take on it, they seem to feel that most of the 19% are in favour of some sort of reconstruction, but against the inclusion of B Teams.
Fair enough, I just skimmed it briefly. Main thing is the vote against
0 -
1 hour ago, Toby said:
https://twitter.com/tonclubtogether/status/1662363466978451456?s=46&t=mPi-CBP2m1lKxRNMQCkJuA
Results from MCT’s poll of supporters announced this morning. Given that MCT have around an 80% stake in Morton, it can be assumed with a degree of certainty that our magnificent club will be in the good guys list.
Shocked that 19% voted in favour of it.
0 -
41 minutes ago, Ginaro said:
Interesting to note that all three winners of the East Superleague in the Lowland area (i.e. except Lochee and Tayport) have now won the EOS and been promoted to the LL.
Four?
1 -
Although he may meet the criteria of having played for the B team and first team, Connor Smith is already 21 and has had several loan spells and played first team football for Hearts before this season so it would be a big leap to suggest the B team has done anything to increase his chances of making it at Hearts.
0 -
If the Conference is rejected then I hope fans and clubs continue to be as vocal as possible against B teams being in the Lowland League rather than seeing it as the lesser of two evils. B teams shouldn't be in the Lowland League in the first place and, as long as they are there, the threat will remain of Conference League type ideas. The SFA etc are there to serve Rangers and Celtic and no-one else and clubs need to fight this as much as possible.
0 -
22 hours ago, Burnieman said:
No only clubs at tier 5 or above, plus clubs who were members before 2018, plus associations like SWPL, SJFA, EoSFA etc.
I still can't believe that they're giving extra rights to the teams who were members before 2018 rather than making it equal for all licensed teams. I say I can't believe but it is Scottish football...
3 -
32 minutes ago, Dev said:
There's been mention of Troon, Renton, Blairgowrie and Carluke Rovers on other threads. Petershill and Dyce cannot be too far off. However, we shall see.
Renton?
0 -
1 hour ago, Ginaro said:
So compared to this season it's going to be +Abbey Vale, Beith, Creetown, Culter, Glenafton and -Syngenta for a net gain of 4=130?
Plus some newly licensed clubs.
0 -
Did the EoS not reject Syngenta originally as well hence they joined the juniors?
2 -
1 hour ago, Burnieman said:
To be honest, he's probably only saying that because Hibs are against it. The article would have a lot more power had Hibs been in the Lowland League and he was still speaking out against B teams (I highly doubt he would be saying anything against it in that case). We need more important people than Tam McManus saying something although I suppose every article against it helps.
1 -
The original decision to let the Old Firm B teams in a couple of years ago was much more significant than the Lowland League portrayed it at the time and it has opened up a whole new set of events.
1) By voting to let the Old Firm B teams in, they legitimised the concept of having B teams in the pyramid (higher up than the SoS/EoS). As soon as the B teams get in, it becomes more 'accepted'. Every year they're allowed back in, it becomes normal to have B teams in the Lowland League and gives them some power to start arguing for more. It was a terrible decision at the time and I don't think there was anyone on the forum who thought it would be one year only (I don't honestly believe even the Lowland League clubs thought it).
2) The Old Firm B teams must have been delighted when Hearts got accepted too. In reality, this entire thing is simply about getting the Old Firm B teams into the SPFL. That's clearly the long-term goal. You start by getting into the Lowland League and doing well in the league. You then start arguing that you should be able to be promoted/placed higher up. They're gradually overcoming each obstacle until eventually they get into the SPFL somehow. This has nothing to do with Hearts, Aberdeen etc. but Hearts joining helped the Old Firm inadvertently by making them be able to argue that all B teams should be allowed in so it feels like less of an Old Firm vs. the rest argument.
3) I'm not even convinced anyone (including the Old Firm) wants this conference idea. It helped first of all as another terrible argument for the Lowland League accepting the clubs ('it's either they get back into the Lowland League or they set up a new Conference League'). It's all just a stepping stone to them being allowed into the SPFL. Kind of like they're suggesting the worst possible ideas in the hope that the clubs eventually just give in and let them into League Two.
I definitely think the initial decision to allow them into the Lowland League a couple of years ago will end up in them getting into the SPFL one day. I hope I'm wrong but it's been my worry from the start. It's a slippery slope from "one season only" to multiple seasons to non-Old Firm B teams to ridiculous conference ideas to eventually SPFL. They'll probably get in through some expanded SPFL/automatic League Two relegation type deal to bargain with the SPFL and non-league clubs. Basically, they'll tie in Old Firm B sides to something completely unconnected like automatic promotion to League Two (and expanded League Two to help convince smaller SPFL clubs that they'll be able to survive in the league for longer) to get it through and say it's the only way they'll get what they want.
Thoroughly depressing situation. To think that they could actually be looking at non league football and trying to bring in positive changes that almost everyone on here would agree with e.g. 1) automatic relegation spot from League Two and 2) automatic promotion spots from Level 6 but, instead, it all becomes about the Old Firm. It's such a shame because there has been such a huge amount of progress in non-league football and hardly anyone would have believed we'd have a unified system by now had you asked a few years ago about the seniors/juniors merging.
18 -
9 hours ago, Burnieman said:
The LL let the genie out of the bottle and unfortunately it isn't going back. The problem for most isn't B teams (The EoS had Hibs B for a season 10 years ago), it's the fact they're being shoehorned in rather than applying like any other club and starting at the bottom.
If the B teams applied individually to WoS and EoS without the wailing and gnashing of teeth from Maxwell & Co, then they would almost certainly have been accepted, but the OF wanted in at a higher level, and the SFA/LL facilitated that. You won't get rid of them now however much we want them to disappear.
I can't see there ever being more than half-a-dozen B teams, the costs associated with running them rules out most clubs who will stick with U18/U20's. If you had six B teams spread throughout the non-league system west and east then it wouldn't be much of an issue, one team out of 16 doesn't really impact. It's when you have 3 or 4 or 5 all in the same division who didn't earn the right to be there is where the problems start.
The SFA and LL are the two culpable parties for this utter mess of a Conference, with a healthy dose of pot stirring by some L2 Chairmen.
Yes and the lack of possible relegation for the B teams makes it even more ridiculous. To be honest, I'm against the B teams being in the pyramid at all but, if they are going to force them into the system, having them in a league they can't get promoted from or relegated out of makes it a total farce and reduces any of the potential benefits to the players in the B teams. It just seems completely pointless having them in a league that they can't go in and out of and all seems set up so that the Old Firm B teams win it each year until eventually they are allowed into League Two. As shown by the Hearts B team struggling in the Lowland League this year, I doubt there's much capacity for any non-Old Firm B teams to do particularly well (and this is in a Lowland League still far from having all the strongest non-league teams).
5 -
1 hour ago, PELE said:
Yeah, until they have another vote in the future, pushing for the B teams to be free to move up or down the leagues as high as the championship.
A 10-team league with 4 B-teams in it who can't be promoted/relegated meaning you could have a top 4 of B teams and then 5th getting promoted to League Two or a bottom 4 of B teams and 6th getting relegated to the Lowland/Highland League? Also, a 36-game season where the clubs are playing B teams 16 times? I know there's been some awful ideas over the past few years in Scottish football but this one is even worse. What a joy for the Lowland/Highland League champions to get promoted into this dire league...
12
LOWLAND LEAGUE - Strongest it's ever been! What's You View?
in Lowland League
Posted · Edited by stanley
East Stirlingshire have been in the league for seven seasons and last season was, by far, their worst season so I'm not sure about the "having been in this league either a season or a couple of seasons, should now be settled and know what is required to get out of the Lowland League" claim. If anything, it might even get harder for the ex-league teams over the years as the Lowland League gets stronger and they move further away from being an SPFL club.