Suspect Device

Aye cheers, Douglas. Have you got anything to say except SNPbad, indyref2bad and Nicola Sturgeonbad? Does negative campaigning work? Edit: I do like the way they don't give a f**k about Nicola Sturgeon's candidates name. Their advisors obviously think that going for the leader is more likely to hit home with those undecideds.

Saves time.

If it had been a previous leader he would have told them it was God's retribution for the only gay in the village. Probably.

According to urban dictionary it's an absolute complete fucking idiot. Although the melt who wrote it spells it absoulute.

Odds shortening on Tories overall majority to 8/11. 1/12 to win most seats.

Oh Yee of little faith. I wouldn't count your winnings yet...…

Should have passed it to Shay.

Bookies don't payout for an own goal so for us hopefully.

28/1 now. lump on.

This game needs a Shay Logan goal.

Where are you getting that? Bet365 are only offering 10/1. Took it anyway.

Does Kirstene Hair Sound Like A Robot All The Time?

It's all organised mobile phones and the internet these days. What's Italian for where do plastic paddies drink when abroad?

My letter from the Tories hasn't changed my mind. Still SNP for me. I wonder if Labour will put in a bid for my vote by not just talking about the opposition.

That's sarcasm isn't it? I can tell. I read the letters I got at the weekend from Ross Thomson and one today from Douglas Lumsden. Douglas has nothing in his letter about Brexit or the Tory plans for the future of Scotland. In one fucking page, there are no less than 10 references to the referendum, 10 references to the SNP, 6 mentions of Nicola Sturgeon and a massive 0 mentions of Brexit. It does have 11 instances of Scottish Conservatives. So they mention their own party only one more time than they talk about the SNP. That's why both myself and the wife laugh whenever they interview a Tory on the telly who comes out with the pish phrase that the SNP are always banging on about Indyref2 when in actual fact, they are the ones banging on about it.

I'm not on facebook so no, I've never been targeted. On twitter but can't say I've noticed anything.

Not read it yet. Should I bother or wait for the new one with Douglas Lumsden's picture and the same anti indref2 diatribe beside it?

So we're agreed c***s shouldn't get a vote?

I've noticed I've missed out a party standing in my own constituency of Aberdeen South. Renew candidate Colin McFadyen. Not being a political anorak, I'd never heard of them until today.

Was reading a story on marginals at the weekend. I didn't realise how slim the SNP majorities were in some seats. 4 out of the 10 most marginal seats are SNP held. Hard to tell how it's going to go.

Was there not already a (very slow) investigation into it?

Male or female and are you male or female. Also would it make a difference given it's still unwanted sexual advances? Guaranteed it would be perceived differently by the general public. You get touched up by an older woman as a young guy and the consensus would be lucky you. Get touched up by an older guy and the reaction would be different.

Aye, exciting times.

Thought it was sensible because he knows how it works in Scotland. Next 50/50 the rangersplayers and fans scream for a card and the ref obliges. That's game over now anyway.