ayrmad

While an appeal is under consideration I think it is ludicrous to expect teams to play,or does it just mean the appeal is a paper shuffling non-democratic exercise to kid Livi on.

A Ton of virgins.

Long-term downsizing by proxy.

When is the announcement to announce when Livi are making an announcement

No wonder Livi were relegated to the 3rd,a man from Airdrie who took no part in the official decision making process but must have had input,a man from Albion(unless he's moved again) the team that Livi fell out with at the weekend,and a man from a club upto their eyeballs coz they've tried to do things correctly. Nowt like a fair hearing.

Except those that caught you on TV.

He's ugly face,defo more scary.

Match made in heaven.

Don't feel rejected it's only coz he's young and still thinks he's going to pull a stunner for his growing up parade,reality will settle in and he'll realise(probably after a skinful)that it's not bodywork but performance that counts. Edited due to muddling up Inverclyde wankers.

Probably be me talking bollocks I'm renowned for it,don't think there is a points deduction set in stone.

Over-egging it a bit saying 12 clubs but I'll bet there are more than 12 close to the edge. Where do Div 3 teams go if they go into admin?

At least someone can see the woods for the trees. SPL-8 TEAMS DIV 1-6 TEAMS DIV 2-6 TEAMS DIV 3-22 TEAMS League reconstruction by accident.

Brilliant,our economy will rise over the coming months.

You'll just be bringing yourself down to the same level as the morons themselves IMO. It will be coming to a club near you soon of that there is no doubt,I hate Killie to the bottom of my toes(when we are in opposition)but would never wish that on them,in fact I'd be out with the big bucket to raise cash for them,even although my team lost out against them last season no other team could instill the feelings of those 2 games and that's why the sooner we reach Killies level the better. And I'd expect TBC,Findus etc to be of a similar opinion.

The majority will be decent people trying their best. The problem is having cash doesn't always mean you have good judgement,as most entrepeneurs would admit that at some point in the past the had to take massive gambles to get where they are.

That's a fair point,but to gain entry into our footballing bodies owners should be foregoing the right to do as they please,instead being expected to act with more integrity than other businesses.

That's a slur on GG he only wanted to purchase one under an assumed name.

Does he have anyone to share those beds?

Perhaps a small country should not be run by 3 seperate bodies who by all accounts can't work together for the greater good of our game. The problem with accepting the consequences is that I as a fan of club have absolutely no say in wether my club is run by a mature/immature person,as with other clubs the supporters will be there long after the baton holder is gone,the rules should be introduced to protect the clubs of the supporters not to allow anyone with a few bob to do as they like.

Your earlier posts along with this one appear to suggest that it is only some posters using SFL instead of SFA when posting suggestions,why argue then, someone needs to take heed of financial mismanagement,it doesn't matter who so long as someone is doing it. 7. Clubs aiming to live within their means-laudable but means nothing,a % of turnover is required not an aim as an aim depends on chairmen being fiscally prudent taking no account of headbangers,dreamers etc.

I haven't posted anything that suggest actions should be taken unless it arrives in court,Massone repeatedly ended up in court and repeatedly paid staff and players late,no petty gripes.

SD can't come up with suggestions preferring to criticise others attempts,so go ahead you tell us how you'd sort Scottish football.

Why don't you post your suggestions including those that might impinge on your own team,my earlier suggestions would affect my club on at least 2 counts but I still think such rules need introduced b4 we start losing even more clubs. What happens when we start losing teams with cup and title winning history?

You appear to be answering in self-preservation tones. If a debt is outstanding long enough to reach court then that clubs finances should be scrutinised by footballing authorities. If a player receives their wages late more than once then that would suggest a cash-flow problem that should be investigated and help given to help the club rectify the situation b4 it becomes a problem.

While I have no knowledge of SFA/SPL/SFL rules and wether Livi contravened any b4 last week,the MP's for the most part didn't contravene any rules during the expenses farce but morally they were in the wrong as the rules were wrong and made up by themselves for themselves,similar to Scottish football in my opinion. If Scottish football wants to stop running itself on a self-interest basis and introduse rules for everyone based on what's best for our game then why don't they introduce morally justifiable rules fit for all? 1.Cap expenditure on players wages to 55-60% of turnover. 2.For clubs that have already spent outwith their means to gain an unfair advantage in the past all interest payments due to creditors should be deducted from the above 55-60%. 3.Governing bodies should be able to intervene and gain access to a clubs accounts if for example a club are taken to court for late or non-payment of bills. 4.Governing bodies should be able to gain access to a clubs accounts if players or other staff are not paid on time on more than 1 occasion. 5.Clubs should not be allowed to survive on soft loans,anyone wishing to invest money in a club should receive shares to the value of their investment. 6.Pre-defined penalties should be introduced for entering Administration etc. There are many more rules that can be put in place,those above would certainly sort out some of the shit that is happening in our football at the moment.