Jump to content

Jinky67

Gold Members
  • Posts

    6,483
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jinky67

  1. 4 minutes ago, Snifter Pee Rot said:

     

    It would also have chopped off both their goals and given us a penalty. 

    Kyogo was easily a yard onside for the 1st goal and VAR wouldn’t have looked at an innocuous tackle inside Celtics half unless it merited a red card as it isn’t a clear and obvious error however if you can’t defend a free kick taken from inside the other teams half the you deserve to lose.

    Also if Hanlon hadn’t scudded the ball over from 8 yards when it was almost impossible to miss you wouldn’t be crying about not getting the chance to score from 12.

    GIRFUY

  2. 26 minutes ago, virginton said:

    The change of direction principle specifically applies to a braking zone. A straight is not a braking zone. 

    If Verstappen is moving from left to right then Saint Lewis could just move in a straight line and use both his superior momentum and engine power to close instead. That he couldn't execute a move because his tyres were duff is not someone else's fault. 

    Actually it doesn’t or drivers wouldn’t get black and white flagged for weaving on straights, once in a braking zone you aren’t allowed to move at all to defend

     

  3. 21 minutes ago, virginton said:

    Saint Lewis and his divine right to a tow along the straight. I've heard it all now. 

    He doesn’t have a devine right to anything other than the right to expect the driver he is following to make only one change of direction and not three.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...