DukDukGoose

I've always thought it's a bit crazy that managers are fined etc for answering leading questions. That said rules are rules.

Exactly.

You have to admire the old firm fans on any notable post regarding McKenna. Going out of their way to let everyone know how shit the boy is. Strange behaviour.

Goodbye sweet prince.

Presume he's back because he doesn't need to pay child maintenance now?

That navy thing? Not a patch on their away strip from last year.

To annoy you so much that you buy redtv so.you never have to watch them again.

You're probably biased. I am too.

That's a fair shout regarding the full backs.

Papers were saying none of it goes towards a replacement as we signed McCrorie knowing McKenna would be off.

So... McKenna will plug the financial gap and leave us in as good a financial position as we can possibly be all things considered. Based on what we saw yesterday would you be happy going forward with what we have? Would you entertain selling Cosgrove too and getting in a defender who can also play out from the back more comfortably than what we have? We'd be selling our only real goal scorer but playing the 3-4-3 without him it looked like goals could come from anywhere. Having enjoyed the football against Hibs, Killie and Viking my heart says yes but the pragmatic in me thinks we should keep Cosgrove and see if we can squeeze him in. Even if this does mean hoofball.

Let's no wildly exaggerate on the back of a terrible performance. Campbell was brilliant yesterday but he's had some anonymous performances against us over the past couple of years. One where his namesake Dean had him chasing shadows at Pittodrie springs to mind.

The lad must have been chuffed to be told he could miss the game. Changed days from his captain bullying him in to taking injections to play.

Yip. Taylor and Considine both too slow and ponderous on the ball and want an extra touch. You can get away with one of them but not two.

His first game in midfield was against you guys. The previous games he was RCB.

Why does everyone keep claiming McCrorie played RB? He was right of a back three. The same position he played in his first three games.

Viking Stavanger on Thursday. The rest have been on TV. Is that the answer you were looking for?

So three at the back is out the window if Consi and Taylor are both starting...

Don't watch it then.

Poor stuff. Motherwell more than worth the win and didn't have to work too hard for any of them. Got the three early goals and soaked up pretty much everything we threw at it. Made us chase the game. Hopefully players had an eye on Thursday as that wasn't good enough today.

At least in that game we were a bit unlucky. A few crazy goals and we had several crosses that rolled along the goal line with no takers. Could play another 90 and create nothing here.

Edmondson, Hoban and Logan have made a difference. Crazy to suggest otherwise. He's a fanny. Trying to get fellow pros sent off while 3-0 up.