Jump to content

FalkirkBairn2021

Gold Members
  • Posts

    1,345
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FalkirkBairn2021

  1. 5 minutes ago, bridge of allan bairn said:

    thing is a lot of this isn't hindsight. fans didn't want Holt, players like wilson fans, including myself and others said were nowhere near good enough before they were signed, these 2 or 3 year contracts are fair enough if the guys being signed are brilliant but for jobbers why did we do it? then sheerins bizarre selections and interviews for months now. the treatment of fans by the board.  its one very poor decision after another. I take my hat off to those investing but I won't be even thinking about going to a game never mind investing until Holt and sheerin are gone and the new board give some form of better strategic statement and say no1 priority going forward will be the lifeblood of the club, the fans. treating arrogant people like Holt better than fans really gets my goat

    Yep.. it isn't about today. I genuinely believe that. It's about 16th October.. when we were bodied by Airdrie. That's the point when Sheerin should have been sacked. 

    Every fixture after that point has been a complete and utter waste of an opportunity.

  2. 5 minutes ago, 18BAIRN76 said:

    Falkirk TV post-match interview: Well, Paul, first and foremost. I thought - with all due respect to Queens Park - we were a little hard done by today. What's your thoughts on today's game?

    'Paul, it's always tough coming to places like this.. but after the 5th goal went in, I thought we were unlucky not to get a consolation'

  3. Just now, Bigbri Bairn said:

    we are bad and looking at the bench gives me the fear. Wonder if the players can produce more under a new manager or are they all really that bad?

    Bit of both. They're terrible but given that we don't have an actual manager,  you'd assume someone barely competent could get 10 more points a season from them. 

  4. 58 minutes ago, Believe The Hype said:

    Holt first 100% he does f**k all and wouldn't need replaced. Stinking the place out from the moment he came in. Also comes across extremely arrogant from what I've seen. Would like to know exactly how much involvement he has in first team affairs. 

    Holt leaving makes zero difference to the fucking shite Sheerin forces on us every week 

     

  5. 10 minutes ago, Shadwell Dog said:

    Colborne at least has held his hands up and stepped down what's happening with the clown prince of pr? Surely after the abusive messages scandle his position is no longer tenable and I haven't seen any mention of him stepping down unless I missed it.

    Forgot about him. I think I'd amend my list to McFarlane, Sheerin and Holt. In that order.

  6. 8 minutes ago, Kircer bairn said:

    Put him on gardening leave - he can then look after the Gnomes as well as the Cones 

    A lot of clubs do this and the deal is normally that we stop paying Sheerin when he finds another job.

    Pretty sure Celtic did that with Gordon Strachan. Or maybe Martin O'Neil. 

     

  7. 3 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said:

    I am no fan of what has happened in the last year. In fact having being involved in the NB offer in the summer I have, IMO, every right to be really angry about how that turned out especially as to where we are now. 
    However I was in a meeting where the Rawlins and around 15-20 others were there two days after the Q&A where the model we now see evolving was discussed and in principle agreed. At that meeting the Patrons present made it clear that the Q&A would make it difficult to raise funds without Boardroom change. At that point Gordon Colburn held up his hands and said IF he was a blockage to investment he would step aside. (There were 2 or 3 others there who post on here can verify that)

    I personally thought it showed he had the interests of the club before his own personal ambition. For that alone I respected him for saying that. 

    The new set up is not perfect, it has one or two flaws but without sounding like a broken record we have to move forward now and try and pull together. 

    I do find it difficult to criticise someone putting substantial money into the club - I could afford to do so too, but absolutely wouldn't, so perhaps shouldn't be too negative about Colborn.

    He's just so unlikeable though.

  8. On 02/12/2021 at 17:26, ShaggerG said:

    I take your point but we still need to get the money to do it. I have absolutely no idea if we would have access to the necessary to do it though. 

    This is always a bit of a red herring. You don't need to find a lump sum. We can continue to pay Sheerin his monthly salary (which will be peanuts) whilst telling him never to come within 1 mile of the stadium. 

    If we had a whip round on here we could pay Sheerin for 25 years never to manage us.

  9. 12 minutes ago, JulioBairn said:

    Yeah he obviously has ponied up 10 grand but he nailed his colours to the mast and even when he got a bit of backlash he continued to dig his heels in.

    It begs the question that if Lex Miller, Andy Thompson or Craig Campbell had coughed up enough money would they have been accepted into the scheme? I certainly hope not so why has this guy? Cos he’s a nice guy and he didn’t mean it?

    I’ll say it again, I am behind these initiatives and will be involved but there’s a couple of things disappointing me. The removal of Holt on Tuesday will make up for it tho 🙌🏻

    Think this is an excellent point. Im disappointed that Colborn is part of this group. I think it sends a very negative message - a complete clear out was required and we're not getting that. 

    Obviously some positive signs with a few of the individuals involved being a clear step up from the previous board but an opportunity missed. 

     

×
×
  • Create New...