Rovers_Lad

fair comment the reason behind my comment is our club struggled and still are struggling to build bridges with local/small businesses from many years ago and we weren`t in admin

agree we need pace and drive in our midfield as none of our present midfield match that descripton.ferry although a good footballer would be a step back

rebuilding bridges with the 50+ creditors,local small businesses will take a bit of doing

do you have a link to that? they`ve been doing that all season, giving out inflated attendances

pretty much the point i`m making,why should they? thought that was reserved for mp`s only

travelling expenses? how many folk nowadays get paid travelling expenses to go to work?

correct me if i`m wrong but cowden have joined the list of creditors and any payment would deem them to be preferred creditor.as much as i would like cowden to receive the money they are due and not being party to the other creditors/small businesses why should cowden be singled out whilst ignoring other small creditors?

see cowden have asked jackson to settle the £4200 debt relating to gate money dunfermline owe them.club spokesman "we have sent in a claim to the adminstrator and we hope this will be honoured" have dunfermline been given any sanction from the SFL for this non payment or is it incorporated into the 15 point decduction penalty?

in all honesty,hadnt a scooby who he was or is you couldnt be further from the truth. ffs,a tad poor spelling admittedly and apologise for not being so as articulate as yourself

at least be man enough and pop over to fantalk and tell him using your real name instead of hiding behind a sudonym here?

aware a mystery donater paid cowdenbeath £500 and doff my cap to him and of the 50 fans that attended the cowden game(poor turnout no?) why is this controlled by jackson?i thought bucket collections along with raffles,auctions,concerts,bag packing at asdas was organised and carried out by the ordinary supporters? are there any donations seeing there way to hamilton or just cowdenbeath?

just? baw and other foot springs to mind you should be embarrassed some of the 20k raised by bucket collections over the last week should see its way to fellow clubs like cowdenbeath and hamilton who you have stolen from

no and correct

maybe the could see some of their creditors right now

fair comments. was he not owed something like 25k which a fair portion was repaid on his resignation

if a CVA is agreed and with him being the major creditor you`d have to think some of the monies raised will go in mastertons hipper theres no doubting Leish`s is dunfermline through and through but he sat on the board whilst the debt accrued,could he have not done something then?how much of the money owed to him did he recieve when he resigned not too long ago?

". you`d think any hidden skeletons in the cupboards and drawers of East End park would have surfaced by now and they`d have an idea if there was more debt than intially announced is it not better to handover 134k even without a sustainable long term future as opposed to liquidation?could buy a bit more time to put a package in place

another one from along the road thats genuinely sorry although i still feel a deal will be brokered at the 11th hour. the fat lady hasn`t sung yet if not,a sad day for football and fife

something like,the loan received from a bank majority owned by the tax payer dunfermline supporters may have the answer but is it not the case that the loan Masterton took out for the stadium gets called back in by the bank if he doesn't own the club or a own a large percentage

have the pars not got a poor history already with HMRC on time to pay deals?suspect HMRC might want the whole lot,also suspect the pars will find the money to stave off any admin/liquidation if they are owed over £750 is it not?

did masterton set up another company in february and what the reasoning? Oops..Tonsilitis beat me to it

"He is owed money from the pars though so it's swings and roundabouts." he demanded and was given a fair wedge of that when he resigned allegedly

said much the same a few days ago " could big Leish not be seen to be putting himself across as the good guy in this by fronting a new board or whatever when in fact hes sat on the board and whilst dunfermlines debts accumulated?"

could big Leish not be seen to be putting himself across as the good guy in this by fronting a new board or whatever when in fact hes sat on the board and whilst dunfermlines debts accumulated?

not once but twice