Bula Bairn Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Fairest way would be to give tickets to Hospitality, BFL, FSS and Patrons. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Would they not have been better basing the crowd allowed in on the size of the stadium? I mean 500 at some grounds is quite a crowd whilst at others it means there's huge areas with noone in them. Seems a bit ott to limit it to 500 whether it's Anna or the old firm. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerthewitness Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 42 minutes ago, Shadwell Dog said: Would they not have been better basing the crowd allowed in on the size of the stadium? I mean 500 at some grounds is quite a crowd whilst at others it means there's huge areas with noone in them. Seems a bit ott to limit it to 500 whether it's Anna or the old firm. I think she mentioned something about fans travelling to games together/gathering in pubs (despite producing no fucking evidence whatsoever to back this up). -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 6 minutes ago, badgerthewitness said: I think she mentioned something about fans travelling to games together/gathering in pubs (despite producing no fucking evidence whatsoever to back this up). Surely you just ban away fans. And the restrictions in pubs will prevent fans gathering in big numbers anyway as it must be table service for alcohol. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1876 ffc Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Just Nicola kicking football and making sure Celtic don’t have a crowd for the OF game. Good that she’s not transparent! -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FFC1965 Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Whole thing stinks. No risk in using vaccine passports to have a capacity of 25% of capacity min 500. She really hates football. Watch the restrictions get lifted for the Six Nations - you can guarantee that Murrayfield will have 70,000 piss drinkers there on 5th February. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1876 ffc Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Just now, FFC1965 said: Whole thing stinks. No risk in using vaccine passports to have a capacity of 25% of capacity min 500. She really hates football. Watch the restrictions get lifted for the Six Nations - you can guarantee that Murrayfield will have 70,000 piss drinkers there on 5th February. She’s fecking despicable -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Kinnear Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Is this DPB’s Tory loving offspring taking over our thread. Politics page for anti-SNP bias please. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 (edited) 15 minutes ago, FFC1965 said: Whole thing stinks. No risk in using vaccine passports to have a capacity of 25% of capacity min 500. She really hates football. Watch the restrictions get lifted for the Six Nations - you can guarantee that Murrayfield will have 70,000 piss drinkers there on 5th February. Yeah how is it okay to have thousands of people traipsing round the likes of silverburn and Buchanan galleries and the st james quarter etc inside on boxing Day but only 500 folk can sit in the open air at a football match. It just makes absolutely no sense at all. Edited December 21, 2021 by Shadwell Dog 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silvio Tattiescone Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 (edited) 500 people total 2 squads + coaches, kitmen, physios, various hangers on with sports science degrees, officials - 50 or 60 people Youth teams, coaches etc - 50-60? 2 boards, major shareholders and mates - maybe 20-30 Player's family, friends, say 3 each - 120 Stadium staff - 20? Agents, other football hangers on - 20 FTV - 3 Photographers - 4 That's 300+ there without a single ticket being bought. And Andy fucking Thomson Edited December 21, 2021 by Newbornbairn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Is this DPB’s Tory loving offspring taking over our thread. Politics page for anti-SNP bias please.Na. There is a covid thread where spleens can be vented but you are way off here. Criticising this bollocks isn't anti SNP bias in the slightest. Its calling bullshit out for what it is, and claiming that calling out the SNP is somehow pro Tory is gaslighting nonsense. 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbri Bairn Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Don't like this move as it seems a token gesture. The virus is mostly spread in closed poorly ventilated areas the science shows. why leave shops open but limit stadia ? I am well aware that the +ive rate is soaring and in the NHS sickness is getting beyond a joke but surely it makes more sense to allow open air events no matter the crowd 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_bairn Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Don't like this move as it seems a token gesture. The virus is mostly spread in closed poorly ventilated areas the science shows. why leave shops open but limit stadia ? I am well aware that the +ive rate is soaring and in the NHS sickness is getting beyond a joke but surely it makes more sense to allow open air events no matter the crowdFair point. And of course pubs will still be packed out watching games on TV. However it’s pretty obvious that the view here is to balance public protections against the economy, whether you believe that’s fair or otherwise…. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 5 minutes ago, roman_bairn said: Fair point. And of course pubs will still be packed out watching games on TV. However it’s pretty obvious that the view here is to balance public protections against the economy, whether you believe that’s fair or otherwise…. Will many people go to pubs if you've got to be at a table to drink booze though? Most folk will just get their mates round to the house where there's noone restricting anything and the drinks cheaper id've thought. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Kinnear Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Na. There is a covid thread where spleens can be vented but you are way off here. Criticising this bollocks isn't anti SNP bias in the slightest. Its calling bullshit out for what it is, and claiming that calling out the SNP is somehow pro Tory is gaslighting nonsense. So the “she is despicable” comment isn’t anti-SNP, the she being referred to is the head of an SNP government and leader of the party. Each to their own but to me that’s anti-SNP. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_bairn Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Don't like this move as it seems a token gesture. The virus is mostly spread in closed poorly ventilated areas the science shows. why leave shops open but limit stadia ? I am well aware that the +ive rate is soaring and in the NHS sickness is getting beyond a joke but surely it makes more sense to allow open air events no matter the crowdDo you happen to know whether a more virulent strain like this is much more transmissible outdoors?It was considered very low risk for Delta for example, but I just wondered if there’s any data to suggest it’s a different issue here and that’s why there is more concern for large outdoor events? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 6 minutes ago, Harry Kinnear said: So the “she is despicable” comment isn’t anti-SNP, the she being referred to is the head of an SNP government and leader of the party. Each to their own but to me that’s anti-SNP. There are people who are SNP but not great fans of sturgeon mind you just like any political party. People can agree with the views of the party but not particularly with the person leading it at any one time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 2 minutes ago, roman_bairn said: Do you happen to know whether a more virulent strain like this is much more transmissible outdoors? It was considered very low risk for Delta for example, but I just wondered if there’s any data to suggest it’s a different issue here and that’s why there is more concern for large outdoor events? It's more transmissible on the whole but still far more transmissible indoor than out. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_bairn Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 There are people who are SNP but not great fans of sturgeon mind you just like any political party. People can agree with the views of the party but not particularly with the person leading it at any one time.Yep, I’m one of them.Still doesn’t excuse some of the stupid comments above… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Kinnear Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 There are people who are SNP but not great fans of sturgeon mind you just like any political party. People can agree with the views of the party but not particularly with the person leading it at any one time.Yip I totally agree, I was no great fan of Alex Salmond as a person. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.