The_Kincardine Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 A large number of loans aren't protected. Do you know if this one is? I don't. My guess would be that there's an agreement (formal or otherwise) for it to be converted for shares in the future. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Could some mod kindly ban this tedious wee troll? You dug shull up yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Will there be any shares left to raise funds, once all these loans have been converted? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nakamura Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Yesterday, King said it was “practically feasible and legally feasible” to rehabilitate the oldco. The South Africa-based tycoon added: “I would like to see us taking oldco out of liquidation and putting assets back into oldco. “It would be a good thing to do. It would be back to the traditional Rangers. “I think the supporters would like it.” Remember this? Even the lifelong Rangers fan that runs the club believes that this is not the old club. This is not the company he's talking about here, why would King resurrect the company that Whyte/ Duff & Phelps ran into the ground?. It's Dave King, he says whatever some supporters want to hear. Probably f**k all to do with what Dave King 'believes', I doubt he truly concerns himself with such problems in the first place. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 You want someone banned for irritating you by telling the truth? That is a bit pathetic mate. Sounds Rangers fans with Phil. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 You want someone banned for irritating you by telling the truth? . Isn't that what you got banned for? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Could some mod kindly ban this tedious wee troll? Why should FB be banned exactly? Is it just because you don't agree with his way of thinking? More power to FB, that's what i think. Should i be banned as well because of that? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Why should FB be banned exactly? Is it just because you don't agree with his way of thinking? More power to FB, that's what i think. Should i be banned as well because of that? Don't give them ideas, man! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Don't give them ideas, man! Very good, JG. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Why should FB be banned exactly? Is it just because you don't agree with his way of thinking? More power to FB, that's what i think. Should i be banned as well because of that? Hell, yeah. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BinoBalls Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Why should FB be banned exactly? Is it just because you don't agree with his way of thinking? More power to FB, that's what i think. Should i be banned as well because of that? Because he's trolling. Badly. Every day. Hence my use of the word "troll". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BinoBalls Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 You want someone banned for irritating you by telling the truth? That is a bit pathetic mate. No "mate" I just can't be bothered with endless "54 titles! WATP" pish that adds nothing. I could spam the thread by saying "today is Sunday" over and and over. That would be truthful. It also would be trolling. I'm surprised you can't tell the difference. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 No "mate" I just can't be bothered with endless "54 titles! WATP" pish that adds nothing. I could spam the thread by saying "today is Sunday" over and and over. That would be truthful. It also would be trolling. I'm surprised you can't tell the difference. Only once a week, though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Because he's trolling. Badly. Every day. Hence my use of the word "troll". Again have you dig up shull yet or ever ? Untill then keep your bitter tears and tantrums to yourself 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Also 54 and counting We welcome the chase 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 No "mate" I just can't be bothered with endless "54 titles! WATP" pish that adds nothing. I could spam the thread by saying "today is Sunday" over and and over. That would be truthful. It also would be trolling. I'm surprised you can't tell the difference. Glad that your problem with '54 titles' is its constant repetition rather than its veracity. That's you and John Collins acknowledging our continuity in the same day -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Listen 'mate' the 'yer deid' patter is also endless, FB has just come up with a simple, truthful and very effective counter to it, I am sure you will agree. I agree that "yer died" is no more entertaining than "54 titles". How about if we do away with both? Would it kill the BRALT? Possibly, sadly. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted January 10, 2016 Share Posted January 10, 2016 No "mate" I just can't be bothered with endless "54 titles! WATP" pish that adds nothing. I could spam the thread by saying "today is Sunday" over and and over. That would be truthful. It also would be trolling. I'm surprised you can't tell the difference. Or you could just put him on ignore. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paramour Posted January 11, 2016 Share Posted January 11, 2016 Glad that your problem with '54 titles' is its constant repetition rather than its veracity. That's you and John Collins acknowledging our continuity in the same day Ah yes, taking legal authority from John 'Abs' Collins. If that's not grasping for straws I'm not sure what is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted January 11, 2016 Share Posted January 11, 2016 Glad that your problem with '54 titles' is its constant repetition rather than its veracity. That's you and John Collins acknowledging our continuity in the same day ' veracity'?? 'continuity'?? In any other circumstance except the Rangers / The Rangers saga, the 54 would have been reduced by 5 or 6 EBT assisted titles. The 'and counting' part is also wrong as that original club is being liquidated - no matter how much of a pretence is put up otherwise. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.