Monkey Tennis Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 The one actual punishment for the biggest disgrace in Scottish football history and they still haven't settled up. I think Bennet asked why he should view sevco as a new club. Pretty simple really, any ordinary human being would be ashamed of Rangers and would want to distance themselves from such a disgrace. Ordinary human beings, I know. It is amazing that you simply don't seem to get any Rangers voices saying "Come on lads. Let's do the right thing here." On that FF thread, one or two say to pay up and move on, but nobody seems to think that doing so should be done because it's right and that they've actually been let off very lightly for the greatest footballing offence in Scottish history. It only makes sense when you remember why so many of them support a club like that in the first place. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 What point are you making here Bennett? I don't really get what you mean. I think you do. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 And only 3 days ago in their accounts... TRFCL also notes proceedings raised by the SPL in 2012 against The Rangers Football Club Plc (Oldco) relating to the use of employee benefit trusts (EBTs) led to a £250,000 fine being levied against Oldco in 2013 plus costs of £150,000. The company notes: “As part of the agreement to allow Rangers to participate in Scottish football, there was a clause inserted where it was agreed that Rangers would become liable and responsible for the imposition of any sanctions by the SPL or any breach of rules and or articles by Oldco/Rangers FC (ie. The £250,000 fine). “The club believes that the SPFL has, through documents and actions, waived all and any rights it may have had to insist upon repayment under the clause, thereby holding the club harmless in relation to the sanctions. “This is disputed by the SPFL.†TRFCL notes it is seeking an Arbitral Tribunal ruling on the issue, and if it loses the case, will be liable for the fine, plus interest and costs. The tribunal sat on October 29 and 30 of last year to consider the matter, though a final ruling has yet to be announced. Lol 400k Hmmm. I wonder what the company thinks about it though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 I think you do. Honestly, I don't. Please explain it, or don't. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 That's because he wants you to read his blog... Is he the gate keeper of the blog... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 Key master. Key Grand Master? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddy Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 Are they deid yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 Feel sorry for the Sun journo who in preparation for a 'Lee Wallace wants to be a Legend' sycophant piece, shopped Wallace onto the Gregg statue. Not going down well I hear 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanderlei Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 (edited) Funny how the Ps&Ds frown on us bears laughing at the bloggers, yet post links laughing at Rangers forums.. Edited March 26, 2016 by Vanderlei 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 Funny how the Ps&Ds frown on us bears laughing at the bloggers, yet post links laughing at Rangers forums.. 'Frown'? We rely on you keeping us up to date on what the bloggers are saying. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 Funny how the Ps&Ds frown on us bears laughing at the bloggers, yet post links laughing at Rangers forums.. Cos bloggers are all wankers but Rangers forums are full of Rangers fans..also wankers? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanderlei Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 Shame on you wunfy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 (edited) Wunfy, BossHogg and whosoever dreadful alias 'Thor' is making a c**t of themselves. On The Big Thread. Again. Silence, of course, from Knotty Ash. Edited March 26, 2016 by The_Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 URL is from where bearz? Check it. And all I said was it wasn't going down well, which you two nuggets prove.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 This thread no deed yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 (edited) They take the verdict well on the swamp.. Were I so unfortunate as to be a diddy I'd be raging that this bill was given to Sevco. This is because I can do joined-up thinking. Edited March 27, 2016 by The_Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 Were I so unfortunate as to be a diddy I'd be raging that this bill was given to Sevco. This is because I can do joined-up thinking. Quite right. I'd have preferred your new club to have to have gone through the proper process to gain league admittance. That said, given the agreements made your club should pay the fine. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 Were I so unfortunate as to be a diddy I'd be raging that this bill was given to Sevco. This is because I can do joined-up thinking. It was one of the conditions of the new club being preferentially placed in the 4th tier. Pretty simple stuff kinky. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 Scottish society run by the church of Rome What a paranoid mess 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 It was one of the conditions of the new club being preferentially placed in the 4th tier. Pretty simple stuff kinky. Absolutely. He's tried this nonsense before, apparently under the impression that it's clever. When another administration looked likely, he thought it was some kind of trump card to suggest that we'd all be pressing for the points penalty to reflect a first offence. It truly is the logic of the playground, at a kindergarten, ignoring that those responsible for issuing penalties or collecting fines regard this as the same club. Why on earth would we want Rangers to get the best of both worlds? I actually think he's a great deal less intelligent than he does. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.