sjc Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Tache another one who squandered the Christmas fund on resolution 12 #prayfordiddies Serious question FB - Would you not want a corrupt Governing body forced to reform? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Which governing body is corrupt? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Serious question FB - Would you not want a corrupt Governing body forced to reform? We all know the answer to that one... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Which governing body is corrupt? The SFA. You did read the report, bennett? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Serious question FB - Would you not want a corrupt Governing body forced to reform? Not a capital 'R' so unlikely. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 The SFA. You did read the report, bennett? What have they done to deserve being called corrupt? -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 What have they done to deserve being called corrupt? are you being deliberately obtuse or do you wish for a race to the bottom*? *no pun intended 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 What have they done to deserve being called corrupt? They tried to impose illegal punishments against rangers (rip), rather than just expelling/putting them down which Craig Whyte et al righteously and in complete contravention of the articles of association, successfully challenged in court. Oh and they ignored the bit where the scum were caught red-handed lying to HMRC about the Discount Option Scheme side letters in the LNS enquiry. But, you know these things. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 are you being deliberately obtuse or do you wish for a race to the bottom*? *no pun intended Just wondering what they had done to justify being called corrupt. Surely it isn't because of the report (not a blog) which was funded by the Rangers fitba monitor ... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Just wondering what they had done to justify being called corrupt. Surely it isn't because of the report (not a blog) which was funded by the Rangers fitba monitor ... The tax justice network is independent, bennett. You do realise that the report criticised the SFA not Rangers don't you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Still not telling me why the SFA are corrupt? Just pish about an 'independent' blog with an important sounding name. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Still not telling me why the SFA are corrupt? Just pish about an 'independent' blog with an important sounding name. http://www.theoffshoregame.net/475-2/ Read it for yourself bennett. unless you're saying that it's a race to the bottom as to who can cheat their way to the top..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 (edited) Actually, I spent mine on football tops with stars on them. Stars awarded for the greatest European achievements in Scottish football history. What top with imaginary magic stars on it will you collecting your grandkids and bru money in this season? UEFA do not now and have not ever awarded stars for European competition. Aberdeen's self awarded stars are as imaginary and magical as Rangers'. Edited June 22, 2016 by stonedsailor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 B B B B B but his tanks are parked on the lawn and he's a general...... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 As if he cares about paying legal fees. From King/Rangers' point of view, it's money they had to pay out earlier that they're now getting back - there's no profit in there... Oh, wait. It's King we're discussing here. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 As if he cares about paying legal fees. It's the morality... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Anyway, how are the shirt sales and sponsorship deals going since the career criminal landed the knockout blow and defeated Mike Ashley. You seemed to sidestep the question? So shirt sales and some new sponsorship deals .. any news? You're doing the diddy thing of asking a question that you know the answer to. We had the same thing with Wunfy employing the same brain-dead tactic. He, of course, got hauners from 'the usuals'. Interesting to see who will back you up here. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 (edited) Expenses - lunch bills, ffs dhen, i am sure that will be consolation for Mike after paying out many thousands on legal fees for the SFA and Dave King. Any word on yon resolution 12 thingy? By Kinky's roolz, this makes you a diddy.Oh, and brain dead. Edited June 23, 2016 by Shades75 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 By Kinky's roolz, this makes you a diddy. Oh, and brain dead. If it's The Bears it's rhetoric (and the 'h' belongs in that word) and if it's The Diddies it's blind ignorance and, possibly, goading. Simple. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 "There was however a motion for non court expenses , solicitor client expenses to be awarded to Mr King and the SFA. That was refused for the reasons given in Para 37." "The expenses of instructing solicitor , Counsel and where applicable Senior Counsel fall to be met by each party." No doubt Dave King will let the fans know how much he billed Sevco for his "lunch". So shirt sales and some new sponsorship deals .. any news? Tsk, You win your case, but still incur hefty expenses... That seems rather unfair... A bit reminiscent of the unfairness of competing against a company who imperfectly register their entire squad for 10 years.. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.