pozbaird Posted March 31, 2012 Author Share Posted March 31, 2012 (edited) I don't rate Doncaster or Regan at all, but as per' above - why on earth would Regan fabricate a story about what happened at that meeting. Makes no sense whatsoever. Edited March 31, 2012 by pozbaird 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 I didn't expect such an outcome when I seen them on the way to meeting Regan. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky88 Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 As far as I can work out from the reports in the newspapers and from Rangers Media (I presume how the rangers posters know about the fans version of events) there is little to suggest that the idea of Regan being biased against the club was not brought up at the meeting. I wouldn't blame him for leaving if that was the case. You can't reason with people that steadfastly believe that opinion, wrongly. The idea that anyone in the media or spl is biased AGAINST rangers is laughable. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 The fans concerned don't accept Regan's account of the meeting. Yeah the level headed fans of RST ,, :lol: ,,,,, 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 (edited) I don't rate Doncaster or Regan at all, but as per' above - why on earth would Regan fabricate a story about what happened at that meeting. Makes no sense whatsoever. Regan is a football politician. Do you think politicians (and others for that matter) never tell porkies, exaggerate, distort, or spin events to suit their own point of view? Edited March 31, 2012 by Bearwithme 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 Regan is a football politician. Do you think politicians (and others for that matter) never tell porkies, exaggerate, distort, or spin events to suit their own point of view? I no bother,,,he agreed to have a meeting so he could walk out ,,and accuse them of calling him biased against rangers,,a master stroke . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 (edited) Regan is a football politician. Do you think politicians (and others for that matter) never tell porkies, exaggerate, distort, or spin events to suit their own point of view? Seriously mate, this is the type of attitude that might just have an outside chance of killing your club. The balance of probabilities would very, very strongly point to the fact that some of the Rangers support behaved irresponsibly, (quite possibly, very offensively) at the meeting. To not accept that is frankly, ridiculous. Now, regardless of my views of the SFA hierarchy, if I thought I'd been represented in such a way at a crunch time like this, I'd be furious at those responsible. Instead, you conjure up the idea that your club is being treated unfairly and that the wrongdoing lies with the SFA. Seriously, if you want your club to come through this, you really need to grow up collectively. I hope you don't for two reasons though: A) This is so fucking funny. B) It might just help kill your club. Edited March 31, 2012 by Monkey Tennis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 I see SFA chief Stuart Regan walked out of a meeting at Hampden with Rangers supporters groups yesterday, after they started abusing him and accusing him of being a Celtic Fan... :lol: http://www.dailyreco...86908-23807869/ It really does beggar belief that the entire Rangers support - which number hundreds of thousands - cannot by the sounds of it produce even a handful of intelligent, balanced, reasoned individuals, to discuss things with the SFA CEO, without it ending acrimoniously. All they've succeeded in doing is embarrassing themselves further, and presumably further irritating and angering Regan himself. Still, Scottish football's a weird beast, fan-wise. Rangers think everyone's biased against them in Celtic's favour. Celtic think everyone's biased against them in Rangers's favour. And the rest think everyone's biased against them in both's favour. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky88 Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 Regan is a football politician. Do you think politicians (and others for that matter) never tell porkies, exaggerate, distort, or spin events to suit their own point of view? I wouldn't give Regan anywhere near that amount of credit. Let's be clear about this. Regan doesn't come out of this looking well - even if you take the sfa's version of events. The SFA's statement, however, makes the top of the RST look like retards, who wasted an opportunity to have a civil discussion with the head of the SFA (an opportunity other clubs' supporters groups would kill for - i hasten to add) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 Seriously mate, this is the type of attitude that might just have an outside chance of killing your club. The balance of probabilities would very, very strongly point to the fact that some of the Rangers support behaved irresponsibly, (quite possibly, very offensively) at the meeting. To not accept that is frankly, ridiculous. Now, regardless of my views of the SFA hierarchy, if I thought I'd been represented in such a way at a cruch time like this, I'd be furious at those responsible. Instead, you conjure up the idea that your club is being treated unfairly and that the wrongdoing lies with the SFA. Seriously, if you want your club to come through this, you really need to grow up collectively. I hope you don't for two reasons though: A) This is so fucking funny. B) It might just help kill your club. Don't get upset mate, he's a moron, the type of rangers fan who pretends to be above it all and fair minded but is absolutely blind to retarded bigoted behaviour by his clubs so called "fans representatives " And descent football fan would be like,,,,ffs who are these fukin idiots making things worse? But no...The SFA are liars and made it all up... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted March 31, 2012 Author Share Posted March 31, 2012 Regan is a football politician. Do you think politicians (and others for that matter) never tell porkies, exaggerate, distort, or spin events to suit their own point of view? Simply put. If I have to plump between Regan and a bunch of Rangers fans.... Regan wins. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 I wouldn't give Regan anywhere near that amount of credit. Let's be clear about this. Regan doesn't come out of this looking well - even if you take the sfa's version of events. The SFA's statement, however, makes the top of the RST look like retards, who wasted an opportunity to have a civil discussion with the head of the SFA (an opportunity other clubs' supporters groups would kill for - i hasten to add) None of us were at the meeting of course. Maybe, like so often, the truth lies somewhere in between the two accounts. Things got a bit heated. The fans were unhappy that Regan left. He felt he had to hit back.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 None of us were at the meeting of course. Maybe, like so often, the truth lies somewhere in between the two accounts. Things got a bit heated. The fans were unhappy that Regan left. He felt he had to hit back.... You keep believing that pal. It seems to suit you to do so - it certainly suits the rest of us that you all do that too. Absolute bloody idiots. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky88 Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 None of us were at the meeting of course. Maybe, like so often, the truth lies somewhere in between the two accounts. Things got a bit heated. The fans were unhappy that Regan left. He felt he had to hit back.... Ah alright. So does that mean that I could make up an alternative account to any event in history, compare it to the recognised account of what happened and say the truth is somewhere between the two? I merely focused in on the similarity between the 2 accounts - that bias was brought up. I honestly wouldn't care so much about this but there are loads of issues that the sfa should be brought to account on - if they are going to be subjected to idiotic, baseless comments (calling them biased comes under this) then they won't meet the fans at all. The fans will become more divorced from the decision making process. Then we all suffer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p&b is a disgrace Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 How dare the Rangers fans ask Stewart Regan what the SFA have done to help out a member club which is currently being asset stripped. Translated to - How dare the SFA not pull out all the stops to help one club thats cheated its way to the top of the pile at the expense of every other club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordHawHaw Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 I honestly don't see how Rangers can finish the league if the SPL investigation into cheating , even a cursory one would surely see Rangers suspended, anything less makes a mockery of the game 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 I think it is definitely a good idea for Rangers fans to piss off the chief executive of the SFA just now. Can't think of any possible repercussions. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordHawHaw Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 I think it is definitely a good idea for Rangers fans to piss off the chief executive of the SFA just now. Can't think of any possible repercussions. Campbell's got their back as well as their money, EBT's aside 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northsea80 Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 Is the Rangers supporters trust in any way affiliated with the Brain trust from scrubs? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Sensible Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 What other than evidence that could lead to criminal charges? Please explain what criminal charges will be brought. I'd like a good laugh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.