Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

How about this scenario

1) SPL clubs vote 'no' to transfer SPL share from oldco to newco

2) SFL clubs vote 'no' to newco entering into division 1

3) oldco gives share back to SPL, pending liquidation

4) SPL has a unoccupied share

5) SPL clubs vote to give the share to newco

Far fetched?

On Radio Shortbread this morning, John Yorkson offered Newco to SPL as a possibility when the SPL meet on Monday to decide who would be Club 12. So, no, definately not far fetched.

He didn't support this option BTW and was very critical about the governing bodies.

There are many twists and turns ahead. Today is not the end, just another milestone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about this scenario

1) SPL clubs vote 'no' to transfer SPL share from oldco to newco

2) SFL clubs vote 'no' to newco entering into division 1

3) oldco gives share back to SPL, pending liquidation

4) SPL has a unoccupied share

5) SPL clubs vote to give the share to newco

Far fetched?

Very far fetched as the first vote today gives Sevco membership of the SFL. Once they are a member there would have to be another vote for them to be allowed to resign. That is why the third vote is needed today as either Dundee or Dunfermline need to resign

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunno if I've missed something but what was Regans leaked email?

It was sent to various people within the heirarchy (and Charles Green) outline the timescale for getting NewCo into Div 1. It has so far fuckin' failed spectacularly

http://blogs.channel4.com/alex-thomsons-view/football-chairmen-living-fairytale-world/2265

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else smelling a rat here?

Is it just possible that this 11th hour development has been introduced in order to lend a degree of legitimacy to a proposal to delay the vote? Dundee could reasonably claim that they haven't been afforded sufficient opportunity to consider the resolutions prior to the vote. Perhaps I'm getting carried away on a wave of cynicism, but I wouldn't put anything past these characters.

In fairness, earlier in the week Clyde FC made the very valid point that they had next to no information about this Sevco Scotland thing there were being asked to vote into the SFL. Given that Dundee FC's 'cop out' specifically stated that the Board were still free to 'debate' if not vote, then Dundee FC's position should have been clear sometime before now. I'm disappointed that we don't have a position sorted out, even if being permitted to vote happened at the last night. Given the circumstances of the situation, I don't think there's time for a postponement. A vote that says "No to Sevco, we don't have enough information" puts the ball back in the SFA/Sevco's court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It hasnt. He's guessing, based on the interviews and announcements from the club and Chairman. There has been no official announcement either way of how Queens are going to vote.

I wish his worries were as groundless as you're making out Mr X. Take a look at the Queens thread on the 2nd Division Board. It links to an interview with Davie Rae in which he says the financial realities mean Rangers have to go to the 1st.

Now I know that Rae's no longer on the board, but he reminds us that he's the majority shareholder and says that Hewitson sees it the same way and he expects us to vote for the 1st division option.

It's not proof positive, but it's a very clear indication of where we're heading and it's disgusting.

Edited by Monkey Tennis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it not on record that the SFA would veto any move to put Rangers in the SPL?

Several clubs have said that was what was said by Regan at the last SFL meeting of all 30 clubs but this was quickly denied by Regan after the meeting.

I know who I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always assumed that an outright "no" to league football for sevco would just result in an existing league club being bought over and rebranded as "Rangers" ASAP - surely nothing to stop that happening?

Do 'they' have the money to do this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Dundee and Dunfermline will be given permission (through resolution iii) to waive the usual two-year notice period for resignation from the SFL today, but neither will actually resign yet. On Monday, the SPL will vote on which of the two are to be invited, and then that club will resign.

What's this? Special treatment for certain clubs? But what about "sporting integrity"? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have we ruled out the possibility of newco being relegated in place of Dunfermline on Monday?

Dunfermline have already been relegated, that's why they're voting today.

Newco can't be relegated because they aren't in the SPL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever else happens, the reputation of football in Scotland has taken a bit of a battering - not IMO because of Rangers, but because of the various numpties who have been most prominent throughout this whole fiasco. Today will determine just how far Scottish football will fall in the worldwide view.

Regardless, Regan and Doncaster have to go!

Edited by ExiledSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...