craigkillie Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 http://forum.rangers. ..pic=231690&st=0 I love that some of them think they can go to England if they aren't SFA members. If that was the case, them and Celtic would have resigned from the SFA and moved to England years ago. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Listened to Talksport for a few minutes there while I was in the car. Durham & Gough genuinely do believe that the entire Scottish game is now facing collapse... 5 top-tier clubs are going to fold... the only reason Rangers weren't kept in SPL / put into SFL1 was due to spite and hate... SFL3 is like public parks... and so on. Oh, and 'Goughy' - it's Berwick, not Bur-weck, you idiot. There on my banned list as well, it's bad enough swatting flies up here without listening to them spouting copied crap that's been discredited days and days ago, radio stations really need to stop choosing a stance just to cause a stir, it's getting tiresome and the thick folk believe them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Invalid Probe Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 STV Sport @STVSportRangers' league place at risk as Scottish FA insist signing ban must stand http://bit.ly/LURX43 Grant Russell @STVGrantRangers won't play in the Third Division, or anywhere, unless Charles Green's company accepts SFA conditions http://bit.ly/LURX43 Expand Reply Retweet Favorite Please let it be so It was Green and as such the new regime that took this to court. I think they are getting off lightly with just one year. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The/Republic Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 The fans of Scottish football have done a wonderful job in applying the pressure to the chairmen of clubs up and down the land. It would be good to see that collective spirit working again to apply some pressure to SKY. Imagine the headlines when the supporters of every club (- the 500 Sevco fans) threatened to cancel subscriptions if SKY pull out of Scottish football . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Oh my goodness. I'm beginning to think (genuinely for the first time) that Rangers are not going to play anywhere at all next season, or potentially ever again. That's some stumbling block... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyle Lanley Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Rangers' league place at risk as Scottish FA insist signing ban must stand http://sport.stv.tv/...ban-must-stand/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meanmistermustard Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 STV Sport @STVSportRangers' league place at risk as Scottish FA insist signing ban must stand http://bit.ly/LURX43 Grant Russell @STVGrantRangers won't play in the Third Division, or anywhere, unless Charles Green's company accepts SFA conditions http://bit.ly/LURX43 Expand Reply Retweet Favorite please let it be so Que 50 minutes of Traynor/Young/Dodds rage and pish. "Its ludicris, punished with 3rd division was plenty, and now this. It has to stop as its getting embarrassing and personal" mixed in with the 180 degree turn "they should always have been put in SFL3, been saying it all along, best thing for the game, never mentioned the game would die" and plenty of repeated mentions of Rangers and their history continuing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyle Lanley Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheikyerbouti Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 That's what I told Robert Johnson, but he wouldn't listen. Granny..Are you telling us you are a fan of the blues? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Tbh, my gut reaction is their academy players + McCulloch would likely win SFL3 anyway, but maybe Green doesn't want to risk it. It still makes no sense how this has occurred though. If Friday's vote had gone the way of SFL1, would this have still happened? If not, then is SFA acting differently than if SFL had played ball - or is it Green? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyle Lanley Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madwullie Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 I thought a condition of this shit on Friday would mean they would have to accept the sanctions? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever Diamond Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 GOAT HALF-TIME, TEA-TIME, BOW-TIME! Group:True Blue Topics:981 Posts:11,473 Rep:329 Joined:05-September 08 Gender:Male Location:the Bow Club Posted Today, 04:43 PM No what. f**k Scotland, they don't want us here, let's get tae f**k. Hallelujah has it now finally sunk in 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 The fans of Scottish football have done a wonderful job in applying the pressure to the chairmen of clubs up and down the land. It would be good to see that collective spirit working again to apply some pressure to SKY. Imagine the headlines when the supporters of every club (- the 500 Sevco fans) threatened to cancel subscriptions if SKY pull out of Scottish football . Already been mentioned on here Someone suggested trying the 'good cop' routine and actually offering Sky advertising space for free to show goodwill. Worth a try before donning the steel toed pit boots. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 16 Jul 2012, 05:39 PM Grant Russell @ STVGrant STV understands the Scottish FA say newco Rangers must accept a 12-month signing ban or they won't give them membership bit.ly/LURX43 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hipster Dufus Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Que 50 minutes of Traynor/Young/Dodds rage and pish. "Its ludicris, punished with 3rd division was plenty, and now this. It has to stop as its getting embarrassing and personal" mixed in with the 180 degree turn "they should always have been put in SFL3, been saying it all along, best thing for the game, never mentioned the game would die" and plenty of repeated mentions of Rangers and their history continuing. Out of greenies, but you are spot on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huckleberry Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Easy one for Green here! The option is accept the initial signing ban rejected by the CoS as being ultra vires or the remaining punishments available which are suspension or expulsion from the SFA. As a businessman I'm sure he will opt for the one that pays the most- a signing ban. So he will save Rangers 2 from oblivion. At the time when Bomber Brown made his speech on the steps of Ibrox there was a rumour that if they were put in sfl3 then Greene was going to flatten Ibrox. I wonder. mmmm 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7-2 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 FFS. This is just Campbell Ogilvie's SFA trying to help their beloved Rangers even more. They tried the signing ban, were told it was illegal and to think again. All they can therefore do is move up their list of actual punishments and do what they should have done in the first place ie suspension. Anything less is a continuation of the old boys act. Plus ca fucking change. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capt_oats Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 If Friday's vote had gone the way of SFL1, would this have still happened? If not, then is SFA acting differently than if SFL had played ball - or is it Green? I think it's Green, I'm more than willing to be corrected but was part of the Regan agreement not along the lines of Green will accept the sanctions if SFL1 happens? Therefore there would have been no dispute. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Tbh, my gut reaction is their academy players + McCulloch would likely win SFL3 anyway, but maybe Green doesn't want to risk it. It still makes no sense how this has occurred though. If Friday's vote had gone the way of SFL1, would this have still happened? If not, then is SFA acting differently than if SFL had played ball - or is it Green? There were mentions to the transfer embargo from various quarters during the SFL1 propaganda-fest. The Daily Express had an article saying that Green was "happy to accept" the 12 month ban, as long as it started in August. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.