wunfellaff Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 (edited) Gio's latest Edited July 25, 2012 by wunfellaff 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 This is beyond a joke now. The SPL said Rangers had a prima facie case to answer, and the BBC lawyers never would have let their documentary air if they had even one ounce of doubt about the content. I think it's fair to surmise that the BBC know a lot more than they aired too. Why are the Scottish football authorities not laying down the law to these chunts. There should be no negotiations, no deals, no bargaining. Who the fcuk do Green and McCoist think they are? Someone in the SPL and SFA, get a grip of this situation. The BBC said they only got a look at the side letters, weren't allowed to take copies. They probably won't reveal sources. And there's all the other linked investigations into EBT's. I think they'll make a firm and rigorous decision not to make a decision. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted July 25, 2012 Author Share Posted July 25, 2012 What's the problem with the oldco being punished? Aren't they two different clubs? Or has that changed now that it doesn't suit the agenda? Eh? You've lost me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CambieBud Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 This is beyond a joke now. The SPL said Rangers had a prima facie case to answer, and the BBC lawyers never would have let their documentary air if they had even one ounce of doubt about the content. I think it's fair to surmise that the BBC know a lot more than they aired too. Why are the Scottish football authorities not laying down the law to these chunts. There should be no negotiations, no deals, no bargaining. Who the fcuk do Green and McCoist think they are? Someone in the SPL and SFA, get a grip of this situation. Spot on Poz, painful to watch from start to finish. Once the dust settles, there must be a complete overhaul of the running of the game. One governing body, ie The SFA and that's it. Far too many vested interests and far too many wee power mad Ayotolahs. One set of rules for every club from amateur to SPL. This whole shambles has shown what a perocial wee country we are. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leepylee Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Eh? You've lost me. Sadly I think I understand what he's getting at but I hope he's not really THAT stupid to think what I think he's thinking 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 This is beyond a joke now. The SPL said Rangers had a prima facie case to answer, and the BBC lawyers never would have let their documentary air if they had even one ounce of doubt about the content. I think it's fair to surmise that the BBC know a lot more than they aired too. Why are the Scottish football authorities not laying down the law to these chunts. There should be no negotiations, no deals, no bargaining. Who the fcuk do Green and McCoist think they are? Someone in the SPL and SFA, get a grip of this situation. For some reason it has all come down to one thing with newco fans & McCoist & Green ! keeping the clubs history and not only that without any punishments either because they are a new club ! but a new club that comes with 140 years worth of history WTF. It would appear to the fans that losing their right to point and say "we are the most successful club team in the world" is way way too much to lose.The loss of boasting and bragging about a so called illustrious 140 year history of the club that they are better and more successful than anyone else is worth threatening executive members of the SFA now.They want to keep their history of the old club whilst insisting they are a new club and also in fact the oldco and the newco are actually the same club ! BUT ! punish us and take away our honours,cups & titles and we will reek havoc. They can't distinguish between a newco & the oldco at the moment and are in denial mode at the loss of a loved one because the clone club breaths. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 What's the problem with the oldco being punished? Aren't they two different clubs? Or has that changed now that it doesn't suit the agenda? You can't have the history and be a continuation of the old club and then claim to be innocent because you are the same club but it was the old club that did it even though we claim to be the old club .140 years of newco history Take the history and all the punishments that go with the privilege of using the history or ask for a new licence and start from scratch avoiding any punishment because you are not in any way the old club .Several months since conception. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CambieBud Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 punish us and take away our honours,cups & titles and we will reek havoc. What havoc can they reek? They have no aces at all. By the way, how are Brechin supposed to prepare for Sundays cup tie when they don't have a clue what team, if any, they are playing? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 (edited) How can you punish the old club? It is dead, finito, kaput. Its history is finished. In my book it has absolutely no claim to any single one of the tainted titles it racked up, since the very beginning of its existence. This 'title-stripping' issue has only been brought up because Fat Sally and ra peepul in general can't accept that they're representing a phoenix club, with no link whatsoever to Deadco. Edited July 25, 2012 by vikingTON 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fife Saint Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 How can you punish the old club? It is dead, finito, kaput. Its history is finished. In my book it has absolutely no claim to any single one of the tainted titles it racked up, since the very beginning of its existence. This 'title-stripping' issue has only been brought up because Fat Sally and ra peepul in general can't accept that they're representing a phoenix club, with no link whatsoever to Deadco. So, what you're saying is you can't accept this? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeHectorPar Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 This is beyond a joke now. The SPL said Rangers had a prima facie case to answer, and the BBC lawyers never would have let their documentary air if they had even one ounce of doubt about the content. I think it's fair to surmise that the BBC know a lot more than they aired too. Why are the Scottish football authorities not laying down the law to these chunts. There should be no negotiations, no deals, no bargaining. Who the fcuk do Green and McCoist think they are? Someone in the SPL and SFA, get a grip of this situation. Chunts? Surely you're not suggesting they may be closet Thims? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 So, what you're saying is you can't accept this? Until Fat Sally et al accept what they are, they should be absolutely hammered with every punishment that still ought to have been applied to the OldCo. Fair? Not really. Then again, cheating creditors out of £140 million isn't fair either. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeHectorPar Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 What havoc can they reek? They have no aces at all. By the way, how are Brechin supposed to prepare for Sundays cup tie when they don't have a clue what team, if any, they are playing? And what about Ra'gers. Fat Sally keeps telling us he only has 6 players to choose from. Sunday will give us the answer about how much shîte he is talking. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 (edited) I'd have preferred if Rangers had been pounded into the dust, never to re-emerge in any form. I'd have preferred if they'd been made to apply for a place in SFL3 alongside others. I'd have preferred if the transfer embargo was in place right now, rather than when the window closes anyway. However, I'm delighted they've had such a horrible time of late and that diddy fans have managed to prevent the other clubs and the authorities from letting them off with it all completely. For me, since the SPL and SFL clubs voted in turn to place them in the bottom tier, the last remaining major issue concerns stripping titles from them which were won during the double contract years. To my mind, that remains as likely to happen as ever following today's alleged developments and I'll therefore take it. To me, no sanction could be too severe for that horrible lot, but I'm starting to find what we're getting, increasingly acceptable. Edited July 25, 2012 by Monkey Tennis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p&b is a disgrace Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 This is beyond a joke now. The SPL said Rangers had a prima facie case to answer, and the BBC lawyers never would have let their documentary air if they had even one ounce of doubt about the content. I think it's fair to surmise that the BBC know a lot more than they aired too. Why are the Scottish football authorities not laying down the law to these chunts. There should be no negotiations, no deals, no bargaining. Who the fcuk do Green and McCoist think they are? Someone in the SPL and SFA, get a grip of this situation. b.b.b.b.b.b.b.....they wouldn't get their brown paper envelop stuffed with cash then! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 (edited) Gio's latest He doesn't think that Rangers Football Club is interested in vendettas or vengance. He also "has to think very carefully about applying for an injunction" So he won't. He did not mention any of the tax shenanigans either. Maybe that's all blamed on Whyte, not the club. He's deluded. And MISTER Murray, not SIR David He might be raising the Orc's hopes but nothing will come of it. Edited July 25, 2012 by cyderspaceman 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Chunts? Surely you're not suggesting they may be closet Thims? Spending time on Orcmedia can damage your mental health 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hotelandywalker Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 He doesn't think that Rangers Football Club is interested in vendettas or vengance. He also "has to think very carefully about applying for an injunction" So he won't. He did not mention any of the tax shenanigans either. Maybe that's all blamed on Whyte, not the club. He's deluded. And MISTER Murray, not SIR David He might be raising the Orc's hopes but nothing will come of it. "Stupiditiness" (mentioned around 7:45) is a new word I'll need to add to my dictionary. I think it possibly describes my decision to click on that link 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Could anyone sum-up what (if anything) has happened today? See on BBC website that there's more 'optimistic noises' that could be truth or tosh. Any substance to claims SFL had sold rights to SPL as they'd demanded? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeHectorPar Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Spending time on Orcmedia can damage your mental health I know. Worked out who I am? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.