Bookies Love Me Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Can all innuendo and talk of sexual deviation please go to the relevant thread, i.e. BEASTwatch 2014? I'm sure they will cater for all tastes there. Anyway, has Tesco bought murray park yet?? Can ally last 'til Christmas?? Have any of the bears signed up to be members of the "fans board" yet?? Boyd? Superb marksman or fat lazy useless twat?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 I searched on the 'net for 'rangers shares' and found nothing from the msm. The stock market side of things is more likely to destroy them than anything else but no-one seems to be talking about it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLip69 Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Yes and no, but the fans and stadium are key. I think many clubs in Scotland have changed company ownership. Having said that bears should be embarrassed by what club did. They didnt change ownership though, the old owner never sold it to the new owner. It was liquidated and Sevco bought the liquidated stock. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 I searched on the 'net for 'rangers shares' and found nothing from the msm. The stock market side of things is more likely to destroy them than anything else but no-one seems to be talking about it. They think if they don't talk about it , the nasty problem will all go away. (Have we got news for them! ) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 You did ask I knew the answer. I jusf wanted you to admit you are a hypocrit whilst removing your wriggle room. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 (edited) What's strange is you screamed and applauded one piece of sick innuendo as a magnificent piece of trolling and are now condemning another for the same. Double standards, hypocrite and no real moral stance on the subject matter are all accusations that readily spring to mind. But hey .. no doubt you'll say your fishing while Monkey thinks 'you've got him there'. Glad to see your principles are sound. I never condemned it thicko, I thought it mildly amusing. What I'm condemning the hypocrisy behind the post.Edit- why are you not going on a 10 page rant about paedo apologist HB just now, are you a hypocrit too? Edited August 15, 2014 by stonedsailor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 So you are agree with using it ... it's just hypocrisy that bothers you? The hypocrisy does not bother me either. Just pointing it out, touchy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 (edited) strange that you feel the need to attack me rather than paedo apologist HB. Edited August 15, 2014 by stonedsailor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 (edited) Strange that you felt you need to attack me when scum use child molesters as a point scoring exercise, the same scum that jump up and down when a statue.gif was used as a joke. No word of the hypocrisy there. As for HB .. I never condemned, agreed nor stated I found it mildly amusing ... you did that all on your own. Do keep wriggling .. that I do find mildly amusing. Thicko indeed. Excellent, we'll get you that heads gone award this week.I never attacked you, or HB. I am just pointing out facts and you are rolling with them. Do you understand hypocrisy? Mentioning your hypocrisy on child molestors whilst "scum" are going about their business is not hypocritical. Chastising folks for child abuse quips them using child abuse quips to taunt the same people is hypocritical. Edited August 15, 2014 by stonedsailor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 "You're much wurser than me, so ye ur" thread for this pish. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 *sigh* Pretty sure we had a conversation about personal attacks on here. I will start banning people if it continues 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 *sigh* Pretty sure we had a conversation about personal attacks on here. I will start banning people if it continues Hooray ! Teacher is here ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Hooray ! Teacher is here ! QUIET at the back! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 (edited) What's strange is you readily applauded one piece of sick innuendo as a magnificent piece of trolling and are now condemning another for the same. Double standards, hypocrite and no real moral stance on the subject matter are all accusations that readily spring to mind. But hey .. no doubt you'll say your fishing while Monkey thinks 'you've got him there'. Glad to see your principles are sound. You attacked my principles Dhenny simply for pointing out that it was strange for HBQC to use a beast analogy after so vehemently arguing against mentioning the beasts of parkhead.8 and benny did troll you extremely well. The thing about innuendo is that the party reading or hearing that innuendo needs to make the connection. "Fritzel moment" is not innuendo, it's a direct reference to child abuse. Why are you not losing the plot with HB? Why are you picking on me? EDIT- sorry X if I was included in that. Started my post before your reprimand. Edited August 15, 2014 by stonedsailor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Ban him Mr X ... he clearly stuck two fingers up to you. In the fairness of a right of reply to your question seeing as it's been asked. Innuendo and connection. Bennett's 'Celtic and 'Big Lie' .. is exactly the same ... nothing else could be inferred from it especially with No8's reply. I asked you to explain what else it could infer or the blatant point scoring posts that followed. You simply declined to answer. There is no difference as those terms are publicly acknowledged to be linked to that incident. To pretend that either the Fritzel moment is somehow different to 'Celtic and the Big Lie' nudge, nudge , wink wink, is at best disingenuous. As for my lack of comment on HB .. I already responded to you on that point. You were the one making supposed intellectual judgements on the authors and their content, nobody else. I notice you have looped back to start of the argument and ignored the pointing out of your hypocrisy altogether. Happy to leave it there and take it to PM ... My apologies to the forum and Mr-X. This was a discussion between me and HB, leave it at that, you are heading down the same route as before. Your input was neither required nor requested. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 This was a discussion between me and HB, leave it at that, you are heading down the same route as before. Your input was neither required nor requested. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Two celtic supporters have now used child abuse as whataboutery/ point scoring. One tried to blacken the name of a former Rangers captain even though there is actually no prove whatsoever....none. Bennett and i were mildly mocking their refusal to accept their cover up 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 I can't be fucked reading the entirety of his eye-bleeding pish posts, but did Dhenbhoy understand that using child abuse to mock (Fritzl) then cry like little bitches when others use it in the other direction (Torbett etc) is hypocritical? Or did he swerve it completely with a mix of tear stained barely-literate pish and Sevco-related whataboutery? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 I can't be fucked reading the entirety of his eye-bleeding pish posts, but did Dhenbhoy understand that using child abuse to mock (Fritzl) then cry like little bitches when others use it in the other direction (Torbett etc) is hypocritical? Or did he swerve it completely with a mix of tear stained barely-literate pish and Sevco-related whataboutery? Good guess. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Doesn't read .. but comments. Says it all. So you totally avoided it then. Cool. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.